Skip to main content


Don’t CW this. I beg you.

My wife is on Instagram. She just did this.
She heard there was weird stuff happening. She searched “#Republican” and “#Democrat”.

She had to do it herself to see if it was true.

It is.

She is beside herself.

This is the 2025 version of marching into CNN and telling them to broadcast only his stuff.

This is him taking over the NYT.

This is new age Oligarchy. This is Authoritarianism. This is Fascism2025.
Edit: we’re in Canada, so this is worldwide? Or NA?

This entry was edited (5 days ago)

reshared this

in reply to Chris Alemany🇺🇦🇨🇦🇪🇸

FWIW, in Sweden I can search Instagram for #republican and I get lots of results, whereas if I try to search for #democrat it isn’t a searchable term. The closest I can get is #démocratie (which is French for Democracy). We are clearly not supposed to search for #democrat and we’re given plenty of options for #republican.
in reply to Paul Chambers

@paul
So, yeah. I tried it on a browser. Lots of hashtag republican content, nothing for hashtag democrat. If you search without the hashtag on "democrat" you get content, but most of it is from Newsmax (which is to the right of Fox News) talking about how corrupt the democrats are.

So there seem to be legitimacy to this.

in reply to Virginia Holloway

@VirginiaHolloway @paul I'm not able to reproduce this now. All searches work, and progressive content is displayed in the results.
in reply to Chris Alemany🇺🇦🇨🇦🇪🇸

Chris, I gotta ask: How many passes does a company get for helping commit genocide before people stop being shocked at them doing bad things?
in reply to Kinetix

@kinetix I am not on fb. So the answer for me personally is they passed the threshold a long time ago... but that doesnt lessen the impact or the need to inform and confirm and expose on their current manifestations of fascism.
in reply to Chris Alemany🇺🇦🇨🇦🇪🇸

Sure, and that's totally reasonable. I just have a really tough time understanding how anyone is shocked at anything they do - I firmly believe they should have been shut down a long time ago. I used to believe this was due to lawmakers being slow to respond and act on internet-related things they don't understand, but we've also seen, at least in the US, if they want to pass bizarro laws to limit things online, it can be done quickly.
in reply to Jules

@afewbugs Just saw this but I am glad the BBC wrote about it! shocking stuff.
in reply to Aral Balkan

@aral @tansy this, now picked up by the BBC bbc.com/news/articles/c4g32yxp…