Skip to main content

Glen Greenwald is on topic presenting the free speech constraints imposed by Bill HR6090.

#freedom #firstamendment #1a #censorship #lawfare #antiwar

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aBz5UwrL8YE


Congress Pushes to Silence Israel Critics with "Antisemitism Awareness" Bill

This is a clip from our show SYSTEM UPDATE, now airing every weeknight at 7pm ET on Rumble. You can watch the full episode for FREE here: https://rumble.com/...
YouTube
#freedom #censorship #FirstAmendment #1A #antiwar #lawfare
in reply to nicholas_saunders

saahbs
saahbs
• •
@nicholas_saunders it can be be used for anything receiving federal funding or in lawfare. Are you young or naive thinking this will be narrowly abused by government (and private parties)??!?
@nicholas_saunders
in reply to saahbs

nicholas_saunders
nicholas_saunders
• •
golly, your remarkably defensive, and offensive, reply would indicate, that, indeed, this law would only effect institutions and isn't, in fact, an abrogation of free speech in any way.
in reply to nicholas_saunders

saahbs
saahbs
• •
@nicholas_saunders good luck troll.
@nicholas_saunders
in reply to saahbs

nicholas_saunders
nicholas_saunders
• •
so, after implicitly acknowledging that there's no first amendment issue, you've now resorted to throwing baseless epithets.
in reply to nicholas_saunders

saahbs
saahbs
• •
@nicholas_saunders you can keep reiterating your beliefs (trolling), keep going, it doesn't challange any of the points presented by Glen Greenwald and numerous other #1a concerned voices. I encourage anyone reading this to listen to Glen Greenwald's video, then read @nicholas_saunders meek rebuttals and then make their own mind.
#1A @nicholas_saunders
in reply to saahbs

nicholas_saunders
nicholas_saunders
• •

given your inability to articulate his points, that seems unlikely. I happen to subscribe to his podcast, where he often gets the details "wrong" to advance his position.

Don't get me wrong, he's a great journalist and thinks very carefully -- but he does blind spots.

in reply to nicholas_saunders

a goat‽
a goat‽
• •

@nicholas_saunders is a troll BTW, you can safely ignore him.

He doesn't care about words, meaning, truth in general...

@nicholas_saunders
in reply to a goat‽

saahbs
saahbs
• •
@nus thanks, suspected as much, observed him engage in twisting my extremely brief summary (his abrogation rephrasing != my claimed constrain), his feigned offense, his extremely narrow and naive reading of the bill, etc.
⇧