Skip to main content


"What if there was a way for a business to transform any conduct it disliked into a felony, harnessing the power of the state to threaten anyone who acted in a way that displeased the company with a long prison sentence and six-figure fines?

Surprise! That actually exists! It's called Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the "#anticircumvention" clause, which establishes five-year sentences and $500k fines for anyone who bypasses an "effective access control" for a copyrighted work."

Let Cory (@pluralistic) explain it. He's good at explaining #enshittification, or as the rest of us call it, the 21st goddamn century.

As an aside, there should be a branch of the Judicial tree that is staffed by people who understand technology and the implications therein. (Just sayin, as someone who had thousands of pages of material stolen "fairly" for LLM.) These courts don't understand what they're ruling on.

#DMCA #copyright

in reply to MissConstrue

"(...)if you want to make a reaction video, then you, personally must create your own stream-ripper. You are not allowed to discuss how to do this with anyone else, and you can't share your stream-ripper with anyone else(...)" For reaction video, you can just stream the original content on a TV next to you. No stream-ripper is needed, and it is hard to imagine "access control" that could block it until we get "Black Mirror" style chips in our heads.
in reply to Zelgaav

@zelgaav All devices that support hdcp have to block analog outputs while protected content is playing. It is part of the hdcp key licensing scheme.