Skip to main content


Telegram is lying to you - here's the proof


in reply to archipc

This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to Artwork

You're right that Secret Chat isn't new — and I never claimed it was. The point is that default chats are NOT encrypted, and most users never touch Secret Chat. Knowing a feature exists ≠ using it. The "reveal" is for the average user who thinks Telegram = privacy by default. That's the real problem.
in reply to archipc

Telegram never claimed the default E2E exists. Nor it never ever suggested that in advertisings. They only stated that the protocol payload in non-secret chats is secure in traffic between open-source clients and their cloud, if ever monitored (e.g. MITM).

Those "average" who assume security don't need security but common sense and do their manual research prior trust random articles and "reveals" like yours, and this is what you should teach for if you have time for it and desire; this would at least be actually appreciated, valued, and make a dear change in the infinitely magnificent world, dear @archipc@lemmy.ml ...

If you will ever be actually interested, please check the following:

Telegram generates a long-term identifier, called auth_key_id, on every client device. This identifier does not change depending on where the client is connecting from.
Source: web.archive.org/web/2026032621…
This entry was edited (5 days ago)