Skip to main content


No, graphene isn't being targeted by the french government.


in reply to Blisterexe

I wouldn't say it's nothing, because they definitely are trying to weaken or break privacy and encryption, but it also isn't exactly an ongoing targeted campaign.
in reply to frongt

Yeah, but the they is law enforcement, not the government.
in reply to unexposedhazard

The point I'm making is that law enforcement trying to break into encrypted phones, and news orgs coverting that isn't "the government targeting them". There is a distinction between "the government" and law enforcement.
in reply to HikingVet

The police's job is to enforce the laws that be, and be bound by them. The legislature, in france's case, the assemblée nationale and sénat, write the laws. As an example, french law enforcement can't force signal to break their encryption, but the legislature could.
in reply to frongt

France was also leading the charge in the shutdown of those other encrypted phone services. They claimed that those were only used by criminals but never provided any evidence. They also broke multiple laws during their investigation. So yes the french government definitely is dirty in this regard and deserves calling out.
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to frongt

They specified it was a media campaign influenced by law enforcement. They may have referenced law enforcement going after them but they meant through a propaganda campaign and they said the measures they're taking are entirely preventative. They aren't interested in fooling around with a government that just got caught trying to assassinate an African leader. Perspective. They always start with a propaganda campaign to label their targets criminals or terrorists. I'd say Graphene's response during an incredibly dark era of history is definitely called for. Its no longer 2014. Its 2025 with fascist coups taking place all over and digital security is one of their main targets. I strongly disagree with the OP and I've been keeping up with entire saga on Graphene's social media and interacting with them about it.
in reply to Blisterexe

You're missing the important fact that there were other articles published in the same week, directly interviewing law enforcement or magistrate officials, indicating that they were considering measures against the organization.

I think it was this one: leparisien.fr/faits-divers/tel…

in reply to leobluefish

I mean yeah, but that's an article from a private company that says that law enforcement is going to try to hack into criminal's phones. Which, like, duh.

The person being interviewed explicitely says that since there are legitimate users of the service, they won't take the same approach they did with services used only by criminals.

Avec ce nouvel outil, il existe pour une certaine partie des utilisateurs une réelle légitimité dans la volonté de protéger ses échanges. L’approche est donc différente. Mais ça ne nous empêchera pas de poursuivre les éditeurs, si des liens sont découverts avec une organisation criminelle et qu’ils ne coopèrent pas avec la justice.


they're saying that if grapheneOS is found to be explicitely working with criminals they'll take measures against the org, which is completely reasonable.

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Blisterexe

I guess you can update your initial misleading post, since you didn't consider all the news coverage and only singled out one article to fit your narrative 👍
in reply to leobluefish

The exact same article that the GrapheneOS devs cited, I mentioned the other news coverage, but didn't find it necessary to cite every article, since the point I'm making still stands.
in reply to Blisterexe

You should be more consistent with your capitalisation of proper nouns so it's clear your post is about a company, not a chemical
in reply to Blisterexe

You forgot that french juges have used the facts that people installed Linux, Signal, /e/OS and GrapheneOS has evidence to charge them!

I think they were leftists activists charged for eco-terrorism but I don't remember all the details but you should take a look. La Quadrature du Net has done some blogging and court things over this events of dark times.

in reply to Sonalder

You forgot that french juges have used the facts that people installed Linux, Signal, /e/OS and GrapheneOS has evidence to charge them!


this sounds insane but common for judges; do you have any sources for this?

in reply to eldavi

Yes, sorry I was too lazy to provide any sources here are a few (mostly in french sorry). It was called the 8 December case or "L'Affaire du 8 décembre" in french.

Edit:
- archive.is/lemonde.fr/societe/…

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Sonalder

Except that for the moment, no decision of the judges shows that they have retained the fact of having Linux, Signal, /e/OS or GrapheneOS installed, even in the case of 8 December. And I'm talking about not the investigating judges here, but the decisions of the judges of the court.

These articles speak only of investigating judges, not of conviction.

in reply to Blisterexe

It would be hilarious if a German newspaper were to publish the same “criminals like this OS and police hate it” clickbait article.
in reply to Da Oeuf

i think i can answer this

personally, when i first encountered graphene's radical statements about the terrible security landscape we're all subjected to, i reacted quite negatively & assumed they were crazy.

then i actually check the technical details of their claims, and fuck me it turns out to be SCARILY correct.

most people don't actually bother with the second part. and you end up with a classic "shoot the messenger" scenario, where the bearer of bad news is equated with the bad news itself & punished by the mob (because they feel it's easier than actually facing the uncomfortable reality of the bad news).

that scenario can only play out for so long before the messenger gets sick of being shot every day & reacts badly to the crowd. then the crowd points at their poor reaction & uses it as further "evidence" against their character.

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Blisterexe

I live in France.
if I say I use Signal or Grapheneos, peoples who consume major newspaper jokingly say : "oh, you're using the criminal thing, you must be a drug dealer/terrorist". It's a joke, but still, I can see that the misunderstanding of those tools are in their head. So French news does a good job to make them look bad.
And recently the Anssi (French agency for security and information system, depending from security ministry) , published a public pdf about mobile phone threat in France since 2015. They talk about hacker, security breach, tools and tips for population to prevent risk. They recommend to use Signal over Sms. But they never mention Grapheneos or any other rom.
This entry was edited (1 week ago)