🚨 They are bringing back #ChatControl 🚨
Hummelgaard doesn't understand that no means no.
Discussion is scheduled for tomorrow, so act now: fightchatcontrol.eu/
#No2Backdoors #Privacy #Security
Source: noyb.eu/en/eu-commission-about…
netzpolitik.org/2025/interne-d…
Interne Dokumente: EU-Staaten wollen Chatkontrolle-Gesetz ohne weitere Änderungen
Die EU-Staaten wollen Internet-Diensten dauerhaft eine freiwillige Chatkontrolle erlauben. Viele Staaten bedauern, dass es keine ausreichende Mehrheit für eine verpflichtende Chatkontrolle gibt. Weitere Änderungen lehnen sie strikt ab.netzpolitik.org
This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
reshared this
Milk🥛
in reply to Tuta • • •ℂ𝕖𝕝𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕖@39C3: /#
in reply to Tuta • • •Maybe then he understands what his totally erroneous ideas actually mean 🤮
Mrtn 🐧🐺🧅
in reply to Tuta • • •Kevin Russell
in reply to Tuta • • •We must break with the idea there is "A room in which the police are not watching"
Every room, all day.
1984
nictakiego
in reply to Tuta • • •Blender Dumbass ( J.Y.Amihud )
in reply to Tuta • • •DigitalDigger
in reply to Tuta • • •LΞX/NØVΛ 🇪🇺
in reply to Tuta • • •Bad News Nobody
in reply to Tuta • • •Lala
in reply to Tuta • • •Draken BlackKnight
in reply to Tuta • • •Little Art Histories
in reply to Tuta • • •You want to open my private mail too? Are we all criminals now that have to be controlled? Oh, we think the wrong things now, right?
WTF is wrong with those politicians - who are probably deep in some tech-bros pockets anyways?
I bet they are lamenting about their privacy as soon as their private space is breached.
Marcus Rohrmoser 🌻
in reply to Tuta • • •im Übrigen bin ich der Meinung, daß die #wehrhafteDemokratie bei Angriffen auf Grundrechte durch Amt- und Mandatsträgers 3-Strikes anwenden sollte.
Marcus Rohrmoser 🌻
in reply to Tuta • • •we must break with the totally desastrous practice that is is every public officials liberty to repeatedly break fundamental civil rights. 3-strikes now!
Kerplunk
in reply to Tuta • • •Hummegaard is a right wing piece of pure stubbon unpleasantness.
He really needs kicking out of EU discussions Permanently.
PRIVACY IS A RIGHT
Faschism and total surveillance is not....
Synnef
in reply to Tuta • • •Wanna see me attempt to break privacy laws?
Wanna see me do it again?
Daniel Detlaf, Meatpuppet
in reply to Tuta • • •vepř jako pepř
in reply to Tuta • • •Branwen74
in reply to Tuta • • •🇪🇺🇩🇪Machina
in reply to Tuta • • •Something that doesn't get much attention here is the age verification requirement they have slid into the text.
There is no specification as to how it must be conducted, but we can quickly grasp that they are going to suggest something like a “scan your face” and eventually it will be the common age verificatiom proposal they are working on. The weakening GDPR, makes people increasingly concerned here...
Tuta
in reply to 🇪🇺🇩🇪Machina • • •crazyeddie
in reply to Tuta • • •"The United States needs to get past its fear of dictators."
The Cancer is everywhere.
Eggs now in different baskets.
in reply to Tuta • • •A simple solution.
Ask Herre Hummelgaard to publish in a public internet space:
a) every chat message that he has sent and received,
b) every email he has sent and received
c) every SMS/MMS that has crossed his phone.
d) every post on any form of social media he has made
That is basically what he wants to do to all of us with Chat Control.
"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him."
Cardinal Richelieu
Kristian 🐟
in reply to Tuta • • •Do you want to introduce chat control?
( ) Yes
( ) Ask me again in three months
Count Holdem
in reply to Tuta • • •Don't worry. When we're all gone and AI is fighting for us against the #broligarchy, in their luxury bunkers; we'll have one last victory.
Hurrah!
#GenZ #uprising
voidhoudini
in reply to Tuta • • •Freya
in reply to Tuta • • •Fight Chat Control - Protect Digital Privacy in the EU
fightchatcontrol.euTuta
in reply to Freya • • •David Penfold
in reply to Tuta • • •iguana09863
in reply to Tuta • • •iguana09863
in reply to Tuta • • •LittleFrank
in reply to Tuta • • •Dźwiedziu
in reply to Tuta • • •> Hummelgaard doesn't understand that no means no.
He exibits rapist mentality.
David
in reply to Tuta • • •People will be very happy with unencrypted communications if every politician, judge, policeman and soldierb is a 100% transparent with his private life, sexual orientation and relations, his earnings, how many businesses they possess or invest into. And that will be mandatory for all of them in the EU.
And they will be arrested, processed and condemned the same day if a single "suspicion" of illegal activities is spotted. 😈
Woodstock
in reply to Tuta • • •maybe you didn't notice but as communicated in the noyb article, we've got bigger problems than chatcontrol now. Don't get me wrong, chatcontrol would have (and may still) be a crappy and dangerous law, but If we had to, I'm confident we could come up with technical solutions and workflows ways around the letter of the chatcontrol law. On the other hand, the GDPR clawbacks meant to provide the unregulated access to EU user data to USA companies is something that there is no recovering from or finding clever work arounds for. This truly represents the first and most important domino, that if allowed to fall, would trigger the rapid and inevitable Ameri-shitification of Europe. Can we please put some effort into lobbying against this as well?
noyb.eu/en/eu-commission-about…
EU Commission about to wreck core principles of the GDPR
noyb.euLittle Rao
in reply to Tuta • • •Sensitive content
okay sir, then please be a role model and publish all your private communications!
Or do you need hackers to do that for you???
un teclado
in reply to Tuta • • •un teclado
in reply to Tuta • • •a1
in reply to Tuta • • •redbr1ck
in reply to Tuta • • •Cart
in reply to Tuta • • •Toni Aittoniemi
in reply to Tuta • • •chuckfinley
in reply to Tuta • • •filobus
in reply to Tuta • • •Brian
in reply to Tuta • • •Niels Moseley
in reply to Tuta • • •Bogdan Buduroiu
in reply to Tuta • • •Failing at pushing for #ChatControl once should’ve been the end of this guy’s career.
Trying a second time should incur a jail sentence
Ed Davies
in reply to Tuta • • •