Skip to main content


Browser Fingerprinting And Why VPNs Won’t Make You Anonymous


Damn... I guess the next idea is going offline for good
in reply to BeatTakeshi

Ultimately being truly anonymous on the internet is pretty hard, and thus VPNs are mostly helpful for getting around region blocks for streaming services, not for obtaining more privacy.


I disagree.

There seems to constantly be two sides of the privacy discussion with public VPN options and they're both wrong on their own. It's correct that using a VPN on its own is not enough to keep you private online, fingerprinting being one example to why. However, not using a VPN but having no identifiable browser fingerprint doesn't either, since your IP is still a fingerprint too.

I like to give the following analogies:
1. Doing only an oil change on your vehicle but no other maintenance won't keep your vehicle running forever
2. Doing all vehicle maintenances except oil changes won't keep your vehicle running forever

If the goal is to be private, remember that a VPN is only one tool in a very large tool belt.

in reply to Tatar_Nobility

Tor is definitely another option. For my personal use however, I have my entire network covered by a VPN so all outgoing traffic uses it.

I'm sure I could setup Tor to do the same, but I imagine my family and I would get blocked more heavily on sites, as well as get our bank accounts and such flagged or something.

Like many things, it obviously depends on your threat model.

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to BeatTakeshi

Back in the day there were apps that generated phony web searches to obfuscate your real searches.
Seems like there could be tools to mess around and change browser fingerprints periodically. No?
in reply to SteveCC

There's this but it blocks only one of the many methods voyeurs use.

addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firef…

in reply to RheumatoidArthritis

And Canvas Blocker (which only optionally blocks but randomizes them). But Firefox has that built-in now; canvas fingerprinting should be pretty much useless there.
in reply to SteveCC

It could be done on the browser level (maybe it's something browsers like LibreWolf do), however, it would break sites that require the fingerprints to be the same for "security reasons" which may or may not be a legitimate claim.

You could say "well, I'm not going to use that particular website then", but the problem is that there are less and less websites that don't require these technologies to function properly.

in reply to PowerCrazy

in reply to SteveCC

There is a browser extension called Chameleon that will spoof a fair amount of data, but after testing it against one of those fingerprint test sites, it looks like it doesn't/can't spoof everything.
in reply to SteveCC

Already done, see: github.com/uazo/cromite

When I go to the fingerprint test, a bunch of the values like canvas resolution and timezone are randomized.

...Not everything, though.

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to brucethemoose

Interesting... Tor, Mullvad, and other secure browsers, go to the exact opposite approach, though... they try to make everyone look the same so they can't tell you apart across IPs
in reply to PiraHxCx

Yeah, exactly.

Cromite's explicit focus is, literally, antifingerprinting. With the goal of breaking cross site tracking I guess.

A more accurate goal for Tor/Mullvad is anonymizing, e.g. “blending in with the crowd.”

It’s like radically changing your clothes every day vs wearing super incognito stuff. Different means, each more optimal for different aspects of security/privacy.

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to BeatTakeshi

Here are some extra tips for increased privacy:
- Don´t use your browser in fullscreen
- Download Chameleon for Firefox, it periodically changes the browser and OS it pretends to be

OR: Use Chameleon and set yourself to the most common combo. Get lost in the noise.

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Twongo [she/her]

Why no full screen? The second point makes sense and I might go back to using FF, but I can fathom what not going full screen accomplishes.
in reply to AsoFiafia

look at my reply on the other comment :)
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Twongo [she/her]

Thanks! I had no idea. I figured the resolution came from system specs. This is good to know. Although, I’m super close to just banishing the internet entirely. Tracking is getting out of hand…

Edit: corrected “vanishing” to “banishing.” Autocorrect. 🙄

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to BeatTakeshi

randomlzing your window size shows trackers different resolutions.

depending on which OS you use it won't show 1920x1080, as taskbars and other extras take off a few pixels.

example: if your browser is fullscreen and only shows a resolution of 1920x1075 it could most likely mean you use macos (randomly chosen)

in reply to Twongo [she/her]

Librewolf has letterboxing which locks your website's intrinsic size to specific resolutions (like 1600x1000) to combat this
in reply to BeatTakeshi

Just use Tor or Mullvad browser (you don't need to use the Tor Network or Mullvad VPN, you can bring your own).

That said the wasted screen real-estate is a dealbreaker for me. So if I'm not gonna log in then I'll go with a fully separate installation.

in reply to BeatTakeshi

But VPNs aren't supposed to make you anonymous.
They secure your data while in transit to/from the exit node. Maybe that's your job so you can access their LAN. Or it's a public VPN that secures your dada from the local WiFi or ISP you're directly connected to. That's all it's built for.
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Steve

And what do you thing HTTPS does exactly? Whe the web was HTTP sure VPN's had a point as people on public wifi could sniff your trafic. Now they can't.
in reply to Auli

It only encrypts the data within the HTTPS packet. But where that packet is going is still transparent.

It also doesn't do anything for non web traffic. Email through SMTP or IMAP, FTP, lots of things don't use HTTP at all.

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to BeatTakeshi

no shit

I use VPN because of the ISP and the network, not to become anonymous to the websites I visit.

in reply to BeatTakeshi

Doesn't browser with anti-fingerpriting give the same settings to everyone using that browser so they all look like the same person?
in reply to PiraHxCx

Yes and I think that's kinda dumb. It's never going to be possible to have everyone look the same. I would go the other route. Randomize everything everytime so you never leave twice the same fingerprints. That's way easier and it polutes marketers dabases, which is a double win.
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to primalmotion

If you are using a popular VPN I guess that's an option, but if you are going through the onion, where several nodes are being monitored, being the only guy that looks different, regardless if each time is a different different, just makes you too easy to be tracked :P
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to BeatTakeshi

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to BeatTakeshi

I just tried the Am I Unique site and I'm surprised by the amount of information the sites can have. Why do they know if I'm connected using 4G or 5G for example? Even using a privacy browser
in reply to BeatTakeshi

This is a bit of a misnomer. No one PC can be fully anonymized or fully private, even if the PC provided fake data points, they will still be technically fingerprinted. Having said that, having a browser that tries to spoof stuff like LibreWolf, Tor or IronFox is decent.

The gains in using a VPN, among other best practices is that helps --assuming people do not log on to something like Google-- is to minimize the fingerprint of the PC to you, as a user. Assuming one trust their VPN provider, helps.

Tor leverages the point of having all users look and be fingerprinted mostly as the same, so you get lost in the shuffle and crowd.