3 weeks ago • •
that precisely misunderstands the argument.
The argument is that the executive branch does exactly what the president wants within bounds of law. The argument is that those things are legal. However, they except limits on presidential authority to spend money that hasn't been appropriated.
volkris
in reply to The Tennessee Holler • • •that precisely misunderstands the argument.
The argument is that the executive branch does exactly what the president wants within bounds of law. The argument is that those things are legal. However, they except limits on presidential authority to spend money that hasn't been appropriated.