Skip to main content


Google Just Patented The End Of Your Website


https://www.forbes.com/sites/joetoscano1/2026/03/06/google-just-patented-the-end-of-your-website/

in reply to Powderhorn

I haven't hated any idea more than I hate this in a little while
in reply to Brave Little Hitachi Wand

This comnent sums up the internet pretty god damn well.

I'mma steal it. Thanx.

And thanx for good laughs too.

in reply to Brave Little Hitachi Wand

Drink verification can. (I know this is a joke, but someone somewhere will probably try to make it not a joke)

But this is a pretty damn close second.

in reply to Powderhorn

I think it's pretty obvious at this point that a lot of the backdrop for the AI arms race is a competition to see who can succeed in paywalling the internet as a whole.

Machine learning is more in the nature of a side business. The primary goal of scraping the entire internet is to then strangle the original sites by denying them traffic, so that the data the corporations have stored away in their centers is all that's left, and anyone who wants to access it will have to pay them.

It's essentially rent-seeking on the largest and thus most brazenly evil, scale the world has seen yet.

And made just that much more evil by the fact that it's all based on content that they've stolen from us in the first place.

in reply to WatDabney

in reply to Powderhorn

On the plus side, this kills the SEO market.


IMO this doesn't kill the SEO market, it just brings it in-house, just like Google has tried to do with all kinds of other things. If you've ever seen the little dropdown question options in Google's search results page that give you the answer right from the website without you having to visit it, you know what I'm talking about.

Just like the dropdowns, which simply take the website and use it as a way for Google to show you the answer rather than the site itself, this doesn't kill the market for SEO, it just allows Google to decide how to "optimize" the results from their search engine to you, rather than the site itself, and earn more of a profit from it as a result.

in reply to Powderhorn

replaces it with an AI-generated version assembled on the fly. The user never sees what your team built


Oh good, DLSS 5 for websites. Just what we needed.

in reply to HarkMahlberg

At least it's slower and burns through more water.
in reply to Powderhorn

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Powderhorn

Sounds like Google decided to take dead internet theory into their own hands.
in reply to TehPers

Well, someone, uh ... had to change the theory into reality.
in reply to Powderhorn

more concrete reasons for telling people why they shouldnt use google search
in reply to Powderhorn

Can't wait for the calls from outraged customers demanding that I honor the AI-hallucinated offers they found on my website. (The AI decided that customers were more likely to stay on my webpage if my prices were 80% lower.)
in reply to Powderhorn

We just need a new browser that uses different dns and we can start our own web. 😇
in reply to Powderhorn

Degoogle, my people, degoogle...

Don't try it all at once. Do it in steps, starting with simple things, like a different search engine, using local docs or foss cloud service, replacing google apps, trying a different email service,etc

Don't overthink it. There's nothing perfect. Just try any alternative and stick to it if you like it. But overcome the inertia, try something. The less users they have, the less powerful they will be. And don't fall for the trap of thinking that it doesn't matter or doesn't make a difference, because that's what benefits them in the end. Remember, the most important thing is to overcome the inertia.

in reply to Powderhorn

So in other words, w patent that will "allow' google to steal your website's content so that they can make even more moneys from it.

Sounds like a typical Google day to me

in reply to Powderhorn

while this sounds awful. there is little correlation between patents and actual features. companies patent whatever they can. it mean little if it is a good idea or not. they just want the largest possible patent portfolio.
in reply to Powderhorn

The reasons they want to do this sound horrible, and I wouldn't want to use any such thing Google puts out, but I was thinking the other day about how something like this might be useful for enhancing privacy by preventing websites fingerprinting you. Think something like an Invidious server, except for any arbitrary website instead of only youtube; you can indirectly interact with javascript features, maximize the browser to fill your whole monitor revealing its resolution, but the end server will never know you are doing this stuff because all they see is the way your middleman server is configured (which will be as generic as possible).
in reply to Powderhorn

Afaik even Tor can be vulnerable to some kinds of fingerprinting, if javascript is turned on, which is required to use some websites, I'm thinking of this as something that could be used in conjunction with Tor
in reply to chicken

You'd be surprised how few websites actually require third-party JS. I've been using NoScript for years, and I'll allow the first-party JS to read something, but the other 15 domains can go fuck themselves if I can't read the article without totally opening up my computer to trackers.
in reply to Powderhorn

I don't like the thought of first-party javascript being able to fingerprint me either though
in reply to Powderhorn

That doesn't read/seem very novel. Seems like a pretty obvious iteration or implementation if you wanted to implement something like that.
in reply to Kissaki

That's the whole point of patents! If it's obvious and you get to it first, and you can lawyer up, you can prevent others from doing the obvious.