Huawei Produces 122TB SSD Using Proprietary Chip Packaging Technology
Huawei Produces 122TB SSD Using Proprietary Chip Packaging Technology
Huawei develops 122TB SSD using proprietary chip packaging technology amid semiconductor restrictions.pandaily.com
Korkki
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ • • •☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
in reply to Korkki • • •zeet
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ • • •PixTupy
in reply to zeet • • •BeMoreCareful
in reply to PixTupy • • •WhoIzDisIz
in reply to PixTupy • • •FTFY.
HAL_9_TRILLION
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ • • •Wouldn't it be great if this would benefit us, real people?
amazon: best I can do is 1TB SSD for $179.
m532
in reply to HAL_9_TRILLION • • •samsamsamsam
in reply to m532 • • •WhoIzDisIz
in reply to m532 • • •moriquende
in reply to m532 • • •ATS1312
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ • • •Anyone else convinced AES-256 is not long enough a but length for full disk encryption anymore? Even the 512-bit schemes are just trying some offset-salts that, with ~10TB I worry about providing close-enough statistical significance for cryptanalysis.
With 100TB drives?! I am less worried and more... convinced its a problem.
naeap
in reply to ATS1312 • • •I have to admit, that I never looked into the technical details of full disk encryption
If I understand you correctly, they are using the same key for all the data and with larger amounts of data statistical analysis becomes feasible
Did I get this right?
Couldn't that be solved by using a root key + salt per block/sector/file/whatever?
I'd still only need the one root key and with every block the actual encryption key changes
I was thinking about perfect forward secrecy and that was the first thing, I could come up with
But, I'm absolutely not a crypto/math guy, so probably I don't know enough to really add something to the discussion/solution...
WhoIzDisIz
in reply to ATS1312 • • •Miller
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ • • •WhoIzDisIz
in reply to Miller • • •Zerush
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ • • •☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
in reply to Zerush • • •WhoIzDisIz
in reply to Zerush • • •Zerush
in reply to WhoIzDisIz • • •Malgas
in reply to Zerush • • •Wait, I'm also old enough to remember 5.25" floppies, but I always thought the casings were some sort of flexible plastic. Were some of them just card stock, or were they all some sort of treated paper product?
Zerush
in reply to Malgas • • •FudgyMcTubbs
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ • • •WhoIzDisIz
in reply to FudgyMcTubbs • • •Chemical Wonka
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ • • •