Which private (no cloud requirement) wireless home security cameras save footage locally without monthly subscription?
I tried wyze and find it silly how video clips are limited to 5 seconds unless you give them money every month. I want something where the footage is saved on a local sdcard/hdd without any cloud reliance.
Even better if I don't have to be locked into using the manufacturer's app, but I'm flexible on that.

PiraHxCx
in reply to StarryC • • •StarryC
in reply to PiraHxCx • • •PiraHxCx
in reply to StarryC • • •I hope someone here shows up with good modern options.
update method for DNS name servers
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)pricklypearbear
in reply to PiraHxCx • • •For OP. Reolink has a DVR and wireless type cameras.
However be careful on which cameras you get as not all the wireless versions work with the DVR. Think this is mostly the battery powered ones. Also not sure if this has changed since original purchase a few years back.
StarryC
in reply to pricklypearbear • • •Emil Muzz
in reply to StarryC • • •zeroghost
in reply to StarryC • • •ZoneMinder - Home
zoneminder.comStarryC
in reply to zeroghost • • •Em Adespoton
in reply to StarryC • • •I use TP Link C100 cameras in local network mode and a Reolink doorbell in a similar manner. Standard RTSP feeds and an internal mini web server, plus plenty of privacy controls.
Both of these products are pretty cheap considering their configurability — they do both provide the option to do the whole cloud subscription thing, but work fine for me without it. I have Home Assistant on the back end to manage live streams, but find I usually just read data off the internal SD card instead.
Cherry
in reply to StarryC • • •pleasejustdie
in reply to StarryC • • •qjkxbmwvz
in reply to StarryC • • •I would recommend PoE security cameras. You probably want support for RTSP / ONVIF.
I have some Amcrest cameras talking to Frigate. It is completely local---cameras on a separate VLAN that can't talk to the Internet, footage is recorded on a server running Frigate. Works very well for me. No vendor lock-in is also nice!
computer network protocol
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)StarryC
in reply to qjkxbmwvz • • •bl4kers
in reply to StarryC • • •blarth
in reply to StarryC • • •beepbooprobot
in reply to blarth • • •kylian0087
in reply to StarryC • • •Broken
in reply to StarryC • • •Cameras can be battery powered only, or use a solar panel for continual recharging or the battery.
The only flaw is the flaw with any wireless camera, that there is a delay from activity recognition to the record time. So you might miss something depending on your camera positioning.
Dnb
in reply to StarryC • • •paf
in reply to StarryC • • •If you don't already have device powerful enough to run frigate, I would advise to look for a mini pc with n100 or n150 processors, they are not very expensive (around 150€) and don't consume much electricity (close to raspberry pi 5 while being more powerful).
synestia
in reply to paf • • •paf
in reply to synestia • • •synestia
in reply to paf • • •kowcop
in reply to StarryC • • •melfie
in reply to kowcop • • •I have multiple Reolink cameras at this point and just have them recording to a SD card and blocked from the internet.
They have local ML models for human, animal and vehicle detection, so something like Frigate isn’t strictly necessary, though I haven’t bothered setting them up with Home Assistant yet and mainly use them with the Reolink app and VLC with RTSP. Sometimes, I unblock them from the internet temporarily if I’m going to need to access them remotely.
Lemmchen
in reply to StarryC • • •Thingino
thingino.com🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱
in reply to StarryC • • •Sarcasmo220
in reply to StarryC • • •pyr0ball
in reply to StarryC • • •Since nobody else has mentioned it yet, you can install a version of the firmware that enabled RTSP streaming, which you could point at a Linux server with an NVR application on it, or any consumer/commercial NVR with RTSP streaming enabled
support.wyze.com/hc/en-us/arti…
swelter_spark
in reply to StarryC • • •ef9357
in reply to StarryC • • •