Skip to main content

in reply to StopTech

I guess they don't realize we're in the early stages of WW3.
in reply to StopTech

I don't know... I feel the world has become so strange after covid.
in reply to brokenwing

Covid does affect the brain.

But seriously, people have always been that stupid, it's just that capitalism and fascism are a race towards the bottom, that speeds up over time.

in reply to StopTech

in reply to Arcanoloth

Since they're law enforcement I interpreted the report as them preparing for the worst possible outcomes given upcoming tech, and then escalating in response to that.
in reply to StopTech

Surely they're gonna build a robot police force with no oil, no gallium, and no robot factories.

I predict a 2035 with no europe.

(Although I do like the idea of being a criminal commanding hundreds of robots. The republican space cops with their slave armies and idealism magic would hate me. CIS ftw.)

in reply to StopTech

I’d like to watch the full length video. The link doesn’t work obviously. Can you point me in the right direction?
in reply to timmytbt

The Bitchute link should work. Here's one directly to the mp4: zbbb278hfll091.bitchute.com/Km… Again, it's about 49 minutes in that talks about the Europol report.
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to StopTech

Sounds like somebody at Europol just had a blast playing Detroit Become Human.
in reply to StopTech

All of your links (apart from the PDF) are broken, mate.
in reply to IratePirate

They work for others. It would be helpful to know in what way they aren't working for you. And did you try this one? zbbb278hfll091.bitchute.com/Km… (49 minutes in)
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to StopTech

Whats the alternative, let China and Russia build up the technology and we stay in the past?

The US has the largest military because its the reserve currency, they print money and export their inflation and they spend that money on military expenditures, which prevents people from moving off USD.

This then lets them sanction other countries and control the worlds shipping lanes, so asking them to stop developing their military is asking for the existing global order to cease to exist, and then you're at the whims of whatever power fills that void.

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to StopTech

Having rejected centralised restrictions on technology then, the alternative we are left with is decentralised restriction. This could include boycotts, agreements, social stigma, parallel economies, civil disobedience and more, with the goal of limiting the development, distribution or adoption of anti-human technologies.


So you require that people just boycott countries like China, stop buying their trinkets and they'll stop creating doomsday weapons?

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to maplesaga

No. I'm not convinced China is worse than the US in terms of developing anti-human technologies and people living in China can't boycott China. The point is to get the people in every significant country (including China) to oppose these technologies so strongly that they aren't able to be developed anywhere. The Chinese military has to employ Chinese people to make its weapons, but if 80% of the population is opposed to these weapons existing and even the foundation of modern technology on which they are built then that is going to be difficult. Even if they were able to only employ those who are fine with WMDs the public's opposition to modern technology would be a problem for the government maintaining control while developing those weapons and forcing modern technology on the people as a means of controlling them.
in reply to StopTech

This is completely unfeasible. Convincing a bunch of people won't cut it. For this to work, you'd need to rule the whole world with an iron fist, and then there'd still be secret resistance research labs everywhere.
in reply to m532

Ruling with an iron fist tends to create resistance and without mass surveillance technology an unpopular regime couldn't keep everyone in line. But if instead most people are in agreement about something being bad (like they are with slavery or pedophilia) then there is much less resistance to enforcement against it (whether that's centralized or decentralized enforcement) and therefore that thing is more effectively stopped.

While lone individuals or small secretive groups could continue doing the bad practice, in terms of technology I don't think this will matter much because they won't be able to develop a lot of technology with only a small group of people who aren't building on other people's work and their technology also wouldn't be adopted by a society that is against it.

This entry was edited (1 week ago)