Skip to main content

in reply to Chris Remington

I fail to understand how this is different from the status quo. Like, pure slop is ruled out, but it should have been in the first place.
in reply to Powderhorn

Sometimes you have to just right it down to save time arguing later.
in reply to sik0fewl

As an editor, I'm not going to point out the egregious error here.
in reply to sik0fewl

That was the write thing to do.
This entry was edited (6 days ago)
in reply to Chris Remington

TL;DR: The two exceptions are for refining the writer’s text and for translation
in reply to byte_0verflow

Didn't they actually "discover" that translating (and refining) introduces huge errors?