Skip to main content


Published in an Elsevier journal.

Edit: at first I thought this must be a prank played on the editors, but as several people have pointed out in the replies, you can read the text as a satire of real problems in the medical profession, so maybe the editors were in on the joke.

doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.1…

#science #PeerReview #AcademicPublishing

This entry was edited (2 hours ago)

reshared this

in reply to Benjamin Geer

Ahaha wow how did it get published? I would really like to see those reviews

Also, check the contributions:

Edit: it took me looking at some of the other answers here to realise that this is actually a pretty serious letter highlighting (condemning) problems with (probably real) surgeons' behaviour and choices. You'll see when you read the letter..

This entry was edited (2 hours ago)
in reply to El Duvelle

@elduvelle This author has a number of papers purporting to talk about the first female neurosurgeon in X country... But I'm having trouble finding evidence those people even exist, or that this person exists. This is so wild
in reply to A. Nicholas

@anic Reading the letter, I wouldn't be surprised if the authors' names were fake. They would probably get some backlash from their community if they weren't anonymous (they are actually trying to condemn all sorts of bad behaviours from surgeons).
in reply to Benjamin Geer

That’s one expensive joke! I would like to believe that the mass protests it will trigger will be worth every cent but most #academics are seemingly affected by a highly persistent case of Stockholm syndrome so I fear it may be wasted…
#AcademicChatter #PeerReview #AcademicPublishing #academia
in reply to Kate Nyhan

@kdnyhan Or they were in on it. I don't know but, which ever way, I can't say it leaves a good impression of the journal...
in reply to Antonio Páez 🇲🇽🇨🇦

@paezha @ElenLeFoll
The joke is on all the other authors who paid to publish a "peer-reviewed" case report in the journal, and on all the residents who didn't pay to get a line on their CV from International Journal of Surgery Case Reports and got worse matches/jobs because they had fewer publications, and on all the patients that these surgeons are treating, who trust in their knowledge and critical appraisal skills.
in reply to Kate Nyhan

@paezha @ElenLeFoll
Oh, don't forget the funders associated with these articles (and APCs - because even if the joking/stinging authors *potentially* used a correspondence APC, the rest of them have presumably paid)
openalex.org/works?page=1&filt…
in reply to Kate Nyhan

And it's not just "oh look, it's a fake case report showing that the journal's processes are flawed, haha." The fake case reports feature a fictional surgeon making and concealing a medical error after a "violent conjugal argument." Another fictional surgeon recommends a course of treatment based on the opportunity to perform a prestigious operation.
in reply to Kate Nyhan

Another one (and I hope this tidbit is fictional but I wouldn't be surprised either way) repeats: “Is it really urgent? Is it a matter of neurosurgery? or as usual the guy has boo-boos and he comes to piss us off!”
in reply to Kate Nyhan

@kdnyhan This is not actually a joke - it aims to highlight many existing but hidden problems with surgeons - malpractice, burnout, etc. which they are probably not allowed to talk about publicly. The cases they describe might be real, but they can't say that, hence the localisation on "Saturn" to make sure they can't be accused of defamation. I think.