Just a little bit frustrating to read people saying "the Fediverse should have starter packs" when I've spent the last four+ years hand-curating recommended accounts to follow on @FediFollows and fedi.directory
I'm not the only person doing this kind of initiative, the Trunk directory (communitywiki.org/trunk) was the first, and the Fediverse.info directory by @dansup (fediverse.info/explore/people) is an automated way for people to add themselves to suggested lists.
We already have these things on the Fedi, people just need to ask around and discover them, and let their friends know about them.
Fedi.Directory โ Interesting accounts on Mastodon & the Fediverse
Interesting accounts to follow on Mastodon and the Fediversefedi.directory
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
timorl likes this.
reshared this
Nat Mierau
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •You ARE the starter pack
All of the folks helping people find others in the fedi are very appreciated
Thoralf Will ๐บ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฑ
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •It will remain this way unless those recommendations pop up automatically in the default client.
Only nerds will read through wiki pages or the like to find lists.
The average user expects the client to display recommendations all by themselves.
There is no point in discussion here. It's just the way it is.
@FediFollows @dansup
FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐
in reply to Thoralf Will ๐บ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฑ • • •@thoralf
"There is no point in discussion here. It's just the way it is."
Oh thank you, that's a wonderful way to respond to volunteers who are trying to provide free services for he sake of the community.
You seem to be saying "give up, go home, don't bother, only centralised networks are worth anything."
Thoralf Will ๐บ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฑ
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Would it help you if I would lie to you and tell you to just continue the way it is?
I really appreciate your work. I like it.
But if you really want to reach new users (which I assume you want), you need to find a way to get the content into the clients itself.
FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐
in reply to Thoralf Will ๐บ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฑ • • •@thoralf
If you go down the path of even having default clients, you will end up enshittifying and the whole point of the Fediverse would be lost.
Anything that centralises this place takes away the point of it existing.
Thoralf Will ๐บ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฑ
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •You already have a default client and a default web interface.
We can keep holding the holy grail of maximum decentralization and non-corporatism up, sure.
But that will also mean that we will not be able to leave the tiny niche that we live in, ever.
That's fine for many people.
But it will also mean that the influence of the fediverse remains borderline zero, because the gravitational force is just not here.
FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐
in reply to Thoralf Will ๐บ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฑ • • •No, the "default client" only appeared in 2022 but Mastodon began in 2016.
And why bother doing this place if you think that centralisation is the only viable option?
If you're comfortable with what centralisation causes, why are you on here? If you want numbers above all else, why are you here? The things that make this a nice place to be depend on us not going down the path of centralisation.
Thoralf Will ๐บ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฑ
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •The world is not black and white and >>90% of the users joined within the last 2 years.
If we want the fediverse to be anything but a nerds-only-island, we have to find a balance between "all decentralized" and what's necessary to be attractive to non-nerds.
FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐
in reply to Thoralf Will ๐บ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฑ • • •Having a centralised client means it's attractive to those who would take it over.
It means that if a platform becomes popular, someone can just offer the owner of the default client X billion dolllars and start injecting all kinds of enshittification through it.
It's not balance if you are leaving an opening for easy takeover.
This isn't some never-before-done thing, there have been decentralised networks without a default client for a long time. What is the default client for email? What is the default client for the phone network?
Thoralf Will ๐บ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฑ
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •It's the one provided by @Gargron - and we even have a default instance as well: mastodon.social.
FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐
in reply to Thoralf Will ๐บ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฑ • • •Sure, and that's a horrible mistake because it would make it very easy for someone to take over.
Most of the people who work on the Fedi are unpaid volunteers. Do you really think they should be giving up their time just to make a network that can be easily taken over?
The idea of this place, the reason people pour so much effort into it without getting paid, is to make something that cannot be taken over, that is defended against people like Musk.
Your suggestions would make it much easier for Musk etc to take over.
Kadsepfรถsch
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •@thoralf I agree there should be no default client but the point of Thoralf is valid.
If you don't actually and actively search for fedi.directory you don't know it exists. You would need a starter pack to have it part of the onboarding experience.
It doesn't need to be centralised. But a possibility for the instance server to shove some info in the new users face would be good. Have an automated announcement for each new user that could have a link to fedi.directory.
NaClKnight is Black online!
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •I think @thoralf is being too blunt about it, but @FediThing , from my perspective, a starter pack that people have to be told about in order to find doesn't function as a starter pack.
