It's not that it will be abused. It means this private company already does much more with it, about you. Oh wait, not a private company, one of the worst companies of all time
What part of this is humour? America has several death camps at the moment. People are actively disappearing from the system and can no longer be looked up. No one in the entire regime is able to locate them.
It's a combination of two things, the subversion of expectation, which is a common device in jokes, and the criticism of authority, which is another, similarly common, one.
In my comment, I'm pointing out that these cameras are a risk for even broader abuses than just subpoenas, and compliance with law enforcement requests under the guise of finding lost family members.
The responder humorously twists my words to claim that it's not a problem because the lost family members have already been swept up in an indiscriminate drag net, such that the cameras can not find them.
I was trying to point out that this feature may be even worse than that because it doesn't even require a formal law enforcement request. If this becomes what it looks like, even private contractors will be able to access it without raising any alarms, further lowering the bar.
Ad Company: How do we sell mass surveillance..... By helping sad kids and cute puppies. Keep it short so people don't have time to think to hard about it.
Yup. I wouldn't put it past the average person to see this and be happy. It hits the feel goods and for people who aren't already attuned to digital privacy concerns they likely aren't going to extrapolate the end game.
Privacy has always been a slippery slope issue which makes it very difficult to explain to people without sounding like a conspiracy theorist. Only when it's too late and people are negatively impacted does it become obvious, and by then it's too late.
Another area that isn't getting enough attention is Amazon Sidewalk. They're actively building out a network so these devices can share information (albeit limited) with each other even if you deny them internet access. Again, the tech is cool, but the possibilities are concerning.
As a kid I used to love tech and I remember reading CES coverage with anticipation and wonder. When Google Glass was demo'd I thought it was the coolest thing. Now there's no way I'd voluntarily put AR glasses that weren't FOSS on my face.
This is 100% the experience I have had. Could not vibe harder with this.
Most of the time people have paid a premium for their new watch, camera, door bell, service and you try to point out that it connecting to the cloud or AI is overly complicated and not required for the result they are so happy about. You go on to say that the company is probably selling, exploiting and using that data to minipulating you..... But you just come off as unhinged.
There is nothing good about america atm the only benifit is that there are some really good examples of why "I've got nothing to hide" is deeply flawed. This helps cut through to normal people.
Yeah finding the one application that people would support. Everyone loves dogs, well everyone except for our political and business leaders. ie the president and epstein and their like, they hate dogs, go figure.
It’s real. I watched it with my mouth hanging open. I know the capability has been there for a while but openly advertising it as a good truly shocked me.
my newest neighbors are having ring cameras installed in my apartment building and that combined with the knowledge that ring shares this data to the highest bidder (which is often the gov't), i feel like my civil rights are being violated every time i have to walk past the ring cameras every time i walk out my front door. lol
I don't know if you live in a state where you just get shot for nocking but calling the bell and explaining your concerns to them usually works at least for me.
it's more peculiar than that: the ring cameras were installed over a month ago, but neither tenants have moved in yet and they both clearly have money since they've both had their apartment renovated by professionals instead of the landlord's maintenance guys.
i'm guessing that these apartments are just their "city home" and i doubt that they will take kindly to a poor telling them how to live.
Ah i am feel ashamed. I wanted to put besides hairless cats. But i knew there are like a dozen cute ones in total. So i didnt thinking i was being mean.
Should we buy ring nodes and feed them poisoned video feed?
Benn Jordan was recently doing work on poisoned audio files, making it so models are damaged by ingesting his music. I believe the same should be possible with video streams.
They probably won’t be training on the poisoned nodes, but they sure as hell will be wasting power on them. That makes it more expensive to do this stuff, no?
For me personally, I wouldn't consider it worth the risk. You still have to make an Amazon account, hand over your personal information, let their cameras onto your network (of course, you can VLAN them) and.. how many people are gonna do this to make it effective?
It just seems playing right into their hands, I'd rather outright boycott anything Amazon (I understand easier for some than others) than waste my time, money and effort into protecting my personal info against a user hostile company.
