Meta has returned to court in the US this week for the second phase of a lawsuit brought by Raúl Torrez, New Mexico’s attorney general, following a March verdict that found the company liable for child safety failures and imposed a $375m fine. On Monday, the state petitioned for a legal sanction against the company, a monetary penalty 10 times the original amount, and a sweeping, drastic overhaul of Meta’s child safety protocols.In the second part of the landmark case, known as the remedies phase, the state is asking for Meta to be declared a public nuisance and for the judge to order the company to pay $3.7bn in an abatement plan. The money would fund programs for law enforcement, mental health services and educators. The state is also requesting that the judge force a series of design changes to Meta’s platforms aimed at improving child safety, including universal age verification, de-encryption of children’s messages, a guardian account linked to every child’s account, and a child safety monitor tasked with holding Meta to accoun
... Show more...Meta has returned to court in the US this week for the second phase of a lawsuit brought by Raúl Torrez, New Mexico’s attorney general, following a March verdict that found the company liable for child safety failures and imposed a $375m fine. On Monday, the state petitioned for a legal sanction against the company, a monetary penalty 10 times the original amount, and a sweeping, drastic overhaul of Meta’s child safety protocols.In the second part of the landmark case, known as the remedies phase, the state is asking for Meta to be declared a public nuisance and for the judge to order the company to pay $3.7bn in an abatement plan. The money would fund programs for law enforcement, mental health services and educators. The state is also requesting that the judge force a series of design changes to Meta’s platforms aimed at improving child safety, including universal age verification, de-encryption of children’s messages, a guardian account linked to every child’s account, and a child safety monitor tasked with holding Meta to account for five years.
The New Mexico department of justice argues that these changes would make Meta’s social networks safer for underage users in the state. Meta, however, says the proposed reforms are unfeasible and could ultimately force it to shutdown its platforms in the state altogether.
New Mexico is not exactly a heavyweight, but it will be interesting to see how this plays out.
State’s attorney general petitions for overhaul of how Meta’s child safety protocol in second phase of landmark case
Katie McQue (The Guardian)
outandinburger
in reply to Powderhorn • • •Which will never succeed.
And if it does it does, they’ll never change.
And when they don’t change, no one will enforce it.
And they’ll never pay the fine.
IDew
in reply to Powderhorn • • •Hit them where it hurts the most!
like this
yessikg likes this.
themurphy
in reply to IDew • • •They'll never do that.
The data harvesting is worth more to them.
ikidd
in reply to Powderhorn • • •This is all the things and more that people here were loosing their shit over because there was a PR in systemd for adding a birthdate field.
Hirom
in reply to Powderhorn • • •They're requesting mostly wrong solutions for real problems.
Age verification doesn't address social media's problems, but does increase data collection and decrease privacy.
Same for decrypting private messages.
A guardian account does seem reasonable.
They could also completely turn off user seach for minors, so they would have to add contacts by username or email, and couldn't reach or be reached easily by online strangers.
Minors could circumvent this if there's no age verification. But today's age verification methods are neither privacy-friendly nor hard to circumvent. Until they are, it's not worth requiring age verification.