You Are Being Misled About Renewable Energy Technology [Technology Connections]
It was challenging to figure out where to put this. It's also environment, and it turns sharply political for Act III.
If you're already familiar with renewables, there's not a lot to learn here but the comparisons with fossil fuels and ethanol. Given that I've been on solar since 2023, I appreciated what he was saying to the uninitiated.
Get yourself some Act II if you plan on making it all the way through ... it's an hour and a half.
- YouTube
Bekijk je favoriete video's, luister naar de muziek die je leuk vindt, upload originele content en deel alles met vrienden, familie en anderen op YouTube.www.youtube.com
like this

corsicanguppy
in reply to Powderhorn • • •Powderhorn
in reply to corsicanguppy • • •like this
deliriousdreams and DaGeek247 like this.
Steve
in reply to corsicanguppy • • •This is what Kagi says:
jonathan
in reply to Steve • • •"Touches" for 20 straight minutes
like this
TVA likes this.
photonic_sorcerer
in reply to jonathan • • •like this
TVA and yessikg like this.
eleitl
in reply to Steve • • •Problem is, this isn't even wrong. Electricity is only useful for some things. Energy carriers are not necessarily fungible. Conversion isn't free.
Another unfortunate thing: current renewable infrastructure cannot be built without fossil fuels we're in the process of running out of.
dadarobot
in reply to corsicanguppy • • •this is youtube's ai summary:
\
The video discusses the advantages of renewable energy technologies, primarily focusing on solar and wind power, compared to traditional fossil fuels like oil and natural gas (0:00).
Here's a breakdown of the key points:
Disposable vs. Durable Energy (1:19): The video highlights that petroleum is a "disposable" energy source, meaning it's burned once and gone. In contrast, renewable energy infrastructure like solar panels and wind turbines are durable, one-time investments that generate free energy for decades.
Cost Comparison: Cars (10:14): The speaker compares the lifetime fuel cost of a gasoline-powered car (Nissan Cube) to the cost of installing solar panels to power an electric car (Hyundai Ioniq 5). He demonstrates that the money spent on gasoline for one car could purchase enough solar panels to power several homes for decades, or completely cover an electric car's lifetime energy costs (18:59).
Solar Farms and Economics (22:33): The video explains that solar farms have virtually no operating costs (OPEX) once
... Show more...this is youtube's ai summary:
\
The video discusses the advantages of renewable energy technologies, primarily focusing on solar and wind power, compared to traditional fossil fuels like oil and natural gas (0:00).
Here's a breakdown of the key points:
Disposable vs. Durable Energy (1:19): The video highlights that petroleum is a "disposable" energy source, meaning it's burned once and gone. In contrast, renewable energy infrastructure like solar panels and wind turbines are durable, one-time investments that generate free energy for decades.
Cost Comparison: Cars (10:14): The speaker compares the lifetime fuel cost of a gasoline-powered car (Nissan Cube) to the cost of installing solar panels to power an electric car (Hyundai Ioniq 5). He demonstrates that the money spent on gasoline for one car could purchase enough solar panels to power several homes for decades, or completely cover an electric car's lifetime energy costs (18:59).
Solar Farms and Economics (22:33): The video explains that solar farms have virtually no operating costs (OPEX) once built, making them highly profitable. They can sell electricity at a lower price than natural gas plants and still generate healthy profits, which can be reinvested to build more solar farms.
Land Use for Solar (30:35): Addressing concerns about the land area required for solar farms, the video points out that a significant portion of agricultural land in the US is used to grow corn for ethanol, which is a far less efficient energy source than solar power. Converting just a quarter of this corn-for-ethanol land to solar farms could generate more electricity than the entire US grid currently produces annually (35:56).
Wind Power (38:29): Wind turbines are presented as another effective renewable energy source, capable of generating substantial power even on cloudy days and at night. The video likens their energy output to continuously "spitting out gasoline" (39:56).
Materials in Solar Panels (41:17): The video details that solar panels are primarily made of abundant materials like aluminum, glass, and adhesives, with the actual silicon cells being extremely thin. This contrasts with the constant extraction of raw materials for disposable fossil fuels.
Battery Technology (50:52): The video addresses concerns about batteries used with renewable energy, emphasizing their longevity (up to 5,000 charge cycles) and the ongoing advancements in battery chemistry that are extending lifespans, lowering costs, and reducing the need for rare materials.
Conclusion (1:02:41): The speaker concludes that based on economic realities and long-term thinking, renewable energy paired with energy storage is the most sensible and cost-effective path forward, and that misinformation surrounding it often comes from those protecting vested interests.
psx_crab
in reply to dadarobot • • •like this
TVA likes this.
Zagorath
in reply to psx_crab • • •It's a 90 minute video. If you can't read 420 words (nice) in summary of a 90 minute video, the problem isn't the length of the summary.
That said, the summary does have other problems. Notably: it stops at the fake-out ending at 1:02:41, missing a full third of the video, wherein he starts getting more explicitly political and takes a strong anti-Republican, anti-ICE, anti-mainstream media conformity with the above stance, and explicitly endorses getting involved in politics including voting for Democrats not because they're good, but because a literal wet towel would be a good option compared to the alternative.