I agree, that’s the most practical approach and I wouldn’t blame anyone for choosing it. For me personally, though, I’m a little pissed off that these companies get to have such inhostile environment for their shenanigans. It’s like a playground for them, where they get to happily A|B test the various surveillance state softwares that will eventually get sold to oppressive regimes (just like Flock). I’m at a point where I’m willing to spend a not-so-insignificant portion of my time, energy, and know-how on inventing a little bit more friction for them. It shouldn’t be so easy for them to fuck us. They didn’t even offer dinner, first.
The next step they'll take is hooking into the amber alert system to find missing kids. Then, it will be finding "criminals," which applies to basically everyone thanks to NPSM-7.
The "If I've got nothing to hide, why should I care" argument has predictably aged like sour milk.
The “If I’ve got nothing to hide, why should I care” argument has predictably aged like sour milk.
has it? the kind of critical thought that easily dispels this fallacy isn't being applied right now on a global scale as evidenced by the fact that people are blaming russia for the epstein illuminati ring.
Not sure that I'm following/understanding. I'm saying that skeptics of the "if I've got nothing to hide" argument were correct. You do have something to hide if the people in power suddenly change the definition of what's legal.
The fun part is that they're already at the "criminals" stage and we have been for a while. The marketing team is just backing into it and manufacturing consent.
I wonder how hard it would be to rework this advertisements to be what it's actually used for: - Immigrants spotted! Administrative warrant issued, ICE deployed! - Automatic License Plate Recognition with Flock (now a partner), found a "criminal". Administrative warrant issued, ICE deployed! - etc.
Ring was already "partnered" pretty closely with law enforcement, this is more of a consolidation than a new development. I've been saying this since they first floated the concept of CLOUD BASED SURVEILLANCE DOORBELLS but the whole idea is fucked. If you really feel a need for monitoring like that, set it up yourself. A corporation handling it is worse than nothing
Ted Kazcynski had somewhat of a point - I say somewhat because he was a leftist hater and I think a bit off the rails. Technology is already way out of control, I don't think most people understand that if there were to be a socialist revolution in a 1st world country any time soon, just how much of an advantage the state has over the people due to it's surveillance network. Privacy for all intents and purposes is practically gone already if you're of interest to the intelligence agencies and around anything with a connection and/or even just standing outside thanks to satellite imagery. And that is just the technology which we know of, it's horrifying to think about the possibility of tech that remains classified.
I agree with your main point, but I do want to criticize
I think he was a bit off the rails and a leftist hater.
This is an understatement. He was an ecofascist in all except name. In Industrial Society and Its Future, his critiques of the right basically boil down to "they're bad at optics" and his critiques of the left basically boil down to "they care about animals, [slurs], and women." He was the archetype of "claim to be centrist because I know how unpopular my actual opinions are."
That being said, I also want to shed light on a little glimmer of hope hidden inside the surveillance state:
if there were to be a socialist revolution in a 1st world country any time soon, just how much of an advantage the state has over the people due to it’s surveillance network.
A few counterpoints to this:
A point I learned from a movie of all places, no less poignant that it was a movie about resisting the surveillance state (Enemy of the State): one of the primary principles of Gueril
... Show more...
I agree with your main point, but I do want to criticize
I think he was a bit off the rails and a leftist hater.
This is an understatement. He was an ecofascist in all except name. In Industrial Society and Its Future, his critiques of the right basically boil down to "they're bad at optics" and his critiques of the left basically boil down to "they care about animals, [slurs], and women." He was the archetype of "claim to be centrist because I know how unpopular my actual opinions are."
That being said, I also want to shed light on a little glimmer of hope hidden inside the surveillance state:
if there were to be a socialist revolution in a 1st world country any time soon, just how much of an advantage the state has over the people due to it’s surveillance network.
A few counterpoints to this:
A point I learned from a movie of all places, no less poignant that it was a movie about resisting the surveillance state (Enemy of the State): one of the primary principles of Guerilla Warfare is to use your opponents biggest strength and turn it into their weakness. This leads me into my next point:
There is way too much data. A major part of the push for AI is because it can emulate human decision making while parsing orders of magnitude more data. Trying to find a person in Petabytes worth of video and imagery and metadata is like finding a needle in a hay-planet. Sure, they may have all that surveillance, but most of the signal gets lost in the billions of times more noise.
The government is not a monolith. The 50-agencies-in-a-trench-coat may try to pass themselves off as a unified entity, but when push comes to shove, they're a bunch of organizations that all have their own agenda, and each organization is just a bunch of people that all have their own agenda. Push hard enough, and you'll start to see the cracks form. Talk to any government employee and you'll soon realize their org is just as susceptible to all the internal bullshit squabbles that any private company is.
Piggybacking off of 2 and 3: they need manpower that they don't have. When we talk about "the state" or "the government," we can lose sight of the fact that these organizations aren't composed of countless, faceless people. Instead of 10% of all civilians, it's less than 1%. This number may still be huge compared to the size of local leftist org chapters and lemmy communities, but it's only like 1.3% of the working class.
Combining 3 and 4: the large majority of those government employees are also part of the proletariat. Their loyalty to the government only extends as far as their paycheck, and if any kind of class revolution were to kick into full swing, there would be a mass exodus of labor. There would also be hundreds of thousands of workers who are sympathetic to the cause on the inside, throwing wrenches in all kinds of cogs.
So yes, things are pretty bleak with the state of privacy in this day and age. No, there is no magical solution where an authoritarian government just willfully cedes its power to control its populace. No, there won't be any way to altogether avoid revolutionaries being incarcerated or worse. No, it won't fix itself, nor will somebody else take the reigns while we can comfortably be bystanders.
Such a beautiful reply, I wish I was as educated with my research & analysis as well as so articulate with my points as you are - instead of my typical half-assed rambling lol. Thank you and sorry for being overly pessimistic!
“they who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
Yes I know the issues with the founding father narrative. However, I think that this quote is very true and applies to the situation we are currently facing.
I hate it so much that these dystopian devices are all advertised as a positive thing and, worst of all, that there are millions of dumbasses going "well that sounds like a great idea!"
It's ads like this that make people think it's really great, without ever considering the surveillance aspect. Probably some people who now want to get Ring cameras, just so they can help track down lost dogs. Instead, it will be used to hunt down escaping humans.
What brand do people recommend to switch family members off to? I self host my security but for other family that aren't tech savvy at all which brands are good for privacy and intuitive to use?
Reolink. The cameras record to a SD card and the app connects to the cameras over the local network. The app can connect to the cameras remotely through Reolink’s servers for convenience, but it’s not necessary to use their cloud services. I block mine from the internet in the firewall.
Wife can even get to them when she's out because she has tailscale connecting her phone to the home network via my headscale control node, not that she could tell you that
Nextdoor is full of morons sharing their ring videos and then going, "Well my videos aren't being shared online to Amazon because I checked the 'privacy' settings."
Based on what I've seen, it is so so so much worse than you think. I honestly don't think the majority of those who see this ad will even consider negative uses of this system.
And if you are thinking 'how can people be that stupid', I will remind you that college professors are having to change their curriculums because many of their students can't read.
So yes, it's the day after the super bowl and I am quite sure the Gestapo cameras are flying off the shelves in the Amazon fulfillment centers.
That's actually insane to advertise that Gestapo feature. I'm literally shocked - which happens (unfortunately) rarely these days. There is so much shit going on in this world
::: spoiler Batman movie dialouge from IMDB, Morgan Freeman as Lucius Fox voices the consternation perfectly:
Batman: [seeing the wall of monitors for the first time at the Applied Sciences division in Wayne Enterprises] Beautiful, isn't it?
Lucius Fox: Beautiful... unethical... dangerous. You've turned every cellphone in Gotham into a microphone.
Batman: And a high-frequency generator-receiver.
Lucius Fox: You took my sonar concept and applied it to every phone in the city. With half the city feeding you sonar, you can image all of Gotham. This is wrong.
Batman: I've gotta find this man, Lucius.
Lucius Fox: At what cost?
Batman: The database is null-key encrypted. It can only be accessed by one person.
Lucius Fox: This is too much power for one person.
Batman: That's why I gave it to you. Only you can use it.
