Alibaba says newest Qwen AI model is second only to Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5
scmp.com/tech/article/3361119/…
Alibaba says newest Qwen AI model is second only to Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5
Preview reflects the latest phase in China’s AI push, as domestic labs chase parity with US heavyweights.Coco Feng (South China Morning Post)

mynameisbob
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ • • •P03 Locke
in reply to mynameisbob • • •kibiz0r
in reply to P03 Locke • • •Indeed, and as Cory Doctorow says: “The most important thing about a gadget isn’t what it does; it’s who it does it for and who it does it to.”
::: spoiler Tap for spoiler
Fuck AI
:::
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
in reply to mynameisbob • • •P03 Locke
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ • • •Communist
in reply to P03 Locke • • •P03 Locke
in reply to Communist • • •It does.
Except cost. Except open source. Except the entire fucking global economic trillion dollar US AI model.
Those are very big exceptions.
(Also, I'm mostly stealing from Yσɠƚԋσʂ's post.)
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
2026-07-17 04:40:52
Communist
in reply to P03 Locke • • •DeepSWE
DeepSWEDave.
in reply to P03 Locke • • •I'm just waiting for the closed-source AI industry to have their Black Swan moment.
Something's going to come out of left field from the open AI community and all that investment in proprietary models and mega-compute is going to be rendered useless.
eleitl
in reply to Dave. • • •ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
in reply to eleitl • • •You can run Claude Sonnet equivalent quantised models locally on much less RAM.
Local LLMs are close to being viable. We're almost at the point where they fit a Macbook.
nosuchanon
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ • • •Grapho
in reply to nosuchanon • • •nosuchanon
in reply to Grapho • • •Not really. I’m glad that China is copying AI models and providing them for cheaper usage or open sourcing the training.
I don’t believe any US company should monopolize the entirety of human knowledge.
ResistingArrest
in reply to nosuchanon • • •nosuchanon
in reply to ResistingArrest • • •latimes.com/business/story/202…
Basically one AI asks questions and records the answers to recreate training data without massive compute for training data.
China is copying U.S. AI models — American companies say it is costing them billions of dollars
Shirin Ghaffary (Los Angeles Times)ResistingArrest
in reply to nosuchanon • • •☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
in reply to nosuchanon • • •nosuchanon
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ • • •It’s not that complicated. Recreating training data via distillation is basically asking structured questions and recording the responses and reformatting that to use as cleaned “good” training data. Much less energy and compute intensive than creating the training data on your own.
I think I remember reading somewhere how Chinese research’s do this by basically using bots and spreading out the distillation to many source queries.
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
in reply to nosuchanon • • •The process takes time because even when you're distilling answers, you still need to actually do reinforcement training on the model. And given that Fable and GPT 5.6 just came out there simply hasn't been much time to do that. However, models like Kimi also do better than Fable or GPT on a lot of tasks, which means it's not just distillation but also difference in architecture. You can watch to see how Kimi was actually trained and why it performs well.
It's also absolutely hilarious that people think only Chinese companies use distillation, as if Anthropic or OpenAI are above that or something. Not to mention that they basically ignored copyrights on all the data the siphoned and are now crying that people aren't respecting their terms of use.
- YouTube
www.youtube.comnosuchanon
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ • • •