Skip to main content

in reply to xabd

LocalSend lets you securely share files and messages with nearby devices over your local network—no internet or third-party servers required. It’s open-source, cross-platform (desktop & mobile), fast, and works fully offline.

github.com/localsend/localsend

in reply to xabd

I gave this a try during the drama with syncthing-fork (new maintainer without a heads up from catfriend1). Had no issues sending from Fedora. GrapheneOS wouldn't send any files. Too bad.
in reply to Scott 🇨🇦🏴‍☠️

If you want to send files between just your own devices KDE Connect is great and can do many other things too. If you are on Gnome there is a gnome extension for better integration (gsconnect I think?)
in reply to Scott 🇨🇦🏴‍☠️

Check out the firewall settings, it could be the issue. Also don't forget to turn off VPN on both devices if you're using one.
in reply to Dop

That's why it wouldn't work for me - I never turn off my vpn. Syncthing works through a vpn so I use that.
in reply to Scott 🇨🇦🏴‍☠️

I'm not sure that's needed, but the firewall on your PC is likely to be blocking the connection by default
in reply to xabd

Not to rain in on localsends parade but you can also send via echo text | nc -l -p 1234 and receive via nc <sender-ip> 1234
in reply to MonkderVierte

I have a few qualms with this app:

1. For a Linux user, you can already build such a system yourself quite trivially by getting an FTP account, mounting it locally with curlftpfs, and then using SVN or CVS on the mounted filesystem. From Windows or Mac, this FTP account could be accessed through built-in software.


From news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8…

in reply to exu

Aren’t both of these solutions unencrypted?
in reply to MonkderVierte

unencrypted, unauthenticated, unverified, and not just hard but impossible on phones.
in reply to xabd

I've been using Local Send for almost a year (I think) and love it. Graohene to my Linux machine no problem...well, no problem when I remember to adjust my firewall.
in reply to xabd

I'm always annoyed at the "AirDrop alternative" marketing. It's not. It requires both of your devices to share a network.

The truest AirDrop alternative that uses discovery and ad-hoc connections between devices is FlyingCarpet. It definitely needs a simpler UI though.

in reply to exu

Who said it was an airdrop alternative? Maybe a reason why it is called "Local" send
in reply to taco

I must be blind, I just check the about section and can't see it mentioned but as someone else said, it's on title of post
in reply to paf

About section of the project (top-right of the page for me on desktop), not the readme file. It's literally just "An open-source cross-platform alternative to AirDrop" + a link to localsend.org.
in reply to exu

I was gonna say… “no internet connection required” is not the key attribute of AirDrop. AirDrop doesn’t even require a network connection. It’s a weird comparison.
in reply to exu

Conference meeting test: you and a bunch of strangers gather for a quick q&a after a conference talk, the author wants to share their slidedeck with you. Everyone has whatever solution you are evaluating pre installed but your strangers so you have nothing setup specifically for this group... How many button presses across everyone does it take to share the slides?

Wait, I don't see you. Are you on the conference wifi? No I'm on call data, join the conference wifi. What's the password. Ok. Thanks. I joined it, I don't see the file. Which wifi are you on? Oh I'm on 5g. This is too complicated join my hot spot. Fuck I can't see your hotspot, turn airplane mode on and off. I joined it but I don't see anyone....

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to

btw localsend has some plans for supporting google's somewhat common but proprietary quickshare functionality, but it seems the app hasn't received an update in almost a year
in reply to exu

Eh, yes and no. It may not have 1-for-1 feature parity, but it's still an alternative insofar as two people can transfer files to each other. Yes, LocalSend requires them to be on the same network while AirDrop does not. I still think it's beneficial for LocalSend to show up in search results for "airdrop alternatives" b/c it might be good enough for most people's use cases and it is perhaps the most feature complete, easiest to use, free & open source option out there.
in reply to curious_dolphin

but it's still an alternative insofar as two people can transfer files to each other


after painfully figuring out (or not) how to make a hotspot with a somewhat secure password and get the other phone to connect to it.

in reply to exu

That does definitely replicate the feature of AirDrop more closely. Do you have any experience with it? Does it work reliably?

A thing to look out for is Wifi Aware, which would enable the functionality if implemented. That is what was recently also used by google to enable android<->ios Airdrop

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to unskilled5117

why another wifi standard? we already have wifi adhoc mode, and at least 2 different wifi directs. why couldn't they just build upon that?
in reply to xabd

Been using localsend for maybe 2 years now.

Super simple and absolutely wonderful program. Something that any OS on any device should have just came as a free and simple implementation from the get go, but instead they make it as hard as can be without passing your data through their grubby little fingers first.

LocalSend is the best way to move and backup your files without the cloud or a data cable.