Lucius Fox: Spying on 30 million people isn't part of my job description. :::
itsathursday
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
bloubz
in reply to itsathursday • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
4am
in reply to itsathursday • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
Remember_the_tooth
in reply to 4am • • •Remember_the_tooth
in reply to itsathursday • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
huppakee
in reply to Remember_the_tooth • • •Remember_the_tooth
in reply to huppakee • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
PerogiBoi
in reply to Remember_the_tooth • • •What part of this is humour? America has several death camps at the moment. People are actively disappearing from the system and can no longer be looked up. No one in the entire regime is able to locate them.
What do you personally think happened to them?
Remember_the_tooth
in reply to PerogiBoi • • •It's a combination of two things, the subversion of expectation, which is a common device in jokes, and the criticism of authority, which is another, similarly common, one.
In my comment, I'm pointing out that these cameras are a risk for even broader abuses than just subpoenas, and compliance with law enforcement requests under the guise of finding lost family members.
The responder humorously twists my words to claim that it's not a problem because the lost family members have already been swept up in an indiscriminate drag net, such that the cameras can not find them.
The joke is on the DHS, and not it's victims.
hector
in reply to Remember_the_tooth • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
Remember_the_tooth
in reply to hector • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
criticon
in reply to Remember_the_tooth • • •Remember_the_tooth
in reply to criticon • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
Rokin
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
Zoldyck
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
irate944
in reply to Zoldyck • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
PostaL
in reply to Zoldyck • • •greenbelt
in reply to Zoldyck • • •unknown
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
foggenbooty
in reply to unknown • • •Yup. I wouldn't put it past the average person to see this and be happy. It hits the feel goods and for people who aren't already attuned to digital privacy concerns they likely aren't going to extrapolate the end game.
Privacy has always been a slippery slope issue which makes it very difficult to explain to people without sounding like a conspiracy theorist. Only when it's too late and people are negatively impacted does it become obvious, and by then it's too late.
Another area that isn't getting enough attention is Amazon Sidewalk. They're actively building out a network so these devices can share information (albeit limited) with each other even if you deny them internet access. Again, the tech is cool, but the possibilities are concerning.
As a kid I used to love tech and I remember reading CES coverage with anticipation and wonder. When Google Glass was demo'd I thought it was the coolest thing. Now there's no way I'd voluntarily put AR glasses that weren't FOSS on my face.
unknown
in reply to foggenbooty • • •This is 100% the experience I have had. Could not vibe harder with this.
Most of the time people have paid a premium for their new watch, camera, door bell, service and you try to point out that it connecting to the cloud or AI is overly complicated and not required for the result they are so happy about. You go on to say that the company is probably selling, exploiting and using that data to minipulating you..... But you just come off as unhinged.
There is nothing good about america atm the only benifit is that there are some really good examples of why "I've got nothing to hide" is deeply flawed. This helps cut through to normal people.
bonenode
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •hector
in reply to bonenode • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
TDCN
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •RunJun
in reply to TDCN • • •chunkystyles
in reply to RunJun • • •systemglitch
in reply to TDCN • • •It's been real for a long time now, this is how ring works. You have to manually turn this stuff off and no one does.
There are some informative videos on this spy network.
eldavi
in reply to systemglitch • • •Gonzako
in reply to eldavi • • •eldavi
in reply to Gonzako • • •it's more peculiar than that: the ring cameras were installed over a month ago, but neither tenants have moved in yet and they both clearly have money since they've both had their apartment renovated by professionals instead of the landlord's maintenance guys.
i'm guessing that these apartments are just their "city home" and i doubt that they will take kindly to a poor telling them how to live.
audaxdreik
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •"since launch, more than a dog a day has been reunited with their family"
Yeah, because cats know how to evade the fascist state. All Cats Are Beautiful ...
like this
Maeve likes this.
tomiant
in reply to audaxdreik • • •Breezy
in reply to tomiant • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
CannonFodder
in reply to Breezy • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
Breezy
in reply to CannonFodder • • •Ah i am feel ashamed. I wanted to put besides hairless cats. But i knew there are like a dozen cute ones in total. So i didnt thinking i was being mean.
