Skip to main content


Mullvad controversy


Could someone fully explain the mullvad controversy. From my knowledge so far it seems like the cofounder donated to an alt right party and it's probably a bad sign for the company. Anything I'm missing?
in reply to SomeOne

That's basically it although I don't think it's technically alt-right. More specifically, he donated half a million USD to the Örebro Party

Nationally the party has set out large-scale remigration, closing the Swedish borders to immigration, a stricter assimilation policy and ending taxes on energy and fuel as some of its key issues.
in reply to electric_nan

From what I've seen, it's a weird mishmash of ideologies and the party seems to be run by crazy people.
in reply to SomeOne

The party isn’t properly alt right in any way that an anglosphere dweller would recognize.

It’s not a bad sign for the company in any way. Remember that mullvad was the vpn of choice for pedophiles distributing csam until it wasn’t.

Mullvads recent statement is also extremely carefully worded to avoid taking what the state would call a political stance. While we may recognize that not condemning the donor is political, what the state considers political is support or detraction from some party or of some speech. If mullvad were to make such a political statement it could be subject to a whole different kind of law.

in reply to whatiswrongwithyou

in reply to ProdigalFrog

in reply to whatiswrongwithyou

I would personally say that's unnecessary hairsplitting, since regardless of the specific flavor of evil, it's still monumentally bad their CEO funded it.
in reply to ProdigalFrog

I think there’s a real problem with that line of thinking.

Without understanding a persons politics are just vibes.

Also condensing the bloodthirsty futurists who imagine totalizing war of all against all and honestly quaint ethnonationalists who want to have the third reich but without all those pesky wars is pretty clearly a stumble even if you were to recognize that they’re both the enemy of global communism. It’s worth it to recognize that praline ice cream and pickles are wildly different things even if you don’t like either and they both start with the letter “p”.

And that’s what the op asked about. “It seems like it’s this thing, is that correct?” “No, it’s not that thing”. Which would, to your point, make it neither unnecessary nor hair splitting.

in reply to whatiswrongwithyou

Yes, if you believe they tell the truth (rather than them just co-opting popular ideas like funding education), they're social fascist instead of straight fascist. I'm not sure they deserve the benefit of the doubt, and Hitler did the same thing, as that other commenter said, so there's that. Because of all of this, I don't think it's necessarily wrong to characterize them as fascist, far-right, etc.
in reply to orc girly

I don’t think I’m giving orebro the benefit of the doubt. I wouldn’t say it’s incorrect to call them fascist or far right either. I just think they’re pretty clearly not alt right.
in reply to SomeOne

One of the co-founders/co-ceo's almost single handedly funded a racist political party en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96re… that wants Sweden to manufacture weapons.

The other co-founder/co-ceo stated he did not agree with it, but also doesn't really care because 'free speech'

Mullvad stated that users who were not happy could apply for refunds. some have, some haven't.

Lemmy, and other social media platforms have multiple threads about this, including very obviously biased threads designed to mislead people into believing it was the company who made the donation, or that there is only one ceo.

Paying mullvad does equal funding that political party.

in reply to eremophila

But the profits of the company are being used to fund that political party. If people cancel their subscription the Mullvad CEO will earn less money and won't be able to spend as much funding racial segregation. You should vote with your wallet as much as possible.
in reply to mildseason

As mentioned in the last line of my comment that you replied to.
in reply to eremophila

in reply to nitroemdash

"Remigration" is ethnic displacement. There is most definitely something racist about that. It's up there with some of the most heinous crimes against humanity you can commit.
This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to nitroemdash

I'm sure you can hand select passages about hitler that also suit your stance while making him seem like kermit the frog.

Since when are weapons not a problem?

in reply to eremophila

These are literally the first passages from Wikipedia.

What country doesn't have domestic weapons manufacturing? Is it a problem when US or France do it?

in reply to nitroemdash

Yes of course it is a problem when the usa, france, russia etc do it, it obviously makes them evil countries. Weapons exist to kill.

The usa is responsible for approximately 42% of the global arms market. 1 country, 42%, clearly not the good guys.

in reply to nitroemdash

" The party has been variously characterised as left-wing and right-wing, as well as populist, nationalist and conservative."

"Leaving the EU and NATO were on the table for ÖP. Regarding NATO Allard claimed that Sweden cannot trust or rely on NATO and that the country should instead seek to massively increase its weapons production and also become a major arms exporter, arguing it would benefit the Swedish economy"

"The party advocates for remigration policies, strong secularism, and assimilationist policies such as immediate closure of the Islamic charter schools.[70][71]
[72]Markus Allard initiated heavy debate in 2025 by claiming that Sweden is "the land for/belongs to the Swedes"

They also want to remove fuel taxation, they are pro nuclear, and are anti wind turbine.

in reply to SomeOne

A cofounder donated to the Örebro Party, which has an eclectic platform. Mostly, progressive liberals of the imperial core are (justifiably) upset about its immigration/“remigration” policies and upset about its anti-NATO policies.

