The US government just banned consumer routers made outside the US
The US government just banned consumer routers made outside the US
The FCC has added all foreign-made consumer routers to its Covered List, which effectively bans all future ones from import into the US.Sean Hollister (The Verge)
like this

NeatNit
in reply to along_the_road • • •To be honest, this is probably justified. My knee-jerk reaction was "oh look, USA in antagonizing everyone else again", but consumer routers are a really significant security junction which historically has always been somewhat neglected. I only read a few sentences before the paywall stopped me, but sounds like they'll whitelist any foreign manufacturers that are legitimate.
Yes, it's gonna have corruption and bribes all over it.. But on paper, it's justified.
like this
Azathoth likes this.
Cris_Citrus
in reply to NeatNit • • •I hope things like hardware made by/for openwrt remain available, but it sounds like they will cease to be?
My first thought was the risk of the us demanding us manufacturers include a backdoor
It sounds like the exemption for foreign companies is an option while they create plans for american manufacturing
Successful_Try543
in reply to Cris_Citrus • • •It seems like professional equipment will not be affected:
floofloof
in reply to Successful_Try543 • • •ExoticCherryPigeon
in reply to floofloof • • •Cris_Citrus
in reply to Successful_Try543 • • •I'm not sure their like bananapi based router would be considered professional. More home tinkerer
I'm not sure what that'll mean for the impact of this change, but I guess we'll see 🤷🏻♂️
definitemaybe
in reply to Cris_Citrus • • •Yeah, I'm not too worried for enthusiasts. imho, this is a bigger deal for the 99% of the rest of everyone. So, like, kinda a big deal.
And, like, the erosion of civil liberties and human rights, and the rise of fascism. If you care about those.
Successful_Try543
in reply to NeatNit • • •You're right, but simply shifting the production from overseas to US doesn't inherently make the routers more secure. The article mentions the lack of software updates for discontinued products as a big threat that has been exploited in the past.
Fortunately, there is no paywall for me. Here is the article on archive.org.
No, the article mentions only one exception:
The US government just banned consumer routers made outside the US
Sean Hollister (The Verge)B0rax
in reply to NeatNit • • •What? Because companies from other countries are evil? What makes you think that companies in your own country are better?
Why does the country even matter?
NeatNit
in reply to B0rax • • •I'm not from the US. And I think the way they're trying to tackle it is stupid, roughly for the reasons you say. But on a surface level it's good that there is some action taken on this matter.
The country does matter. It allows oversight and regulation to a greater extent. And if it turns out that there's a backdoor in a router, if it's made locally there will be someone to criminally charge, whereas if it's made in China or wherever, that would be impossible.
Then again, it's the US, so they'd probably charge some random worker instead of the CEO who demanded the back door be implemented.
B0rax
in reply to NeatNit • • •What kind of oversight are you talking about? Locally produced items do not need to fulfill more regulations.
If this was about cyber security there would be a mandatory certification (like there is for emc, like the FCC). But blanket statements like „foreign company bad!“ don’t do anything for increasing cyber security
kibiz0r
in reply to B0rax • • •teawrecks
in reply to B0rax • • •It's just another routine fascist strategy:
kibiz0r
in reply to NeatNit • • •OwOarchist
in reply to along_the_road • • •Cris_Citrus
in reply to OwOarchist • • •Successful_Try543
in reply to OwOarchist • • •Scrubbles
in reply to OwOarchist • • •dfi
in reply to Scrubbles • • •Ooops
in reply to dfi • • •Scrubbles
in reply to Ooops • • •Darkassassin07
in reply to along_the_road • • •drdalek
in reply to Darkassassin07 • • •Hux
in reply to Darkassassin07 • • •Probably not. The goal isn’t to sell American routers.
The goal is to sell routers to Americans with government back doors built-in.
Any companies with approval will be providing that back door.
like this
HarkMahlberg likes this.
sanzky
in reply to Hux • • •like this
HarkMahlberg likes this.
Hux
in reply to sanzky • • •RamenJunkie
in reply to Darkassassin07 • • •𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
in reply to RamenJunkie • • •RamenJunkie
in reply to 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘 • • •They want you to think this but most Made in the USA consoiracies are just imports from Russia and are actually "Assembled in the USA."
But market research shows the Idiots prefer the "Made in the USA" branding.
trackball_fetish
in reply to along_the_road • • •orca
in reply to along_the_road • • •seathru
in reply to along_the_road • • •The US government just banned consumer routers made outside the US
Sean Hollister (The Verge)like this
SuiXi3D likes this.
Hux
in reply to along_the_road • • •Kwakigra
in reply to along_the_road • • •GrindingGears
in reply to Kwakigra • • •Kwakigra
in reply to GrindingGears • • •GrindingGears
in reply to Kwakigra • • •I noticed both yesterday mine is actually working again. I'm in Canada if that makes any difference. But it's definitely haunting.
