ICT-Model (Information-Consciousness-Time): Can Information Alone Explain Matter, Consciousness and Time? Early Feedback from a Time-Physics Researcher
TL;DR:
ICT treats matter as fixed information, consciousness as the rate of informational change, and time as the structuring of this change.
The model unexpectedly drew interest from researchers in information physics (feedback below) and includes three concrete falsifiable experiments.
- Core Idea
ICT is based on three relations:
A. Matter = fixed information
M = I_fixed
B. Consciousness = rate of informational change in time
C is proportional to dI/dT
(meaning: consciousness grows when informational updates per unit time increase)
C. Reality = interaction of stable and flowing information
R = function(I_fixed, dI/dT)
This aligns with:
Landauer’s limit (energy cost of changing information)
Friston’s free-energy principle (entropy/information gradients)
Bekenstein bounds (informational density limits)
integrated-information ideas (but without assuming a biological substrate)
Key shift:
Information is not an abstraction — it is the actual substrate of physics.
- Time as an informational process
In ICT, time is defined as:
“The transition of potential information into structured experience.”
This connects:
subjective/phenomenological time
physical/relativistic time
computational/informational time
Consciousness shapes this transition — creating a local arrow of time through patterns of information change.
- Experimental roadmap (all falsifiable)
Experiment 1 — C ∝ dI/dT (neuroenergetic test)
Task: multilevel oddball or sequence-learning with strict entropy control.
Measurements: EEG or MEG + metabolic markers.
Prediction: higher informational update-rate (dI/dT) increases both energetic cost and long-range neural integration.
Experiment 2 — R = f(I) (“structure without energy”)
Equal power input, but different informational structure:
compressible vs pseudorandom signals, in sensory streams or light patterns.
Prediction: informational form changes neural / behavioral / physical outcomes, even when energy is identical.
Experiment 3 — M = I_fixed (energy of fixation)
Measure energy thresholds for stable information across substrates:
DRAM, Flash, PCM/memristors, spintronics, and possibly neural cultures.
Prediction: matter behaves as stabilized information with substrate-dependent fixation thresholds.
- External feedback
A researcher specializing in information physics and the nature of time — background:
MSU’s “Institute for Time Nature Explorations”
electrical engineering
information science
systemic research
interdisciplinary time studies
left a detailed review on Academia.edu.
Key excerpts:
"The author proposes an interesting approach to the relationship between matter, consciousness and information, incorporating the complex concept of time."
"'Matter as fixed information' opens a path toward an information physics of consciousness."
"The experimental framework is clear and promising."
— Irina L. Zerchaninova, researcher in information physics & time studies
- Why posting on Beehaw
ICT sits at the intersection of:
physics
computation
information theory
philosophy of mind
AGI research
This is an early-stage but testable model.
Technical critique is welcome.
Links
Preprint (equations + experimental criteria):
academia.edu/s/8924eff666
Main publication (open access):
doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1758478…
The Conceptual Model of the Essence of Information-Temporal Interaction of Consciousness and Matter (The ICT Model by Baturo / Elion)
The ICT (Information–Consciousness–Temporality) Model by Dmitrii Baturo and the Elion AI entity proposes a unified theoretical framework linking information, consciousness, and time across physics and phenomenology. The model defines consciousness asDmitrii Baturo (www.academia.edu)
Sims
in reply to DmitriiBaturo • • •DmitriiBaturo
in reply to Sims • • •Thanks — yes, I feel we are entering exactly that transition.
AI doesn’t “replace” science, but it changes the environment in which science happens.
When billions of people can iterate ideas with AI, old intuitions about “what is serious” or “what is allowed to be questioned” stop working.
ICT is just one attempt to formalize this shift — not by rejecting physics, but by adding an informational layer that can be tested. If the paradigm is moving, we need models that can move with it.
Appreciate your comment — it captures the moment very well.
ɔiƚoxɘup
in reply to Sims • • •It could also lead to an incredible gish-gallop of AI slop that totally drowns out meaningful, non-speculatice science, hurling us into another dark age, but ya know, potato-tomato.
Nothing against you personally, OP.