Unions are not perfect. Indeed, it is possible to belong to a union that is bad for workers: either because it is weak, or corrupt, or captured (or some combination of the three).
--
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
pluralistic.net/2025/12/15/cla…
1/

Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Take the "two-tier contract." As unions lost ground - thanks to changes in labor enforcement under a succession of both GOP and Dem administrations - labor bosses hit on a *suicidal* strategy for contract negotiations. Rather than bargaining for a single contract that covered all the union's dues-paying members, these bosses negotiated contracts that guaranteed benefits for *existing* members, but did not extend these benefits to *new* members:
pluralistic.net/2021/11/25/str…
2/
Pluralistic: 25 Nov 2021 – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
A two-tier contract is one where *all* workers pay dues, but only the dwindling rump of older, more established workers get any protection or representation from their union. An ever-larger portion of the membership have to pay dues, but get *nothing* for them. You couldn't come up with a better way to destroy unions if you tried.
3/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Thankfully, union workers figured out that the answer to this problem was firing their leaders and replacing them with militant, principled leaders who cared about *workers*, not just a subsection of their members. Radicals in big unions - like the UAW - teamed up with comrades from university grad students' unions to master the arcane rules that had been weaponized by corrupt bosses to prevent free and fair union elections.
4/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Together, they forced the first legitimate union elections in generations, and then the newly elected leaders ran historic strikes that won huge gains for workers (and killed the two-tier contract):
theintercept.com/2023/04/07/de…
Corrupt unions aren't the only life-destroying institutions that radicals have set their sights on this decade. Concentrated corporate power is the most dangerous force in the world (indeed, it's large, powerful corporations that corrupted those unions).
5/
The Teamsters and the UAW Gear Up for Struggle
TI Podcasts (The Intercept)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Antitrust activists, environmental activists, consumer rights activists, privacy activists and labor activists have stepped up the global war on big business all through this decade. From new antitrust laws to antitrust lawsuits to strikes to boycotts to mass protests and direct action, this decade has marked a turning point in the global consciousness about the danger of corporate power and the need to fight it.
6/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
But there's a big, important difference between bad corporations and bad unions: what we should do about them.
The answer to a powerful, corrupt corporation is to take action that strips it of its power: break the company up, whack it with fines, take away its corporate charter, strip its executives of their fortunes, even put them in prison.
7/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
That's because corporations are foundationally undemocratic institutions, governed by "one share, one vote" (and the billionaires who benefit from corporate power are building a society that's "one dollar, one vote").
They fundamentally exist to consolidate power *at the expense* of workers, suppliers and customers, to extract wealth by imposing costs on the rest of us, from pollution to political corruption.
8/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
When a corporation gets big enough to pose a risk to societal wellbeing, we need to smash that corporation, not reform it.
But the answer to a corrupt union is to fire the union bosses and replace them with better ones. The mission of a union is foundationally *pro-democratic*. A unionized workplace is a democratic workplace. As in any democracy, workplace democracies can be led by bad or incompetent people.
9/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
But, as with any democracy, the way you fix this is by swapping out the bad leaders for good ones - not by abolishing democracy and replacing it with an atomized society in which it's every worker for themself, bargaining with a boss who will always win a one-on-one fight in the long run.
I raise this because a general strike is back on the table, likely for May Day 2028 (5/1/28):
labornotes.org/2025/12/maybe-g…
10/
Maybe a General Strike Isn’t So Impossible Now
Labor NotesCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Unions are an important check against fascism. That's why fascists always start by attacking organized labor: solidarity is the opposite of fascism.
To have unions that are fit for purpose in this existential battle for the future of the nation - and, quite possibly, the human race - we desperately need better leaders.
11/
Nicole Parsons
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Grooming a cohort of effective leaders happened in the 1930's.
Public education absorbed a generation of university graduates when higher education was defunded in the 1930's. Those teachers taught civil rights leaders, women's rights advocates and union members. Public libraries for the self educated
This time Koch Network got there first. Dismantling effective public education forestalled that path to growing good leaders.
They're also attacking libraries...
1/
Nicole Parsons
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Another form of union busting is the practice of gender-based "inside unions" vs "outside unions".
Many public sector employers use this divide & conquer tactic.
Inside unions require higher education & experience levels, on average, for its members, mostly female, with a self-serving male supervisory elite that get the higher wages of exempt staff.
Outside unions are mostly blue collar white males who ensure that the 17 year old ..
1/
stephen m 🍞🌹🇵🇸
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •This is a another great piece and recommend others to see more of the strategy to take on bad union leaders through DSA's Rank and File Strategy rfs.dsausa.org/
and also a great book from labor notes Democracy is Power by the late Mike Parker labornotes.org/store/democracy…
The Rank-and-File Strategy
The Rank-and-File Strategy