Skip to main content


This is what the British state regards as due process.

"At some point in the challenge to the ban on Palestine Action beginning on Wednesday, the co-founder of the direct action group will be asked to leave courtroom five at the Royal Courts of Justice, as will her legal team and most others present. Then the case will continue without them.

When Huda Ammori returns to the room, the special advocate – a security-cleared barrister – who represented her interests in her absence will not be allowed to tell her or her legal team what evidence was presented against Palestine Action. If Ammori asks what allegations were made directly against her, the special advocate must not tell her, even though that means she will have no chance to rebut them."

Kafka would have been proud of 'em.

#PalestineAction

theguardian.com/law/2025/nov/2…

in reply to Steve Woods

The article doesn't mention it but surely Magna Carta etc means you have to be told what charges you are facing?