Skip to main content

in reply to Chris Remington

How does Apple's bug affect Signal messages? Is it just notifications?

Yeah it was.

in reply to Mark with a Z

It was more than just notifications as it has been pointed out by another user in this thread
in reply to Chris Remington

What actual news did I miss that triggered the half a dozen fake hacked/bug articles regarding Signal I read in the last 48 hours?
in reply to Chris Remington

Wouldn't call it fake, but I can see how someone would feel a bit cheated by this headline. I do mildly.
in reply to LibertyLizard

A bug in Apple's notification system allowed extraction even when the message that triggered the notification was deleted.

This means access you any text you got. This means a list of any incoming calls. This means all your appointments that your phone reminded you of.

And instead we get a story about deleted Signal messages, prominently featuring Signal in the thumbnail and picture while failing to mention any of the other implications of that Apple-specific bug.

How is that accurate or even just sane reporting? Either it's an incredibly stupid take or there is an actual agenda focusing on Signal here. And when I see several of those (including stuff like people falling for phishing attempts and giving away access to their devices being reported as "Hackers getting access to Signal account") within just a few days I tend to assume the latter.

This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Ooops

The people trying to destroy privacy really want Signal to get smeared and go away. Any time any kind of scandal shows up where Signal was being used it's always a headline in this light when the majority I have all seen are due to user error and/or stupidity.
in reply to Ooops

The court case being reported on was specifically about how the FBI recovered messages from Signal by exploiting a bug in apples notification system. You should not be struggling this hard to understand what context is.
in reply to Chris Remington

This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Ooops

Agreed, this is very weird that signal is being mentioned at all.
in reply to teawrecks

Not at all, if you actually read the article, in which the connection to Signal is laid out clearly.
in reply to Ooops

What’s reason we are talking about Signal here.


That's very easy to answer. Signal comes up here because that's what actually happened in the case that brought the bug to light.

The FBI recovered message content from the Apple notification service that happened to come from Signal, and used it to secure a conviction against people who used Signal in planning their anti-ICE activities

Unlucky for Signal from a PR perspective but that's just what actually happened, so people write about that rather than hypotheticals where other encrypted messaging apps would have suffered the same issue.

This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Ooops

Apple was saving notifications on the device storage, which provides a way for forensics to extract some of the past messages.
in reply to henfredemars

Wasn't my point. What's going on with Signal to tell the story of accessing deleted Signal messages (and multiple other Signal hack/ bug/exploit headlines I'vs seen within a short time frame) when this is exactly zero about Signal?
This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Ooops

I remember an article (read it somewhere around 10 days ago) where something was used to access Signal messages of a defendant in a case regarding an attack (shooting I think) on a ICE concentration camp. Might be this, but I'm not sure.