It's a useful resource spread by word of mouth from the people who remember it exists to the people who they remember to tell. But it's not something people can start with, cause by default they're not aware it exists.
The people most likely to face the "empty feed" issue are the ones least likely to have existing relationships here, or anyone to tell them about your work.
All i have are experiences and anecdotes, including from my friends, about this place and the experience of using it. I'm a mechanical engineer and a writer, not a dev, so it's possible I'm grossly misunderstanding something here, but that's how i see it.
FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐
in reply to NaClKnight is Black online! • • •@NaClKnight @thoralf
"that people have to be told about in order to find doesn't function as a starter pack....cause by default they're not aware it exists. "
How can everyone see something by default? By everyone using a particular app? By everyone signing up on a particular site?
If people do that, then the platform is centralised, and we're right back to where we started with Facebook, Twitter etc. Someone can take over that site, app etc and ruin whatever community we build up.
A lot of things are easier on centralised platforms because they are centralised, but centralisation makes them enshittify and explot their users.
NaClKnight is Black online!
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •I'm not trying to be hostile. I think there is a genuine mismatch between intent and effect. I won't be the one who devises the eventual solution. You couldn't pay me to write a line of code.
But if your almighty concern is centralization then do onboarding at the instance level. Make the onboarding link(s)/experience a choice each instance admin selects for new users, like how discord servers do.
There are options to do this without "centralization*
I'm not a dev, so some of these may not be viable but
offer user created feeds like "sports" or "tech" that each bundle a few relevant hashtags
offer user created lists of users to start following. Many users would love to be on those lists. Implement some toggle or method for users who don't want to be on that kind of starter pack list to remove themselves or prevent it
The implementation will be different, but I'm not saying that each Mastodon server needs to handle onboarding the same way.
I'm asking why, or how, would new users know about your work on onboarding? where would they have found o
... Show more...I'm not trying to be hostile. I think there is a genuine mismatch between intent and effect. I won't be the one who devises the eventual solution. You couldn't pay me to write a line of code.
But if your almighty concern is centralization then do onboarding at the instance level. Make the onboarding link(s)/experience a choice each instance admin selects for new users, like how discord servers do.
There are options to do this without "centralization*
I'm not a dev, so some of these may not be viable but
offer user created feeds like "sports" or "tech" that each bundle a few relevant hashtags
offer user created lists of users to start following. Many users would love to be on those lists. Implement some toggle or method for users who don't want to be on that kind of starter pack list to remove themselves or prevent it
The implementation will be different, but I'm not saying that each Mastodon server needs to handle onboarding the same way.
I'm asking why, or how, would new users know about your work on onboarding? where would they have found out about it? How would they have stumbled over that link?
If the answer is "word of mouth" then that's not onboarding. That's advice. That's a pro tip.
FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •p.s. The very first sentence on fedi.directory has been on there for years before bluesky and reads:
"This is a human-curated small selection of interesting accounts to help you get started on Mastodon and the Fediverse. "
How is that not a starter pack?
Fedi.Directory โ Interesting accounts on Mastodon & the Fediverse
fedi.directoryMoreau Vazh
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Clive Thompson
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Itโs a terrific list! Iโve used it to find all sorts of great stuff
What makes the UI of starter packs on Bluesky so useful for onboarding new folks, I think, is how it lets one follow a whole list oโ people in a single click
which is not a UI challenge any individual list-maker here in the fediverse can solve โฆ. Itโs a UI issue at the level of the client
JamesOnTheRun
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •OkazuYuri
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Thank you for your efforts in that regard.
What people mean, of course, is that they wish Mastodon made it easy, like Bsky does.
That innovation, along with block lists may well be what make Bluesky the predominant social. It's #2 right now behind FB.
FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐
in reply to OkazuYuri • • •That really isn't what they're saying. They're saying they think starter packs don't exist at all.
OkazuYuri
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •El Duvelle
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •First, thank you for your work on this! We all really appreciate it!
The problem with something that "people just need to ask around and discover" is that it requires effort and initiative on the part of the user. The reason why people seem to love those Starter Packs is that it requires no effort. This is another example where Mastodon / the fediverse requires more effort than their competition and it is one of the things that drive people away.
If there was a way to convert your curated accounts into public Lists that people could follow in one-click, that would be really great. Until then it just makes sense from a human point of view that people will prefer a "starter pack" to having to go to a separate website, look for a theme they like, then, copy paste individual account names into their mastodon app and click follow (*100 times or more). ๐
FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐
in reply to El Duvelle • • •@elduvelle
That's not what people are saying though.
