Skip to main content


How far did astronomers travel world-wide for conferences in 2019 in total? More than 300 times to the Moon & back! Or, to put it in astronomical units: more than 1.5 AU, so to the Sun and halfway back!

▶️ https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae143

A 🧵 summarizing our paper "Astronomy’s climate emissions: Global travel to scientific meetings in 2019" - published today, lead by Andrea Gokus (who also wrote the draft for this thread) and @knud, with many people, among them @leo & me, contributing:

1/6

#astrodon

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Dr. Victoria Grinberg

Astronomy is a very international & collaborative field, but as can be seen from the map, the majority of meetings tend to take place in Europe & North America.

Meetings in remote places cause more flights ➡️ more emissions. We estimate is at least 42,500 tCO2e in total in 2019.

2/6

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Dr. Victoria Grinberg

Not a big surprise, but the higher the amount of local (less than 100 km from venue) participants, the smaller the average emissions.

Most astronomy meetings are small, with less than 100 attendees. But depending on the meeting venue, average emissions can be very high if most people have to fly medium to long distance. For large meetings, average emissions scatter around the average value of 1t CO2e per person.

3/6

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Dr. Victoria Grinberg

Who gets to travel to these in-person meetings? Proportionally more researchers from wealthier countries with a higher Human Development Index, and those also seem to travel to more meetings in general.

But more importantly, who does not get to travel much, or at all? ➡️ Scientists at less wealthy institutes or in less wealthy countries; scientists having to deal with lengthy/complicated visa processes; scientists with care-taking responsibilities; and scientists with disabilities.

4/6

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)