ChatGPT to start showing ads in the US
Who didn't see this coming? I swear, all we produce as a country is bullshit and ads to cover it up.
ChatGPT will start including advertisements beside answers for US users as OpenAI seeks a new revenue stream.The ads will be tested first in ChatGPT for US users only, the company announced on Friday, after increasing speculation that the San Francisco firm would turn to a potential cashflow model on top of its current subscriptions.
The ads will start in the coming weeks and will be included above or below, rather than within, answers. Mock-ups circulated by the company show the ads in a tinted box. They will be served to adult users “when there’s a relevant sponsored product or service based on your current conversation”, according to OpenAI’s announcement. Ads will not be shown to users under 18 and will not appear alongside answers related to sensitive topics such as health, mental health or politics. Users will be able to click to learn about why they received a particular ad, according to OpenAI.
ChatGPT to start showing ads in the US
Ads to be placed alongside answers as OpenAI looks to beef up revenue for flagship AI productRobert Booth (The Guardian)
like this

Chris Remington
in reply to Powderhorn • • •like this
deliriousdreams, HarkMahlberg and yessikg like this.
Powderhorn
in reply to Chris Remington • • •TheButtonJustSpins
in reply to Powderhorn • • •like this
yessikg likes this.
Powderhorn
in reply to TheButtonJustSpins • • •Godort
in reply to Powderhorn • • •I wonder if this is going to affect all those companies that have ChatGPT-powered customer agents.
It would be very funny to receive an ad for a competitor while trying to get help for something from the company that makes it.
like this
deliriousdreams likes this.
dan
in reply to Godort • • •like this
Hexanimo and deliriousdreams like this.
cronenthal
in reply to Powderhorn • • •like this
deliriousdreams and HarkMahlberg like this.
Powderhorn
in reply to cronenthal • • •dan
in reply to Powderhorn • • •skarn
in reply to dan • • •like this
deliriousdreams, HarkMahlberg and yessikg like this.
darkkite
in reply to skarn • • •organizations buying by the dozens is good for openai and it shows they can get cash flow vs free users that are only taking up resources.
it's probably going to be like youtube
definitemaybe
in reply to darkkite • • •OpenAI has a snowball's chance in hell of surviving. LLMs cost a lot of compute. They're burning through cash. Operating costs are more than double revenue. Their net operational losses are about $1 million USD every 40 minutes.
And somehow they're trying to put half a trillion USD into building more datacentres to make even more advanced models, which will be even more compute intensive.
Meanwhile, as venture capital has been committed to a whole series of AI companies and data centres, venture capital is dying up. Nobody has gotten a payout yet, since there's no path to profitability for any of these companies.
And it's coming to a head this fall, when OpenAI needs to pay their suppliers for the expansion they're building, and there's no reason to believe they'll be able to raise enough more investment to cover their costs.
It doesn't even take OpenAI failing, either. There's so much debt ("leverage") and circular cashflow going on in this space, between the AI companies, data centres, computer hardware manufacturers, and constr
... Show more...OpenAI has a snowball's chance in hell of surviving. LLMs cost a lot of compute. They're burning through cash. Operating costs are more than double revenue. Their net operational losses are about $1 million USD every 40 minutes.
And somehow they're trying to put half a trillion USD into building more datacentres to make even more advanced models, which will be even more compute intensive.
Meanwhile, as venture capital has been committed to a whole series of AI companies and data centres, venture capital is dying up. Nobody has gotten a payout yet, since there's no path to profitability for any of these companies.
And it's coming to a head this fall, when OpenAI needs to pay their suppliers for the expansion they're building, and there's no reason to believe they'll be able to raise enough more investment to cover their costs.
It doesn't even take OpenAI failing, either. There's so much debt ("leverage") and circular cashflow going on in this space, between the AI companies, data centres, computer hardware manufacturers, and construction companies, that any one of them failing could cause cascading failures, like dominoes. Worse than the '08 financial crash, most likely.
So no. It's not going to be like YouTube. YouTube is cheap to run, compared to LLMs.
And the worst part of it all: LLMs aren't even very good! It creates an illusion of productivity, but it's all bullshit, either doing a shitty job, or taking more time to prompt fondle than it would have taken to do the job by hand, or building up tech debt that's going to make massive projects unmaintainable.
It has some use cases, sure. I use it almost daily, tbh. But only because someone else is footing the bill. It doesn't produce nearly enough value to justify its costs.
Powderhorn
in reply to definitemaybe • • •dan
in reply to skarn • • •cron
in reply to Powderhorn • • •like this
deliriousdreams and HarkMahlberg like this.
morto
in reply to cron • • •like this
yessikg likes this.
jnod4
in reply to cron • • •cron
in reply to jnod4 • • •like this
deliriousdreams likes this.
skarn
in reply to cron • • •Powderhorn
in reply to jnod4 • • •cronenthal
in reply to cron • • •like this
yessikg likes this.
Marshezezz
in reply to Powderhorn • • •like this
YoSoySnekBoi, deliriousdreams, HarkMahlberg and yessikg like this.
horn_e4_beaver
in reply to Powderhorn • • •like this
deliriousdreams, HarkMahlberg and yessikg like this.
Rhoeri
in reply to Powderhorn • • •like this
deliriousdreams, HarkMahlberg and yessikg like this.
danh2os
in reply to Powderhorn • • •belated_frog_pants
in reply to Powderhorn • • •like this
yessikg likes this.
its_me_xiphos
in reply to Powderhorn • • •Powderhorn
in reply to its_me_xiphos • • •solomonschuler
in reply to Powderhorn • • •yessikg likes this.