Skip to main content

in reply to chobeat

Definition of sabotage in the article:

entering proprietary info into public AI chatbots, using unapproved AI tools, or intentionally using low-quality AI output in their work without fixing it


seems more of a design issue with the provided circumstances than active sabotage?

in reply to Chais

This is a pr piece designed to shift blame off of garbage llm outputs and onto the employees forced to use it against their will
in reply to chobeat

No sabotage required. It's typically poor tool with no strategy behind the so called deployment. AI snake oil salesmen claimed that AI could boost productivity AND be a scapegoat to cull the workforce, shareholders demand both, managers obliged, now the shit show is everywhere with no gains in sight.