"The Mozilla community envisions a world where we protect our privacy online, we control our personal data, and we use AI that is trustworthy."
No, you do not prioritize those goals. You have chosen instead to prioritize "ethical" surveillance capitalism, an oxymoron reflective of your institution's decision to prioritize continued surveillance capitalism funding at the expense of those purported goals.
blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/im…
So long as you continue down that path, I have absolutely no interest in providing any resources to assist you.
Improving online advertising through product and infrastructure
Mozilla is developing privacy-focused digital advertising solutions, aiming to reshape the industry while respecting users' rights.Laura Chambers (The Mozilla Blog)
yoasif
in reply to Preston Maness ☭ • • •You may enjoy my take on this: quippd.com/writing/2024/10/13/…
> Unfortunately, after studying each proposal, I predict they will inadvertently lend themselves to further incentivize the publication and spread of low-quality information (including misinformation), polluting the information landscape and threatening democracies worldwide.
Protecting Your Privacy While Eroding Your Democracy: Apple’s and Mozilla’s PPAs (Privacy Preserving Ad Attribution) Considered Harmful
Asif YoussuffPreston Maness ☭
in reply to yoasif • • •@yoasif Thanks! It was a good read 👍 My main takeaway from it is that online advertising itself is largely unfit for consumption; whether it tramples on individuals or communities, it tramples all the same. If the consequence of a rejection of online advertising is a smaller world wide web powered by circulation/subscription revenue rather than ad revenue, then I say so be it.
It also reminded me of @aral's "Free is a Lie" lecture/presentation/talk:
ar.al/talks/
Talks
Aral Balkan