The rise of ID/face scanning to access bars & clubs
TL;DR
ID scanning is becoming a more common requirement to access bars and clubs in Australia (and worldwide). A company called ScanTek is used in over 1,000 clubs in Aus and provides tools such as biometric-matching someone's face to an ID, detecting fake IDs, flagging people and sharing data with other venues automatically
As well as verifying ages, ScanTek boasts "collect marketing information from IDs and drivers licences, which business owners can use to target specific demographics with promotions" on its website in a pitch to business owners. Though they claim to not share any of this with third parties
Australia's privacy laws are vague, don't specify what can be collected and how it must be stored, and only say that companies shouldn't keep data for longer than is "reasonable"
ABC News
ABC News provides the latest news and headlines in Australia and around the world.Geraden Cann (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
like this

comrade_twisty
in reply to freedickpics • • •Weren’t they just complaining that the youth of today isn’t going out anymore?
Oblivious idiots!
Sure enough it all that data collected flows back to the US oligarchy / fascism machine - Thiel, Bezos, Zuck, Musk.
Nollij
in reply to comrade_twisty • • •Matt
in reply to freedickpics • • •captainlezbian
in reply to Matt • • •dai
in reply to captainlezbian • • •This is actually pretty minimal in Australia (as someone who has worked in Hospitality for 20+ years)
Very few venues actually require this to enter, the majority check at the door or once you ae inside the venue.
Edit: Some owners of multiple venues have rolled these systems out in the past that I've seen, generally ones that have seen a rise in patron issues. Its handy that if someone has caused issues in one place they won't get allowed into another; but it's not worth the privacy risk in my eyes.
Tempus Fugit
in reply to freedickpics • • •hector
in reply to Tempus Fugit • • •kablez
in reply to freedickpics • • •The worst part is all our data is stored on American servers run by megacorpos. ID information scanned by venue terminals is one, but even private health records and sensitive government documents are being chucked into Amazon S3, Azure/OneDrive and Dropbox.
The government should be prioritising secure, independent digital infrastructure but they're too busy giving our tax dollars to foreign consulting firms so they can build bad websites.
hector
in reply to kablez • • •Far from being a passive participant in our information being disseminated everywhere, they are actively undermining our privacy everywhere. They want our information, all of it, so they've made sure they can get it without warrants or judges or oversight, but so too can everyone else.
They've had their priorities all screwed up. That's what was so frustrating about the president railing against the "deep state," the bureaucracies are a problem and do need to be reigned in, he tapped into the anger on that, and trade, and will make those things worse not better. Only able to because the opposition party sold out to the rich and powerful.
kylian0087
in reply to freedickpics • • •despite_velasquez
in reply to freedickpics • • •Gold_E_Lox
in reply to despite_velasquez • • •small island, basically brainwashed to be bootlicking liberals. taught from our past we are bore from criminals to allow the people to imagine themselves as free, while our politics are only a few years behind the fascist rhetoric of the USA.
this gives Australia the perfect environment to perform little 'tests' on the population to see how a white liberal audience will react.
Snot Flickerman
in reply to freedickpics • • •In my state, they haven't had me come in to update my photo in nearly 10 years. I have both lost and then gained weight in that time, I have been balding, my hair is graying, and I have to wear glasses at all times while my photo doesn't have me in glasses. I have never had a passport and have only now been looking into getting one considering apparently a Real ID just isn't enough proof for citizenship apparently.
I can't imagine that the old blurry photo on my license would easily be matched to my current face. Seems like it would be easier for a human to make that determination.
errer
in reply to Snot Flickerman • • •Snot Flickerman
in reply to errer • • •extremeboredom
in reply to freedickpics • • •hector
in reply to extremeboredom • • •excursion22
in reply to freedickpics • • •Dr. Bob
in reply to excursion22 • • •wildbus8979
in reply to excursion22 • • •qwestjest78
in reply to freedickpics • • •Obi
in reply to qwestjest78 • • •Cherry
in reply to freedickpics • • •Phoenixz
in reply to freedickpics • • •And here we have the real reason why they want the scanning
Added security to keep the random asshole out, sure, but the marketing is the point. Fuck that shit, if rather not go out to a bar than this
partofthevoice
in reply to Phoenixz • • •“Oh, Mr.Doe, your application says you don’t drink but once a year. However, we see you went to Moe’s Tavern twice last year. Sorry, but we can’t cover the cost of your medicine with these application discrepancies present.”
dependencyinjection
in reply to partofthevoice • • •a4ng3l
in reply to dependencyinjection • • •Even here in Europe the right of access provided by gdpr might not reveal that bullshit: once the model has been training the atomic data is eventually purged…
NewNewAugustEast
in reply to dependencyinjection • • •HubertManne
in reply to freedickpics • • •tehn00bi
in reply to freedickpics • • •poweruser
in reply to freedickpics • • •