They're not saying Fedi starter packs should be one click. If they were, I'd agree with them, it would be great.
They're saying Fedi starter packs don't exist at all.
El Duvelle
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Nathalie Van Raemdonck
in reply to El Duvelle • • •Your efforts are appreciated @FediThing
but you're underestimating certain barriers. it's not just about 'effort', not everyone entered this platform with community or has the social capital to 'ask around' to find such lists. As @kissane wrote in her amazing piece on 'picking shoes' wrecka.ge/fediverse-shoes/ if you're new it's difficult to find your way around.
how to buy shoes in the fediverse
Erin Kissane (wreckage/salvage)Natasha Nox ๐บ๐ฆ๐ต๐ธ
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Having the main entry point of new users (app stores) under control of a BDFL ("benevolent dictator for life") who's rather bad at his job is a huge problem. Third party projects like yours will most likely not gain sufficient reach without his support.
Sonhasherd
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Petra van Cronenburg
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •This. My #StarterPack to the Fediverse were you with @FediTips and your wonderful short guide!
I know there are many who criticise the fact that not everything is automatically served to you like in a pig trough. But that's exactly why Mastodon has done me so much good: I've become active again and am organising my own communication here.
People also forget that the Fediverse works on donations, not ads or billionaires.
Pablo Berganza (he/him)
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Starter packs in bluesky feel mildly different, though. Since theyโre hand curated lists that every individual user can make, itโs specially enticing if the starter pack is made by a user you like or โtrustโ.
I specially like that you can go in someoneโs profile and the starter packs theyโve made are visible in their profile. It feels โpersonalโ maybe?
Eric in Alabama
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •patricus
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •searching for someone like that.
Robert Kingett
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •SatinBrooch
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Leigh Silvester
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Possibly an issue might be delivery and signposting.
Unless things have changed, which they might have, on sign-up and first dive into the Fediverse there is no initial message or screen to help folk find these sorts of fantastic resources and guidance on first steps, fediquette etc.
This may vary by instance.
Benjamin
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •That tool is very cool (adding myself rn), but it serves a different purpose:
"I think you might want to follow ME if you're into <topic>."
versus
"I think you might want to follow THESE ACCOUNTS if you're into <topic>."
Both approaches are valid, but they have different focus. ME vs THEM.
GamingOnLinux has made some great starter packs of BlueSky accounts by topic to follow, and it's easy to follow those accounts from your own, kickstarting new joiners.
Matt McManus
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •building the lists is an important part (thank you!) but is just the beginning. Starter packs have critical UX improvements that make the lists discoverable and easy to action that Mastodon doesnโt have.
I think the infrastructure is there in the Lists feature, it just needs a better way to view the users on the list and to integrate those lists meaningfully throughout the onboarding experience to help folks find them.
rsp
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •bsky.social/about/blog/06-26-2โฆ
Introducing Bluesky Starter Packs - Bluesky
BlueskyMastodon Migration
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •FediThing, your work is amazing! The purpose is here is not to criticize, but rather to discuss how this work can be made more accessible.
It seems that the primary issue is the ease of use. When someone has to do the paste the address into their search box thing, that loses 95% of ordinary Mastodon users and 99% of potential newcomers.
So, the challenge has to be, how to give users clickable addresses given the technical constraints of the Fediverse?
1/n
Joseph Finger
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •@wir
Kรถnnten wir nicht einige Links mit Guides an die Willkommens-Email anhรคngen, die jeder bekommt, wenn er sich auf f.s anmeldet ?
mellowfish
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Anders Norรฉn
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •That's great for you.
However, I don't have a starter pack. And writing down a list of names on a Web page isn't really the kind of functionality people are asking for.
Moritz Poldrack :arch:
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •LiquidParasyte
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •your work is absolutely invaluable and appreciated; but it would be even more effective if it was deeper integrated into fedi software.
Making it easier to make these lists would not detract from your work, but rather make it more engaged with and visible.
Dan McAlister
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •radio free fedi
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •I point artists, other projects, and passers by to your resources so often in the feed, in blog links, in meetings.
Sorry to see your work slighted by complicit followers of "leaders" advancing clout silos. Respect to the classic fedi volunteers and friends making good things for humans despite being berated, ignored, costed, exhausted or bullied out of our spaces.
