Skip to main content


“People looking for alternative social media apps should be cautious about the privacy implications of sharing information with an app that has not yet seen substantial public scrutiny outside of China,” EFF’s @cooperq told @verge. theverge.com/2025/1/16/2434524…
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation

My first thought was to reply with "It can't be any worse than Facebook." After checking the article, I see that this was in fact addressed.
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation

that's the point? it wasn't as if people went to rednote to get more security or to have more freedom of expression, it was a middle finger as in "oh, you don't want the Chinese to have my data?" the fact that people don't get that baffles me
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation

I doubt that the people going to Redbook are concerned about the "public scrutiny" of the app. I suspect they only want their bread and circus.
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation

Many people are suggesting that it's impossible to protect privacy, so it doesn't matter which app you use.

Others are trying Rednote because they are, reasonably, tired of tech oligarchies.

Both are understandable reactions to the surveillance capitalism ecosystem. But there's more we can do. 🧵

in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation

There are steps you can take, and steps that we believe legislators should take, to protect our privacy in the future. Things CAN be better. eff.org/deeplinks/2024/02/priv…
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation

Rednote shares data with Facebook and Google ad networks, so using it doesn’t protect your data from US-based companies. It also has more pervasive censorship than similar apps. What we really need isn’t a new app—it’s a federal privacy law. eff.org/wp/privacy-first-bette…
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation

Some states have passed strong privacy laws, but so far, we do not have a federal law. In our view, the discussion of how banning TikTok fails to protect privacy has made it more likely that we can reach a privacy law, because legislators are waking up to the reality of the surveillance ecosystem. eff.org/deeplinks/2024/12/eff-…
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation

Individuals must tell their legislators to pass a comprehensive privacy law. But there are also actions YOU can take right now to protect yourself from data surveillance by U.S. and foreign companies and governments. Visit our Surveillance Self-Defense Guide to learn more. ssd.eff.org
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation

Lastly, it can be easy to assume that there is no way to protect privacy, and that surveillance gets worse every year. Don’t give up hope — there are many reasons to be optimistic. Here are just a few: eff.org/deeplinks/2024/02/priv…
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation

Can you explain how government-run surveillance ecosystems are an "understandable" alternative to capitalist ones, especially for non-residents of that government's country? I'm having a very hard time understanding how anyone could come to the conclusion that Rednote's surveillance is "better" than Facebook et al's.

And to be crystal clear - in my opinion both are *terrible* in an absolute sense but foreign government-run surveillance is worse.

in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation

here's a post I just did on my freshly minted blog that is related. I plan on sharing this in my FB account this week as I enact my plans to delete it and try and convince others to do so.

blog.tjhome.dev/suck-it-zuck/

in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation

Okay, we're talking about people who were still using TikTok, but consciously choosing ANOTHER chinese app is really...indescribable.