It would be a shame if surveillance cameras began to need surveillance cameras to protect them and in turn needed surveillance cameras to protect them and fairly soon it would turtles all the way down.
How could anyone do this? I mean, how exactly somebody could do this? Which terrible device model would they use? and how? That's so sad! Poor cameras.
Bekijk je favoriete video's, luister naar de muziek die je leuk vindt, upload originele content en deel alles met vrienden, familie en anderen op YouTube.
you can purchase relatively cheap Astronomical Lasers. They are designed to be used with your telescope. They are hot enough that the beam feels warm to the touch and will permanently warp/scar the optical lens of most cameras. They remain effective for this purpose at a range of about 100m. They are also useful against CCTV lenses and of course extremely dangerous to pig eyes.
xaxat
in reply to stux⚡️ • • •Christopher Brown
in reply to stux⚡️ • • •stux⚡️
in reply to Christopher Brown • • •Christopher Brown
in reply to stux⚡️ • • •Deus ex Machina
in reply to stux⚡️ • • •That's so sad!
Poor cameras.
The Sleight Doctor 🃏🍉
in reply to stux⚡️ • • •Unfortunately, a standard, legal 5mW laser pointer will only temporarily overexpose a Flock camera.
To do any permanent damage, you would most likely need a high-powered laser (over 500mW?) and they're not easy to procure.
Old Hippie Ⓥ Resistance!
in reply to stux⚡️ • • •Goose was not valued
in reply to stux⚡️ • • •#bennJordan has been making incredible videos about #flock cameras, rolling up to his city council with receipts, etc
His latest
youtu.be/S3MQLlMbS-Y
- YouTube
youtu.benboynorge
in reply to stux⚡️ • • •Bebadefabo
in reply to stux⚡️ • • •👽🐦🦇🐉💻
in reply to stux⚡️ • • •Thomas Traynor
in reply to stux⚡️ • • •Bluedepth
in reply to stux⚡️ • • •Leeloo
in reply to stux⚡️ • • •Of course you shouldn't.
Use industrial laser cutters.
Jason Petersen (he)
in reply to stux⚡️ • • •will it actually disable that much of the sensor?
Having to look at it to aid in aiming seems like an identification risk beyond just tearing it down from a blind angle.
Ianto Jones
in reply to stux⚡️ • • •YGGverse
in reply to stux⚡️ • • •Anti-surveillance clothing aims to hide wearers from facial recognition
Alex Hern (The Guardian)