Get Ready Now: Republicans Will Refuse to Certify a Harris Win
I am reminded of an old Al Franken slogan, "If it's not close, they can't steal it."
Get out there and vote.
https://www.thebulwark.com/p/republicans-will-refuse-certify-harris-election
#HarrisWalz #Harris #Harris2024 #KamalaHarris2024
Get Ready Now: Republicans Will Refuse to Certify a Harris Win
Trumpist county election officials are preparing to throw the process into chaos.A.B. Stoddard (The Bulwark)
MugsysRapSheet 🔩🐑🐘
in reply to Sue Stone • • •Nazo
in reply to MugsysRapSheet 🔩🐑🐘 • • •MugsysRapSheet 🔩🐑🐘
in reply to Nazo • • •@nazokiyoubinbou
We don't have to go as far as "assassination".
Simply refusing to hold an inauguration until an investigation into #ElectionFraud was completed would be more than sufficient.
#Trivia: The date of the inauguration isn't in the #Constitution. It was set to Jan 20th by #FDR because the actual transition date was too arbitrary (after he was elected in '32 in the middle of #TheGreatDepression, people had to wait until April before Hoover was finally out of office.)
Nazo
in reply to MugsysRapSheet 🔩🐑🐘 • • •@MugsysRapSheet Good point, but all I was saying is Biden is the sort who will pretty much follow the "right thing" even if the Supreme Court has essentially declared he is the emperor of the country above all law.
Though, I just realized this is even stranger still when you consider that apparently just being a former president is enough to receive this immunity. So that immunity to law (according to the Supreme Court) applies to all living former presidents...
MugsysRapSheet 🔩🐑🐘
in reply to Nazo • • •It only applies to acts committed WHILE in office, and if challenged, the #SCotUS must still rule whether the act was part of their "official" duties. (THIS court would defer to T****, but rule against #Biden for the same crime.)
volkris
in reply to MugsysRapSheet 🔩🐑🐘 • • •@MugsysRapSheet The Supreme Court already ruled against Trump, though, sending the case back for prosecution.
So yeah it’s not acts committed while in office. It’s official, legal acts that cannot be prosecuted. Yeah, the Supreme Court said you can’t be prosecuted for legal things. It’s really not that crazy ruling as so many misleading writings have been trying to spread.
So this court has already refused to defer to Trump and has cleared the way for prosecuting him. It’s right there in the ruling.
Again, it wasn’t a crazy ruling, it basically just said a president can’t harass somebody with the justice department.
@nazokiyoubinbou @knittingknots2