Solidarity friend.
Folks, support community first and human scaled inclusive growth and platforms after.
William B Peckham
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Samir Al-Battran
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •To be honest, the issue is not that it doesn't exist, but the discovery of tools isn't great. Not blaming you, as much as we shouldn't blame users
However, people on the Fediverse need to work with each other to expand awareness, building something and waiting for them to come is not viable, it's much easier for users to discover tools in a centralized platform
I built so many tools and I have worked hard to collaborate here but always found cold response so ๐คทโโ๏ธ
Moxxi ๐
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ช๐จ๐ณๅผ ๆฎฟๆ๐จ๐ณ๐ฉ๐ช๐จ๐ฆ
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •It would help if the search results made any kind of sense. For example, literally my first search on Fedi.Directory gave this result.
I appreciate the work being put into these kinds of initiatives, but scolding people for not recommending them in the face of this kind of test result seems a bit over the top.
Erik Jonker
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •JW Prince of CPH, Radicalized
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •These are amazing, thanks, didn't know about this resource ๐
To be fair, though, this isn't what most people mean when they say "starter packs". This is at least intermediate.
Think of it as a cooking class; you don't show a bunch of people who don't know how to cook a warehouse full of ingredients & go "Get cooking!" - they'd be overwhelmed & bail, no matter how well-organized & high-quality the warehouse contents are. Show them how to make an easy, tasty dish first.
Emil Jacobs - Collectifission
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Perhaps the reason people are calling for starter packs, is because it gives the power to do this thing on your own, instead of being dependent on the good will of someone else.
For example, I've asked a few times now to be included, and I'm completely ignored.
Latest attempt: greennuclear.online/@collectifโฆ
Emil Jacobs - Collectifission (@collectifission@greennuclear.online)
Green Nuclear๐พ codkelpme
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •tante
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •- integration in the default experience
- the personal touch ("this list is made by someone I personally trust")
It looks similar on a surface level but the sociotechnical context and the vibe is totally different (and those things are part of the product)
hazelnot :yell:
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •ใฑใฌใ ใใ ๐ดโโ ๏ธ :unverified:
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •AboutBentham
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Maria Langer | ๐ ๐ฌ โ๏ธ๐ฅ๏ธ
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •๐ก๐๐๐บ๐๐๐๐บ๐ ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐ฑ
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Linda Woodrow
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Joe
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •It seems to me that if these lists were also formatted as a csv, it'd be possible to bulk import them?
functional.cafe/@hungryjoe/113โฆ
Do you know if that exists? or if not, if anyone's looked into that?
Joe
2024-11-16 23:45:23
ChrisC101
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •Raindrops and Roses
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •That's great. Thanks for the resources. To be fair, Mastodon *is* more work. It's part of the experience and not everyone is up for it but those who are find it rewarding and are comitted.
@FediFollows @dansup
`Da Elf
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •@GhostOnTheHalfShell
#Fediverse
responsibility for your interactions are Your responsibility.
TV in the 80s raised children.
Your children (you children) aren't mine.
Grow, adapt, or fuck the fuck off.
I'm sick of this tripe conversation.
Or spoil up a nice if your own.
I'll wait for the flood of incompetence and arguments.
`Da Elf
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •@elfin
#Fediverse
Grow the fuck up. Stop telling how The Internet has to wrap around you being a consumer. Fedi is just a part of 65,535 ports (x2) and really this conversation is fucking boring.
Sol up your own XMPP server (jitsi deploy, 90 seconds), IRC deploy, six seconds.
Aww, you can't Do That?
Funny tell me how to slap the bet around your little asses because you can't.
Not my fucking job.
Grow up.
I'm out of retirement because you're stupid.
billy joe bowers - Harris2024
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •And you can just check out the "Explore" page and follow all the people there.
Honestly, what is with people?
Bam
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •@tiamat271
1) You are amazing.
2) I think itโs the ease of simply tapping โfollow allโ as opposed to the individual following that is being praised.
MylesRyden
in reply to FediThing ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ • • •If it makes you feel any better...
One of my exes moved to our small town from a much larger city. We were at the weekly summer concert out in our city center park. She turns to me and says, "I wish they had Large City Riverfest here."
I asked what that was. She said it was a weekly concert series during the summer, down by the river.
"Isn't that exactly what we are doing now?"
"No, it's completely different because Big City."
OK, whatever. One reason she is my ex.