Skip to main content


RE: mastodon.social/@matthiasott/1…

“One approach, proposed by Google Research, is what you might call a “token auction.” In this model, advertisers don’t buy ad slots on a page. Instead, they bid, token by token, on the actual text the model generates. Each advertiser brings their own LLM, and an auction mechanism decides whose model gets to influence the next word. The output is a weighted blend of competing interests, shaped by who’s willing to pay more.”

reshared this

in reply to Colin M. Ford

And this just guarantees that no-one will be able to trust the results.

Google just destroyed their Search market. 🤦

in reply to Billy Smith

@BillySmith We may need to reinvent the search engine, curated lists and webrings.
Google’s secret sauce once was page ranking by links pointing to a site, maybe we need something like page ranking by cryptographic chains of human trust. A good result is a result with a source that has a chain of human trust back to me and no ads.

For a start: “we count the number of uBO blocked requests on the page, and if too many (threshold is set to 5), we kick it out” teclis.com

in reply to chris@strafpla.net

@chris @BillySmith I will look into using this soon. I'm aware of some other search engines that are catered towards the indie web, like @marginalia , but I somehow don't use them at all.

I do agree that hand-curated link directories are the way to go in improving navigation on the current internet.

in reply to Paled

@paled That’s cool, I didn’t know that Marginalia is on the fediverse!
in reply to Colin M. Ford

What kind of organisation would do that? Surely it would just be spammers and propagandists?