He details Jimmy Carter putting water heating solar panels on the White House, and Reagan taking them down. Compares it to Biden passing the Inflation Reduction Act, which included renewable energy funding, and Trump illegally using an executive order to ignore that. He talks about the erosion of the 1st, 2nd, and 4th amendment rights in America. He quotes an essay critiquing King George prior to America's independence, and points out the exact same words app
... Show more...It's a 90 minute video. If you can't read 420 words (nice) in summary of a 90 minute video, the problem isn't the length of the summary.
That said, the summary does have other problems. Notably: it stops at the fake-out ending at 1:02:41, missing a full third of the video, wherein he starts getting more explicitly political and takes a strong anti-Republican, anti-ICE, anti-mainstream media conformity with the above stance, and explicitly endorses getting involved in politics including voting for Democrats not because they're good, but because a literal wet towel would be a good option compared to the alternative.
He details Jimmy Carter putting water heating solar panels on the White House, and Reagan taking them down. Compares it to Biden passing the Inflation Reduction Act, which included renewable energy funding, and Trump illegally using an executive order to ignore that. He talks about the erosion of the 1st, 2nd, and 4th amendment rights in America. He quotes an essay critiquing King George prior to America's independence, and points out the exact same words apply perfectly to Trump, before endorsing getting involved in Democratic primaries and voting Democrat in the mid-terms, and complains about lies like "non-citizens are voting" and "other countries will pay for our tariffs".
He praises protesters in Minnesota, and endorses getting involved in on-the-ground organising and caring about other people.
like this
HarkMahlberg and TVA like this.
Powderhorn
in reply to Zagorath • • •like this
TVA likes this.
P03 Locke
in reply to Zagorath • • •Irvine Fantasy No
in reply to dadarobot • • •like this
HarkMahlberg and TVA like this.
Powderhorn
in reply to Irvine Fantasy No • • •like this
TVA likes this.
ɔiƚoxɘup
in reply to Powderhorn • • •Powderhorn
in reply to ɔiƚoxɘup • • •ɔiƚoxɘup
in reply to Powderhorn • • •Powderhorn
in reply to ɔiƚoxɘup • • •Basically, there are three possible outcomes. The preferred one when you flip that master switch is that everything works.
The second is that nothing happens, and now you have to figure out what the fuck has gone wrong.
The third is an electrical fire.
ɔiƚoxɘup
in reply to Powderhorn • • •The best part is if the third happens it doesn't necessarily happen immediately. It might just happen while you're sleeping.
Wheeeeeeee!
Shadow
in reply to corsicanguppy • • •like this
Badabinski, Lasslinthar, SolacefromSilence, TVA and yessikg like this.
HarkMahlberg
in reply to corsicanguppy • • •like this
HarkMahlberg likes this.
dylanmorgan
in reply to corsicanguppy • • •ITT: deliberately unhelpful comments.
You know why text summaries are good? If I read a thesis statement and go “yup, I agree with the thesis and know enough about the major points raised to skip this” I save NINETY FUCKING MINUTES of my life. Alternatively, if I see something in the summary that piques my interest, I can watch the video to get more detail.
like this
TVA likes this.
turdburglar
in reply to dylanmorgan • • •like this
HarkMahlberg and TVA like this.
HarkMahlberg
in reply to dylanmorgan • • •like this
HarkMahlberg and TVA like this.
dylanmorgan
in reply to HarkMahlberg • • •P03 Locke
in reply to dylanmorgan • • •P03 Locke
in reply to dylanmorgan • • •I save 2 hours of my life by not watching a movie and not being entertained by an experience. But then I'm just filling it with something less impactful, more mundane bullshit.
Some things are worth putting the time into. Complaining about how long it is doesn't change the fact that it's WORTH NINETY FUCKING MINUTES OF YOUR LIFE!
Megaman_EXE
in reply to P03 Locke • • •James R Kirk
in reply to Powderhorn • • •like this
Triumph, andyburke, DaGeek247, Badabinski, Lasslinthar, HarkMahlberg, SuiXi3D and TVA like this.
UntouchedWagons
in reply to James R Kirk • • •like this
TVA likes this.
HarkMahlberg
in reply to UntouchedWagons • • •like this
TVA and yessikg like this.
UntouchedWagons
in reply to HarkMahlberg • • •like this
HarkMahlberg and TVA like this.
HarkMahlberg
in reply to UntouchedWagons • • •like this
TVA likes this.
UntouchedWagons
in reply to Powderhorn • • •like this
HarkMahlberg and TVA like this.
Powderhorn
in reply to UntouchedWagons • • •like this
HarkMahlberg and TVA like this.
turdburglar
in reply to Powderhorn • • •mutherfuken 🔥
well done, alec.
like this
TVA likes this.
ɔiƚoxɘup
in reply to Powderhorn • • •like this
TVA likes this.