I believe that, if this constitution is implemented flawlessly, it will make privacy a law of physics, reasoning can be found on question 13 of the Q/A, also listed bellow

Question 13
Will cultural drift or “voluntary” surveillance inevitably erode privacy (Right #1) over time?

No.

The constitution already makes such drift physically impossible.

Any monitoring of an innocent is permitted if and only if all five of the following are true at every instant:

1. The innocent has given explicit, time-bound consent for a short, fixed interval (default ≤ 86 400 seconds).
2. Consent must be actively renewed; silence or inaction immediately ends monitoring.
3. Revocation is possible at any moment via a single thought/command, with cessation within minimal physical latency.
4. Immediately before each renewal window closes, the ASI must remind the innocent — in a neutral, non-pressuring way — that non-renewal is free and carries no penalty.
5. Any external social, economic, or cultural pressure that would punish non-renewal is itself treated as coercion and neutralized under the standard trade-off rules.
   Under these rules (the only ones compatible with simultaneous preservation of Rights #1, #3, and #4), no innocent ever experiences monitoring as a Right #1 violation, and no drift into permanent surveillance is possible.

The ASI remains innocent because every millisecond of monitoring is backed by a fresh, revocable, fully informed, and socially uncoerced “yes”.

Privacy is mathematically enforced forever.