Skip to main content


in reply to Mark Lansbury

Of course we keep seeing the opposite thing here, where people get scammed, go into the bank and the bank tells them not to transfer the money because it is a scam and they do it anyway and then claim the bank didn't do enough to protect them. Personally I would just have the customer sign a release form.
in reply to Mark Lansbury

Can’t happen with Bitcoin. Just sayin.


Hahahahahahahahha!

in reply to Mark Lansbury

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
in reply to Mark Lansbury

You never have to worry about being scammed because:

in reply to Mark Lansbury

On an open source social network platform with open minded people promoting open source software I would not have expected that they are ignorant and posting opinions (not facts) from a banker.
in reply to Mark Lansbury


A Ponzi scheme is a zero-sum enterprise. But bitcoin is a negative-sum phenomenon that you can’t even pursue a claim against, argues Robert McCauley.

This is a guest post by Robert McCauley, a non-resident senior fellow at Boston University’s Global Development Policy Center and associate member of the Faculty of History at the University of Oxford. In this post McCauley argues that comparing bitcoin to a Ponzi scheme is unfair to Ponzi schemes.

in reply to Mark Lansbury

Can’t happen with Bitcoin. Just sayin.


Debunked:

in reply to Mark Lansbury

Now it really gets kafkaesk. That "non-resident" and associate in "History", not economics, does not even know what a Ponzi scheme is.
How do you find such misleading pieces of opinion?

Here it is debunked, by looking at its definition:
https://www.lynalden.com/bitcoin-ponzi-scheme/

in reply to Mark Lansbury

Bitcoin is not crypto. Because the SEC would not allow a ponzi scheme to be an ETF, therefore Bitcoin is the only cryptocurrency which has ETFs approved.
And Trump whats Bitcoin as currency reserve for the US.
in reply to Mark Lansbury

Your posting history makes it clear that you are here on D* to suck others into the Bitcoin scam that you are profiteering from. I am just providing warnings to readers to counterbalance your spamming.
in reply to Mark Lansbury

Insults and allegations are not really a sign of good education, Adam. It weakens your point.
in reply to Mark Lansbury

These are not allegations nor are they insults. Your posting history speaks for itself. You are are consistently clearly here to promote Bitcoin. I am here to provide counterpoints, based on citing refs and facts.

You seem determined to try to confuse readers with claims like :

Bitcoin is not crypto.


The US Federal Trade Commission says it is: https://consumer.ftc.gov/articles/what-know-about-cryptocurrency-and-scams

in reply to Adam Hunt

@Adam Hunt To be sincere, doesn't matter what you think about bitcoin or Murkas, what he pointed out with his very first answer was simply that as of now no entity can prevent you from wiring your btc to another btc address.
And that is true,

The rest is basically BS talk, he said she said and third party citiations to make things look more or less true.

Maybe bitcoin is as a ponzi scheme like all the legal wall street investments, including the US-dollar itself ..
(I guess there is more than one view point that could reasonably argue this :)

in reply to Mark Lansbury

Maybe bitcoin is as a ponzi scheme like all the legal wall street investments,


You are contradicting yourself. If it is a ponzi scheme, it is against the law.