Im gonna downvote my own comment.
tomiant
in reply to Breezy • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
Breezy
in reply to tomiant • • •tomiant
in reply to Breezy • • •Dessalines
in reply to tomiant • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
tomiant
in reply to CannonFodder • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
Dessalines
in reply to CannonFodder • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
tomenzgg
in reply to CannonFodder • • •errer
in reply to audaxdreik • • •frunch
in reply to errer • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
yucandu
in reply to frunch • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
frunch
in reply to yucandu • • •Flames5123
in reply to yucandu • • •ToTheGraveMyLove
in reply to audaxdreik • • •tomiant
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
krashmo
in reply to tomiant • • •ToTheGraveMyLove
in reply to krashmo • • •ToTheGraveMyLove
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
partofthevoice
in reply to ToTheGraveMyLove • • •Should we buy ring nodes and feed them poisoned video feed?
Benn Jordan was recently doing work on poisoned audio files, making it so models are damaged by ingesting his music. I believe the same should be possible with video streams.
They probably won’t be training on the poisoned nodes, but they sure as hell will be wasting power on them. That makes it more expensive to do this stuff, no?
JustARegularNerd
in reply to partofthevoice • • •For me personally, I wouldn't consider it worth the risk. You still have to make an Amazon account, hand over your personal information, let their cameras onto your network (of course, you can VLAN them) and.. how many people are gonna do this to make it effective?
It just seems playing right into their hands, I'd rather outright boycott anything Amazon (I understand easier for some than others) than waste my time, money and effort into protecting my personal info against a user hostile company.
like this
Maeve likes this.
partofthevoice
in reply to JustARegularNerd • • •zebidiah
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •yucandu
in reply to zebidiah • • •NOPper
in reply to yucandu • • •eldavi
in reply to NOPper • • •did you mean war drive? are people still war driving?
NOPper
in reply to eldavi • • •I did, but that's hilarious so I'm gonna keep it.
I commute and travel a good amount, it gives be something interesting to do 🤷♂️
Chulk
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •The next step they'll take is hooking into the amber alert system to find missing kids. Then, it will be finding "criminals," which applies to basically everyone thanks to NPSM-7.
The "If I've got nothing to hide, why should I care" argument has predictably aged like sour milk.
Trump’s NSPM-7 Labels Common Beliefs As Terrorism “Indicators”
Ken Klippensteinlike this
Maeve likes this.
eldavi
in reply to Chulk • • •has it? the kind of critical thought that easily dispels this fallacy isn't being applied right now on a global scale as evidenced by the fact that people are blaming russia for the epstein illuminati ring.
like this
Maeve likes this.
Chulk
in reply to eldavi • • •eldavi
in reply to Chulk • • •the "i have nothing to hide" argument is easily dispelled by several avenues of critical thought; including the one your comment points out.
this sort of critical thought is not being applied to the russia/epstein narrative that's taking hold on american politics right now.
Chulk
in reply to Chulk • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
Doomsider
in reply to Chulk • • •johncandy1812
in reply to Chulk • • •tomatolung
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •- Immigrants spotted! Administrative warrant issued, ICE deployed!
- Automatic License Plate Recognition with Flock (now a partner), found a "criminal". Administrative warrant issued, ICE deployed!
- etc.
like this
Maeve likes this.
Riyria
in reply to tomatolung • • •douglasg14b
in reply to Riyria • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
Riyria
in reply to douglasg14b • • •Crozekiel
in reply to Riyria • • •Jackhammer_Joe
in reply to Crozekiel • • •moonshadow
in reply to Riyria • • •thatkomputerkat
in reply to Riyria • • •Amazon's Ring to partner with Flock, a network of AI cameras used by ICE, feds, and police | TechCrunch
Amanda Silberling (TechCrunch)verdi
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •ShotDonkey
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •SPRAYPAINT EVERY SINGLE ONE.
CALL THEIR OWNERS OUT.
DESTROY. THAT. SHIT.
(Writing this with a device in my hand with a front and several back cameras, super sensitive microphone, and internet acces)
TDCN
in reply to ShotDonkey • • •Truscape
in reply to ShotDonkey • • •Arthur Besse
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •manuallybreathing
in reply to Arthur Besse • • •Xylight
in reply to manuallybreathing • • •ExistentialNightmare
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •GaumBeist
in reply to ExistentialNightmare • • •I agree with your main point, but I do want to criticize
This is an understatement. He was an ecofascist in all except name. In Industrial Society and Its Future, his critiques of the right basically boil down to "they're bad at optics" and his critiques of the left basically boil down to "they care about animals, [slurs], and women." He was the archetype of "claim to be centrist because I know how unpopular my actual opinions are."