Honestly even ignoring all this for a second, I fucking hate those eero routers. OMFG. They have turned me into a slobbering ragging lunatic on more than one occasion. I just fucking hate routers as a whole, they've always been demon devices, but these ones especially can fucking blow up anytime.
Kwakigra
in reply to GrindingGears • • •GrindingGears
in reply to Kwakigra • • •zebidiah
in reply to along_the_road • • •𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
in reply to along_the_road • • •Friggin verge and their paywall. Here's the text. Sorry for the poor formatting.
The US government just banned consumer routers made outside the USThe US claims foreign-made routers pose national security risks.
by
Sean Hollister
Mar 23, 2026, 6:47 PM EDT
is a senior editor and founding member of The Verge who covers gadgets, games, and toys. He spent 15 years editing the likes of CNET, Gizmodo, and Engadget.
In December, the Federal Communications Commission banned all future drones made in foreign countries from being imported into the United States, unless or until their maker gets an exemption. Now, the FCC has done the exact same for consumer networking gear, citing “an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States and to the safety and security of U.S. persons.”
If you already have a Wi-Fi or wired router, you can keep on using it — and companies that have already gotten FCC radio authorization for a specific foreign-made product can continue to import that product.
But since the vast majority
... Show more...Friggin verge and their paywall. Here's the text. Sorry for the poor formatting.
The US government just banned consumer routers made outside the USThe US claims foreign-made routers pose national security risks.
by
Sean Hollister
Mar 23, 2026, 6:47 PM EDT
is a senior editor and founding member of The Verge who covers gadgets, games, and toys. He spent 15 years editing the likes of CNET, Gizmodo, and Engadget.
In December, the Federal Communications Commission banned all future drones made in foreign countries from being imported into the United States, unless or until their maker gets an exemption. Now, the FCC has done the exact same for consumer networking gear, citing “an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States and to the safety and security of U.S. persons.”
If you already have a Wi-Fi or wired router, you can keep on using it — and companies that have already gotten FCC radio authorization for a specific foreign-made product can continue to import that product.
But since the vast majority — if not all — consumer routers are manufactured outside the United States, the vast majority of future consumer routers are now banned. By adding all foreign-made consumer routers to its Covered List, the FCC is saying it will no longer authorize their radios, which de facto bans new devices from import into the country.
Now, router makers need to A) secure a “conditional approval” that lets them keep getting new products cleared for US entry while they work to convince the government that they’ll open up manufacturing in the US, or B) make the decision to skip selling future products in the US, like dronemaker DJI already did.
Like with the foreign drone ban, the FCC has a National Security Determination that it says justifies these actions, one which claims that “Allowing routers produced abroad to dominate the U.S. market creates unacceptable economic, national security, and cybersecurity risks,” and that “routers produced abroad were directly implicated in the Volt, Flax, and Salt Typhoon cyberattacks which targeted critical American communications, energy, transportation, and water infrastructure.”
“Given the criticality of routers to the successful functioning of our nation’s economy and defense, the United States can no longer depend on foreign nations for router manufacturing,” reads another passage.
It is true that a great many router vulnerabilities have surfaced over the years, which make them a popular target for hackers and botnets. It is also true that one China-founded company, TP-Link, is dominant in the US consumer market; US authorities had previously considered a specific TP-Link ban due to that dominance and national security concerns. (TP-Link has been attempting to distance itself from China, splitting off from the Chinese entity in 2022, establishing a global headquarters in California in 2024, and suing Netgear in 2025 for suggesting that TP-Link had been infiltrated by the Chinese government.)
It is not clear how simply moving production of routers domestically would make them safer. In the Volt Typhoon hack, Chinese state-sponsored hackers primarily targeted Cisco and Netgear routers, routers designed by US companies, according to the Department of Justice. They were vulnerable because those US companies had stopped providing security updates to the specific targeted routers, which had been discontinued by those companies.
While the FCC’s Covered List makes it sound like the US is banning all “routers produced in a foreign country,” it’s defined a bit more narrowly than that. It’s specifically banning “consumer-grade routers” as defined in NIST Internal Report 8425A, which refers to ones “intended for residential use and can be installed by the customer.”
“Virtually all routers are made outside the United States, including those produced by U.S.-based companies like TP-Link, which manufactures its products in Vietnam,” reads part of a statement from TP-Link via third-party spokesperson Ricca Silverio. “It appears that the entire router industry will be impacted by the FCC’s announcement concerning new devices not previously authorized by the FCC.”
Update, March 23rd: Clarified how TP-Link has distanced itself from China, and added company statement.