2024-09-25 07:33:11
2024-09-19 13:14:40
2024-09-19 13:13:51
9689384
Patrick Breyer: Leak on latest #ChatControl attempt [...] - no blocking minority! [...] Only 5 days to next discussion
Leak on latest #ChatControl attempt (in German): https://netzpolitik.org/2024/interne-dokumente-sperrminoritaet-gegen-chatkontrolle-wackelt/ +++ Only AUT, DEU, EST, LUX, POL, SVN were critical – no blocking minority! +++ BEL, CZE, FIN, ITA, NLD, PRT, SWE undecided +++ EU legal experts confirm violation of our fundamental rights +++ Only 5 days to next discussion +++
Help pressure our governments into defending our #privacy of correspondence and secure #encryption now: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/take-action-to-stop-chat-control-now/
🇬🇧Leak on latest #ChatControl attempt (in German): https://netzpolitik.org/2024/interne-dokumente-sperrminoritaet-gegen-chatkontrolle-wackelt/ +++ Only AUT, DEU, EST, LUX, POL, SVN were critical – no blocking minority! +++ BEL, CZE, FIN, ITA, NLD, PRT, SWE undecided +++ EU legal experts confirm violation of our fundamental rights +++ Only 5 days to next discussion +++Help pressure our governments into defending our #privacy of correspondence and secure #encryption now: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/take-action-to-stop-chat-control-now/
Interne Dokumente: Sperrminorität gegen Chatkontrolle wackelt
Einige EU-Staaten wollen die verpflichtende Chatkontrolle erstmal auf bekannte Inhalte beschränken, damit das Gesetz endlich kommt. Andere Staaten lehnen es weiterhin ab, Inhalte Unverdächtiger zu kontrollieren und Verschlüsselung zu umgehen.netzpolitik.org
acockworkorange
in reply to noodlejetski • • •piyuv
in reply to acockworkorange • • •acockworkorange
in reply to piyuv • • •piyuv
in reply to acockworkorange • • •https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/take-action-to-stop-chat-control-now/
It works well for me. But let me paste it here anyway:
... Show more...https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/take-action-to-stop-chat-control-now/
It works well for me. But let me paste it here anyway:
„Chatkontrolle“ bei WhatsApp und Co: Gesetzesvorhaben geht in nächste Runde
Thomas Gutschker (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung)acockworkorange
in reply to piyuv • • •Lime Buzz (fae/she)
in reply to acockworkorange • • •Chat Control: The EU's CSEM scanner proposal
Patrick Breyeracockworkorange
in reply to Lime Buzz (fae/she) • • •Lime Buzz (fae/she)
in reply to acockworkorange • • •acockworkorange
in reply to Lime Buzz (fae/she) • • •A-ha! So there’s a bit of both client issues and user error. My client crops the preview image of the site. And when I clicked the link to the mastodon post, I didn’t pay attention to the image because I had already seen it in the client.
Still, this being a general privacy group, it would be good if OP didn’t assume the reader was familiar with current EU politics. A small paragraph would be enough to contextualize the post.
piyuv
in reply to noodlejetski • • •This seems more and more like an uphill battle. It’s proposed, somehow rejected, and comes back again after 6 months. Rinse and repeat until it’s accepted.
I’m not European so I don’t have a vote in this, but it’s pretty concerning
like this
ignirtoq likes this.
MonkderVierte
in reply to piyuv • • •approach to achieving major goals by consistently taking small steps
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)memphis
in reply to noodlejetski • • •Translation of parts from the German netzpolitik.org article:
... Show more...Translation of parts from the German netzpolitik.org article:
Other states also reject the current proposal. Six states "stated that they could not agree to the proposal due to fundamental concerns.
[...]
The Legal Service of the EU member states supports the critics. Last year, the experts came to the conclusion that chat control is contrary to fundamental rights and will fail in court. These concerns have "still not been dispelled". The lawyers also believe "that the proposal would not stand up to judicial review" - i.e. it is illegal.
[...]
If either France or Italy - or two states from the Netherlands, Belgium and the Czech Republic - reject the new proposal, there will still be no majority in the Council.
[...]
The Hungarian Council Presidency is sticking to its optimistic timetable. Hungary actually wanted to "further negotiate the proposal at a technical level". That would be the Council working group on criminal prosecution. It met today, but did not discuss the chat control.
Instead, the advisors for justice and home affairs are to negotiate the Hungarian proposal on Monday. If Hungary has its way, the Permanent Representatives will then decide on the Council's position, followed by the Justice and Home Affairs Ministers on October 10. France and Sweden are "explicitly" in favor.