Skip to main content


WhatsApp "interoperability"


Apparently Europe finally got Whatsapp to enable 3rd party chats making it easier to switch to more privacy friendly alternatives article
However the only other app that currently works with it is "BirdyChat"??

Have anybody found any news about when serious alternatives will be integrated?

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Kami

Ok sorry, it was in the article:

birdy.chat/

And also this:

haiket.com/

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Kami

It seems like a work chat app

birdy.chat/

in reply to PrivateNoob

It's definitely something I'll use, since work chat is all I do on WhatsApp currently.

I only need to be sure it isn't some scam, although the alternative is Meta, so... yeah...

in reply to mattreb

I'm already using a matrix bridge for it because I can't get some cousins to move natively to Matrix. But if that would make it more stable it would be appreciated.
in reply to Jeena

I can ditch what's app and use matrix with what's app 😅👀???
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to DSN9

!beeper@lemmy.ml
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to DSN9

if it works the same as a bridge, message is relayed unencrypted
Unknown parent

lemmy - Link to source
themurphy
apperently meta gets to pick it, and it is not a public api.


No they dont, and it's a public modified Matrix-protocol. Why would you lie about that?

The problem is that WhatsApp can demand third parties to meet very high standards, making it impossible for independent actors to gain access to this.

You need a pretty well run machinery to live up to the standard, but if they do, WhatApps can legally not deny access.

If they do, it's in violation of the DMA, which gives you a 10% of all global income in fees.

These has been used against Meta and Google before, and there's no reason to believe they wont do it again. They actually live up to it.

in reply to mattreb

As your are talking about privacy friendly alternatives, the answer is none, because they would immediately lose their privacy friendlyness
in reply to themurphy

WhatsApp was originally built on, and still is, a forked version of XMPP. It is nothing like the matrix protocol.
Unknown parent

lemmy - Link to source
bartleby1
You’re correct, it is not a public API. In fact, just to see the specs, you need to be either an organization (or an indie developer) registered in the EU and have to sign a massive NDA just to get the documentation!
Unknown parent

lemmy - Link to source
themurphy

Signal wont do it because they cant use their own protocol. You still have to use WhatsApps, which makes it flawed.

I also hope for good clients, but maybe the rules will change further before there's any real use case for it. Maybe it's too expensive compared to making your own?

in reply to bartleby1

It's not, but they made a WhatsApp API for the DMA. There's a Matrix bridge to WhatsApp.
in reply to onlinepersona

developers.facebook.com/messag…

Again, I dont think you can access it unless you follow the rules.

I guess it's not true public, but you can if you meet the requirements.

in reply to mattreb

Have anybody found any news about when serious alternatives will be integrated?


...never? They're not integrated because they don't want them integrated. This is malicious compliance. Even if they were, the opt-in nature would make it completely useless. Much like Apple's RCS integration.

in reply to artyom

yeah this is pretty much what I was thinking, but I made the post just because I was really hoping this was not the case...
in reply to mattreb

The Birdy app requires a work email, which then gets you on a wait list, so that you can subject yourself to their data mining:

Data Categories:

  • The email address you use as username on BirdyChat network;
  • Your messages and media within messages;
  • User identifiers for blocked WhatsApp users;
  • Usage information including timestamps related to your communication with WhatsApp users;
  • Device and connection information such as IP address, operating system information and the BirdyChat version you are using;
  • General location information using your IP address;
  • Authentication information including encryption keys that WhatsApp encryption protocol uses;
  • WhatsApp user reports in case a WhatsApp user chooses to share this information with WhatsApp.
in reply to mattreb

I'm going to setup my own open source chat server soon and just give the few people that need to talk to me a copy of the open source client. That you can use to talk to me, the rest will be gone

I'm sooooo fucking tired of every company and government wanting to inspect my asshole just so they know that toilet paper to advertise to me or to be sure that I'm "not a terrorist or a pedophile because the government totally is doing this to protect the children, absolutely!!!"

Fuck your lies

Fuck your marketing

And apologies for my French, I'm just reeeeeeaaaally done with this nonsense

in reply to themurphy

I understand the DMA interop thing quite well, and it is a private API. The matrix bridge does not use official interop as the Matrix foundation has given up on plans to do interop, as it requires geolocating (and then georestricting) their users.

The current, longstanding, matrix bridge requires you to have the WhatsApp app installed on your phone, with a working account.

in reply to bartleby1

From my understanding, this bridge does use some the official WhatsApp web client's API. You only need to connect the official app once in a while (a few seconds every two weeks) and can do so on a separate device.
This entry was edited (2 days ago)