Skip to main content


If a journal asks me to do a peer-review for them, which I accept, then it makes a decision before the review deadline, without waiting for my review, and without letting me know that I do not need to do the review.. while I use my spare time to complete the peer-review by the deadline... then I am not going to do any more peer-review for that journal 🤷

(#PLoSOne in this case 🫤)
#AcademicChatter #PeerReview

in reply to El Duvelle

it's unfortunate they probably felt so much (financial) pressure to speed up their review times to match their competitors that they instituted a system where that can happen
in reply to Alex Holcombe

@alexh Maybe, but that shouldn't prevent them from warning their reviewers if they don't need to do a review anymore..
in reply to El Duvelle

@alexh scientific publishing needs a complete overhaul. there is no other industry where the distributor
1. Receives content for free
2. Filters content for free/pocket change (editors)
3. QCs content for free (reviewers)
4. Then asks money for free content to be published (publishing fee)
5. Then asks for more money for content they received for free to be freely accessible (open access fee).

It's a total scam.
link.springer.com/article/10.1…

in reply to acm

@acm_redfox that's unfortunately the 2nd time I hear about a journal doing that, the other one was #ScientificReports.. Well of course #MDPI journals also seem to do it all the time..
in reply to El Duvelle

usually there's a whole infrastructure to prod reviewers to finish up -- are they only pretending to do peer review at all, or are they asking an excess of people and just moving ahead when they get some kind of quorum?? 🤨
⇧