OC, being propagandized local fools, they had to include unverified vilification of Russia and China + a focus on other societies than our own. Only a few very low figures from US/UK etc, despite: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveill…
Jeebus, US/Western propaganda/mindset is thin and embarrassing !
I don't know about Russia but China is a very strong surveillance state. The US is also pretty bad and currently getting worse so don't go on a BUT THE US!!!!! rant trying to defend China with whataboutism.
CCTV isn't a problem. It's mass surveillance. As the saying goes, "show me the man and I'll show you the crime". With enough information the state can always find something to turn their political enemy into a criminal. The government should not be able to do that with a mere flick of the wrist.
If anything a higher number of CCTV's is a good thing, assuming the number of all types of camera combined remains constant between cities.
Sims
in reply to Innerworld • • •OC, being propagandized local fools, they had to include unverified vilification of Russia and China + a focus on other societies than our own. Only a few very low figures from US/UK etc, despite: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveill…
Jeebus, US/Western propaganda/mindset is thin and embarrassing !
monetization of personal information
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)ForestWerewolf
in reply to Sims • • •☂️-
in reply to Sims • • •faizalr
in reply to Innerworld • • •vatlark
in reply to Innerworld • • •FoundFootFootage78
in reply to Innerworld • • •CCTV isn't a problem. It's mass surveillance. As the saying goes, "show me the man and I'll show you the crime". With enough information the state can always find something to turn their political enemy into a criminal. The government should not be able to do that with a mere flick of the wrist.
If anything a higher number of CCTV's is a good thing, assuming the number of all types of camera combined remains constant between cities.