That being said, I also want to shed light on a little glimmer of hope hidden inside the surveillance state:
A few counterpoints to this:
- A point I learned from a movie of all places, no less poignant that it was a movie about resisting the surveillance state (Enemy of the State): one of the primary principles of Gueril
... Show more...I agree with your main point, but I do want to criticize
This is an understatement. He was an ecofascist in all except name. In Industrial Society and Its Future, his critiques of the right basically boil down to "they're bad at optics" and his critiques of the left basically boil down to "they care about animals, [slurs], and women." He was the archetype of "claim to be centrist because I know how unpopular my actual opinions are."
That being said, I also want to shed light on a little glimmer of hope hidden inside the surveillance state:
A few counterpoints to this:
So yes, things are pretty bleak with the state of privacy in this day and age. No, there is no magical solution where an authoritarian government just willfully cedes its power to control its populace. No, there won't be any way to altogether avoid revolutionaries being incarcerated or worse. No, it won't fix itself, nor will somebody else take the reigns while we can comfortably be bystanders.
But it's not already a lost cause.
ExistentialNightmare
in reply to GaumBeist • • •manuallybreathing
in reply to GaumBeist • • •Formfiller
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •“they who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
Yes I know the issues with the founding father narrative. However, I think that this quote is very true and applies to the situation we are currently facing.
aeration1217
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •Phoenixz
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •BarneyPiccolo
in reply to Phoenixz • • •modus
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •nullee
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •chemicalprophet
in reply to nullee • • •Liberal_Ghost
in reply to nullee • • •manuallybreathing
in reply to nullee • • •lando55
in reply to manuallybreathing • • •melfie
in reply to nullee • • •gnuplusmatt
in reply to melfie • • •this is precisely my setup too.
Wife can even get to them when she's out because she has tailscale connecting her phone to the home network via my headscale control node, not that she could tell you that
CleoCommunist
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •StarvingMartist
in reply to CleoCommunist • • •ForeverComical
in reply to StarvingMartist • • •Fortunafors
in reply to ForeverComical • • •Jackhammer_Joe
in reply to Fortunafors • • •sudoer777
in reply to StarvingMartist • • •eldavi
in reply to sudoer777 • • •CleoCommunist
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •CleoCommunist
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •CleoCommunist
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •deathbird
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •chunes
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •ByteOnBikes
in reply to chunes • • •Yes.
Nextdoor is full of morons sharing their ring videos and then going, "Well my videos aren't being shared online to Amazon because I checked the 'privacy' settings."
SirEDCaLot
in reply to chunes • • •Based on what I've seen, it is so so so much worse than you think.
I honestly don't think the majority of those who see this ad will even consider negative uses of this system.
And if you are thinking 'how can people be that stupid', I will remind you that college professors are having to change their curriculums because many of their students can't read.
So yes, it's the day after the super bowl and I am quite sure the Gestapo cameras are flying off the shelves in the Amazon fulfillment centers.
Gen Z are arriving to college unable to even read a sentence—professors warn it could lead to a generation of anxious and lonely graduates
Preston Fore (Fortune)PerogiBoi
in reply to chunes • • •Jackhammer_Joe
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •BigDiction
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •agingelderly
in reply to BigDiction • • •treesquid
in reply to agingelderly • • •BarneyPiccolo
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •VerilyFemme
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •Omfg I just watched this elsewhere. Also it's free. How kind of them.
I think this is just trying to put a good spin on it before any privacy concerns come up.
greenbelt
in reply to IndustryStandard • • •The only counter to this: Sousveillance.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sousveil…
Related Batman quotes:
::: spoiler Batman movie dialouge
from IMDB, Morgan Freeman as Lucius Fox voices the consternation perfectly:
recording of an activity by a participant in the activity, typically by way of small wearable or portable personal technologies
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)