DHS bought a dog-like robot that it modified with an antenna array to let law enforcement overload people’s home networks to disable any “internet of things” devices, according a transcript obtained by EFF’s Dave Maass and shared with @404mediaco. https://www.404media.co/dhs-has-a-ddos-robot-to-disable-internet-of-things-booby-traps-inside-homes/![DHS Has a DoS Robot to Disable Internet of Things ‘Booby Traps’ Inside Homes](https://friendica.hellquist.eu/photo/preview/640/3033118)
DHS Has a DoS Robot to Disable Internet of Things ‘Booby Traps’ Inside Homes
"NEO carries an onboard computer and antenna array that will allow officers the ability to create a ‘denial-of-service’ event to disable ‘Internet of Things’ devices that could potentially cause harm while entry is made."Jason Koebler (404 Media)
reshared this
Camerondotca
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •Matthew Cowen
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •freediverx
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •Log 🪵
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •Johanness A. Nilsson
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •Tim Ward ⭐🇪🇺🔶 #FBPE
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •echo
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •Dan Herbert
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •MoiraEve
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •DanDan420
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •Danielle Crawford
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •SloanLA
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •Jo Jitsu
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •SomeGadgetGuy
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •🚲
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •noodle
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •noodle
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •Stork
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •MegatronicThronBanks
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •Shark Attak
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •This is probably an excuse to either blow some taxpayers' money, or ramp up electronic surveillance.
Bill Zaumen
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •Chris from Earth
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •Nazo
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •This sounds dangerously close to being illegal to me.
Though really DHS itself should be straight up illegal.
cultdev
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •acm
in reply to Electronic Frontier Foundation • • •