I feel the fact that #Bluesky is connected to Steve Bannon and Russian state media and cryptobros should be bigger news.
But it's not.
If you search "Bluesky" using a search engine like DuckDuckGo, you'll come across results like "Here's What To Know About Bluesky" (NBC) or "X users jump to Bluesky - but what is it and who owns it" (BBC). One would think the aforementioned connections would be relevant info in a piece like that.
The omission is glaring.
reshared this
Justin Ferriman
in reply to David Brent 📚 • • •Nazo
in reply to Justin Ferriman • • •@justinf Reread the post you replied to.
It's literally just as bad. Yes, even as bad as Musk is. (Ok, it takes several bad things to equal him, but the point is, it's actually that bad.)
Arlen Moller
in reply to David Brent 📚 • • •QOTCA 💛
in reply to Arlen Moller • • •Check @ Dave Troy
Nicole Parsons
in reply to David Brent 📚 • • •Google the word "billionaires" under "news".
How many results are reports shilling stock, crypto, or a hedge fund?
How many results are about the enormous damage they're causing to democracy, the environment, and society?
If folks wanted news about toxic positivity they'd join a cult, not subscribe to a mainstream news source.
I get the same 12 results each time listed first.