Skip to main content

in reply to ashenone

Depends, are you China? Because if not, then probably not.
This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Everyone knows it's cheaper to wait for humans to reproduce and grow (and die in shitty preventable conditions) than it is to invest your manpower in constant reindustrialization.

I think that was the lesson of the US Civil War.

in reply to TribblesBestFriend

Clearly not, because the US has the biggest population of prison slaves on the planet and shit is still wildly expensive here
in reply to RiverRock

Largest recorded. China just doesn't admit even in the face of evidence that have. Hear me out, radical take here, both are fucked up for this and it's a stain on both nations that ultimately make both worse for it
in reply to fruitycoder

This is a classic trope of American apologia. You pick a thing where we're clearly the worst, then just say that (Other country) is probably worse than us, but just expertly lying and hiding it, and hey both are bad and there's totally evidence (no evidence provided) so really there's no point in differentiating between these two totally equivalent things (that are incredibly different) and the correct answer is to be above it all (never having to admit you're wrong).

It's the final layer of imperial propaganda. Nobody can say with a straight face that the US is good anymore, so we cope by saying that everyone else is secretly just as bad or worse, so why bother taking a side?

in reply to RiverRock

Its imperial propaganda to say slavery is wrong? To take the side of the oppressed against the oppressor no matter who they are? Really? You know there are more sides then just those in control of the state in both the US and Chinese governments right?
in reply to fruitycoder

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to RiverRock

Not everyone and not even everyone in either state is "the oppressor". Their are clear factions that are in clear cases. Mind you this thread STARTED with a callout of slavery in China, was whataboutismed to include modern American slavery.

Again yes there are more sides. You say we, are the oppressor, but you're alone in that in this back and forth, I am actually opposed. I vote, organize, boycott, strike, etc against it. There are people in China that vote, organize, boycott, strike, etc against it. Me and them, and the many others around the world are on the same side here.

Its defeatist to just accept evil. Call it out. Its not normal. Its not ok. Its a decision made by some people and we should disempowet those that make those decisions and empower everyone else to be able to fight back however we can

in reply to fruitycoder

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to RiverRock

You are excusing it. You are, in this thread, are tolerating it. If you want to focus on this US issue, go for it, but that doesn't mean dismissing another issue, and as you describe it intentionally watering down the very real problem of both issues.
in reply to fruitycoder

You are excusing it


"It" being something that doesn't exist

You are, in this thread, are tolerating it


"It" being something that doesn't exist

you want to focus on this US issue, go for it


Thanks, I will

but that doesn’t mean dismissing another issue,


An issue that doesn't exist

and as you describe it intentionally watering down the very real problem of both issues.


"Chinese slavery is super real bro, you gotta believe me. No I will not be backing up my jingoist hunch with anything, why do you hate justice?"

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to RiverRock

You don't want evidence, so there is no evidence I could possibly provide to convince you.
in reply to fruitycoder

You don't have shit, or usa would have blasted it all over their propaganda rags thousand times over already
in reply to fruitycoder

It's amazing how you never provided evidence at all lmfao. Get ready to learn Chinese, buddy
in reply to fruitycoder

Its defeatist to just accept evil. Call it out. Its not normal. Its not ok.


Why do y'all libs write like you're auditioning for speechwriter in The West Wing lmao. Dork behaviour.

in reply to fruitycoder

It's imperial propaganda to project the proven sins of the empire onto the enemies of empire without proof. The empire justifies itself by demonizing its enemies and delegitimizing support for any actual alternative to its reign.
in reply to TribblesBestFriend

🎶Nimble little fingers give a homey antique touch but the really big advantage of enslaving little children is you don't have to pay them much🎶
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Are you saying that the current USA administration is in favor of forced child labor, and that link proves it? I don’t see it.
in reply to locuester

I'm saying that the burger reich has always been in favor of child labor, as anybody who's not a complete troll would know.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

No no those kids giving up education in order to keep their family afloat aren't being coerced or forced at all /s

The US admin also repeal anti slavery laws for migrant workers couldn't have more blatant on how they actually feel about the working class. The anti immigrant retoric here about "jobs" has always been a lie

in reply to FatVegan

Not so pointless when the burger reich is surrounding you with military bases.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

this is what it looks like when your military procurement isn't centered around the profit motive
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

I've read analysts who say that the price is unrealistically low. I think the same.
in reply to eleitl

That's right, if one thing western analysts are famous for it's never being wrong about China's tech capabilities.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

It's economics. Materials and even the fuel used by hypersonics (as in maneuvrable high-Mach glide vehicle) have a certain price tag, even in China.
100 kUSD buys far too little of that, even in Russia and China.
in reply to eleitl

wait until you learn about economies of scale and the benefits of controlling the entire supply chain
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Russia has that too, nevertheless Kinzhal and Kalibr (which are lower-Mach and don't carry a hypersonic glider stage) are both about 10 MUSD.
Just the costs of JP-10/decilin are considerable already.

Depending on the specs, I'd assume the price to be a few MUSD, never under 100 kUSD.

in reply to eleitl

Chinese industry and technical expertise absolutely dwarfs Russia
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

In hypersonics Russia currently has a lead over China. Obviously they're going to catch up rather soon.
in reply to eleitl

Hypersonics cover a wide range of stuff, what this article discusses are cheap low end missiles as opposed to something like Oreshnik.
in reply to eleitl

Chinas economy buff is crazy. If you could compare the buffs between US Logistics and China Economy, I think you’d be surprised. In both cases, they are capable of witchcraft.
in reply to eleitl

Even if it's 10 times more expensive it's still half to quarter price of Tomahawk missile.