Skip to main content


Meta is rapidly reorganizing its workers’ jobs around AI: ‘Transfers aren’t optional’


in reply to Powderhorn

Thank goodness. Meta can't collapse on itself quickly enough. Hopefully some of those engineers will be distracted from crafting spyware, for awhile.
in reply to pinball_wizard

This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to tal

I’m wondering if that has something to do with the reshuffle. If they move 1000 people onto a dead end team they might be able to lay them off easier
in reply to tal

Yes. I would imagine gathering data to sell to Epstein's customers to guide their kidnappers could pay rather nicely, whether or not Meta staff realize the data they collect and sell could be used that way.

And I suppose AI adds heaps of deniability, which could be helpful whenever Meta's best customers end up in court...for whatever reason.

This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Powderhorn

The yahoo of our time.
This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Powderhorn

Totally misread that as "Transfems" aren't optional. I always thought transfems were more into cybersecurity anyway.
in reply to Powderhorn

“The pace of what we are building is unprecedented, and these are exactly the kind of challenges that define what we do best.”


What is it that you do best though? What do you sell?

Moving 1000 engineers to a “data labeling team” and calling it applied AI basically seems like demoting 1000 engineers to non-engineering roles, I’d be insulted but people working for Meta in 2026 probably don’t have a lot of pride to lose. Seems like most AI companies outsource the labelling stuff so I wonder how Meta is justifying paying people engineering salaries to do it.

in reply to reallykindasorta

There are ways to label data that aren't just humans selecting from a word list. The quality of that labeling is then dependent on the quality of the process you use to create it, but that can be good enough that it has value. Sometimes it's just starting from a known good/easy label and tracking the thing it's attached to forward or backward in a video.
in reply to Powderhorn

Well, what else would those engineers work on? Most of Meta's product lines are either stable or dead. If they weren't going to AI, they would just be going away.
in reply to Powderhorn

I was recently reminded that the advances at PARC and Bell Labs weren’t directed from the top down - they were simply smart people given the job of “build something neat”.

Top down, forceful R&D is probably not going to be terrifically successful.