Skip to main content

in reply to refract

That's nice. But my porn doesn't play (cors blocked), while Chromium has no decent downloader or link-grabber extension.
This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
in reply to MonkderVierte

lol. maybe use a porn site that yt-dlp supports or contribute by making an extractor
in reply to refract

Great for Firefox (which I use), and for all forks...
in reply to refract

I hate it when my screen is full of fingerprints after I eat crisps like a fatzo
in reply to refract

Finally, I've wanted this for ages but forks like Tor and Mullvad always took the fingerprinting defense too far (with no option to tone it down).
in reply to FoundFootFootage78

That's why browsers like Librewolf exist.

Tor Browser and Mullvad Browser are not supposed to be tampered with, else you just defeated their purpose.

This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
in reply to quick_snail

Lives are good and all, but I paid for my whole screen and so I'm damn well gonna use my whole screen.
in reply to Auli

Refuges. Whistleblowers. Journalists. Human rights workers.

Israel, United States, Iran, China, Russia.

Loads of examples where this tech literally saves peoples lives.

Unknown parent

lemmy - Link to source
Blisterexe
All the AI (except for one opt-in feature that lets you choose what service to use) is on-device, so although It's not really necessary, you can't really say it's bad for privacy.
Unknown parent

lemmy - Link to source
eldavi
it's hard to blame them: the entirety of technology is trying to adopt AI due to all of the money that's being flashed at them for doing so; our entire economy is based on it right now.
in reply to Blisterexe

Also, the one feature I've come across (long press a link for a preview) is actually pretty useful sometimes. I'm actually impressed they discovered a use for generative AI that isn't annoying and stupid.
in reply to James R Kirk

in reply to refract

  • The available screen resolution is the screen height minus 48 pixels.


Isn’t it pointless to change all device screens from their constant size of 1,080 to a reported size of 1,080 - 48 or (whatever x,xxx - 48)?

Why not report x,xxx as random # ? Or does that start to identify more than make one blend in?

This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
in reply to LlilL

That would make you more fingerprint able. The idea is to make more computers look the same, not make you unique.

They're saying that they don't tell the site the size of the browser window, but the screen size minus a reasonable margin for the toolbar and stuff

in reply to LlilL

The more unique it is, the more easy to find you. That's why anti-fingerprinting is a problem because removing tracking makes you more unique compared to millions of devices with the same data tracked.
in reply to irmadlad

Hey slopper that's not at all what a long press is or how it works. Long presses are when you press with the side of your finger cuz its longer duh! It works the same as regular press they just add a wait timer so the BPU (brained processing unit) doesn't get over stimulated and stuck.
in reply to James R Kirk

On-device translation is also exactly what I want out of this tech and we have it. You can even just go to about:translations. This isn’t 2001 anymore, you shouldn’t be using someone else’s server to translate something quick for you. Not at first pass at least.
Unknown parent

lemmy - Link to source
quick_snail
That's just a thing to get money
in reply to DoGeeseSeeGod

LOL

There is a phenom on the internet that says, if you want the real answer to your question, log in to a forum, ask the question then log out. Then log in as secondary user and give the wrong answer. In a matter of seconds you will be inundated with the right answer.

in reply to refract

The available screen resolution is the screen height minus 48 pixels.


How does this help woth fingerprinting?