får jag föreslå AltText, för att jag skulle gärna boosta? (Och ursäkta att den är på engelska)
A map of the Strait of Hormuz, showing the sharp bend in the water where it flows around the pointy bit of Oman close to the Iranian shore. User Todd has drawn a blue line straight across the middle of the peninsula, from about Abu Dhabi to Sohar, and helpfully added a red arrow pointing to it labelled "Canal", with the comment "Why are we bothering with the Strait of Hormuz when we could just do this? Explain it to me like I'm 5".
User RIOS 508 has replied, in capital letters, "Mountain hard and big, water no up, many many dig dig".
Not to mention that any halfway competent navy can occupy both sides of a canal, so it would fail to achieve its objective even if you could instantly have it made by magic.
I mean, the highway 7 + E22 already cross that mountain range in a valley. It's not inconceivable - we *have* completed such civil engineering projects before.
(A lot more sensible than NEOM.)
Both ends of the channel would be in sovereign waters (UAE/Oman) and harder to block without an outright war.
Of course, solving a political problem through engineering is ... unlikely to completely address the issue. (And, ofc, outright war seems to be the preferred option these days.)
"WATER NO UP" got me thinking. When the Pirates of the Caribbean ride was built at Disneyland, they had to make the ride go under the train tracks, which is the reason for the two waterfall portions. At the end there is a chain lift to raise the boat back up to street level.
So they could do the reverse here, build a chain lift up the Ru'us al-Jibal, and then a log flume down the other side. Then everyone on the ship would go WEEEEEEEEE!!! (for 12 miles)
Cecilia | MeraOrd
in reply to Quo usque tandem-cykel📎 • • •Anna
in reply to Quo usque tandem-cykel📎 • • •får jag föreslå AltText, för att jag skulle gärna boosta? (Och ursäkta att den är på engelska)
A map of the Strait of Hormuz, showing the sharp bend in the water where it flows around the pointy bit of Oman close to the Iranian shore. User Todd has drawn a blue line straight across the middle of the peninsula, from about Abu Dhabi to Sohar, and helpfully added a red arrow pointing to it labelled "Canal", with the comment "Why are we bothering with the Strait of Hormuz when we could just do this? Explain it to me like I'm 5".
User RIOS 508 has replied, in capital letters, "Mountain hard and big, water no up, many many dig dig".
Quo usque tandem-cykel📎
in reply to Anna • • •Joakim Fors
in reply to Quo usque tandem-cykel📎 • • •Gurre Vildskägg
in reply to Quo usque tandem-cykel📎 • • •Kanalen borde gå från Kuwait till Gaza!
Mad Engineering
in reply to Quo usque tandem-cykel📎 • • •Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷
in reply to Quo usque tandem-cykel📎 • • •I mean, the highway 7 + E22 already cross that mountain range in a valley. It's not inconceivable - we *have* completed such civil engineering projects before.
(A lot more sensible than NEOM.)
Both ends of the channel would be in sovereign waters (UAE/Oman) and harder to block without an outright war.
Of course, solving a political problem through engineering is ... unlikely to completely address the issue. (And, ofc, outright war seems to be the preferred option these days.)
ChookMother 🇦🇺🦘
in reply to Quo usque tandem-cykel📎 • • •Captain Packrat
in reply to Quo usque tandem-cykel📎 • • •"WATER NO UP" got me thinking. When the Pirates of the Caribbean ride was built at Disneyland, they had to make the ride go under the train tracks, which is the reason for the two waterfall portions. At the end there is a chain lift to raise the boat back up to street level.
So they could do the reverse here, build a chain lift up the Ru'us al-Jibal, and then a log flume down the other side. Then everyone on the ship would go WEEEEEEEEE!!! (for 12 miles)
Phosphenes
in reply to Captain Packrat • • •I love the idea of a roller coaster where each car is an oil tanker. 🔥
Klarname: #NichtMeineRegierung
in reply to Quo usque tandem-cykel📎 • • •Erwan 🚄
in reply to Quo usque tandem-cykel📎 • • •Joe W
in reply to Quo usque tandem-cykel📎 • • •DressToKILT
in reply to Quo usque tandem-cykel📎 • • •myrmepropagandist
in reply to Quo usque tandem-cykel📎 • • •Mistake not ...
in reply to Quo usque tandem-cykel📎 • • •adritheonly
in reply to Quo usque tandem-cykel📎 • • •SeanBurlington 🌈 🕊️
in reply to Quo usque tandem-cykel📎 • • •and a big engineering project in the missile of a war zone might be problematic
Map of missile range for context