Companies are owned by the bourgeoisie, who are right wing1. So “voting with your dollar” over this is largely performative, because the VPN you switch to will also be bourgeois-owned.


  1. With the rare exception of bourgeois class traitors. ↩︎
This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to davel

Companies are owned by the bourgeoisie, who are right wing[1]. So “voting with your dollar” over this is largely performative


Yet they will still respond to capital pressure in large enough numbers. In a broken system like capitalism that's what holds power. If not you can write off BDS and any other type of boycotts.

in reply to geneva_convenience

Mullvad didn’t fund Õbrero; one of Mullvad’s owners did, and boycotting Mullvad won’t un-donate those funds, because there’s no return policy on political donations.
in reply to davel

Mullvad didn't condemn the funding and the owner will certainly continue using profits from his company to fund far-right remigration efforts if he specifically chose that party instead of any other generic leftist party.

Also Mullvad is very expensive compared to other VPN's to begin with. And Mullvad's servers have been getting blocked everywhere lately so there's no real reason to use it either. Might as well use AirVPN or the likes. I'm probably switching to Proton for ease of use but i might choose another sooner or later.

in reply to geneva_convenience

Condemning the funding could (I’m not an expert or lawyer) open the company up to a different type of law intended for “terrorism” or “extremism”. I do not know what actually drove the publishing of such a fence riding post on their part but that’s a possible explanation that takes into account the conditions and foresight the company has exercised in the past.

Also as an airvpn user do not use it for security or privacy. It’s a really good piracy vpn just use it for that. If you’re concerned for your safety please consider carefully the consequences of your choices when you register for proton (don’t make a services account, don’t use a recovery email that can be tied to you or at all, pay cash). A lot of the services people hold up as alternatives have ways for the unaware user to accidentally screw it up and end up in a bad situation.

in reply to whatiswrongwithyou

pay cash


Ooo! I didn't know Proton accepted cash payments. But you are right. They do.

My proton is tied to me, b/c I didn't really care and it wasn't important to my threat model. But it's good to know they offer this. I was paying for Mullvad with cash. Since the whole thing has happened with Mullvad, maybe I'll open a cash paid Proton just for the VPN option.

I really wish Proton offered Wireguard tho. It's so much nicer than OpenVPN.

in reply to FineCoatMummy

I’m pretty sure you can do wg with proton: protonvpn.com/support/wireguar…
in reply to geneva_convenience

Both. The first couple of sentences are about air and the rest is about how you gotta keep your head on a swivel when you sign up for proton.
in reply to geneva_convenience

So largely performative. With enough pressure, Mullvad might say something negative about a bourgeois party, which won’t do anything.

There’s no reason to think Proton would be any different in this regard. Proton Mail Says It’s “Politically Neutral” While Praising Republican Party

in reply to davel

They're nowhere comparable. Proton's case is relevant to their business and to VPN's as a whole. Not just doing random private donations to Nazis. As they stated in response to the article:

Also objectively Proton would receive less money because they're a lot cheaper.

in reply to CrypticCoffee

To be clear the notion that any of the two US parties would be better in any way than the other is just stupid. It's all good-cop bad-cop. But at least Proton isn't directly donating to any of them.
in reply to SomeOne

These pop up controversies are interesting (and usually fleeting?).

If we were to examine every place we put our money, we would probably find that some of it ends up contributing to nasty shit.

Buy cheap clothes in a Penneys or US equivalent: sweatshops.

Buy food in large food retailers: exploitation of small farmers and food producers.

Buy painkillers: "Oxy is good for you, we promise..." ---> lots of dead people.

Pay for Mullvad: funding dodgy parties...and so on.

The only way to truly avoid this is to live in a cave and never use money again! Or self host, all the things.

in reply to ropatrick

What a defeatist perspective. It's not all or nothing, and a VPN is something I can very easily change, especially when the co-owner of the VPN is one of the only major donors of a giant alt right party
in reply to Cease

I accept your point but as someone else pointed out, put your money elsewhere and its as likely to end up in a dodgy place is it not? It seems like every day theres a controversy like this about where the money goes.

I dont necessarily hold the view that I was posting, more so putting it up for perspective. If we were to take that approach we would all be driven demented.

in reply to ropatrick

Sooo what's your point? Did you not just read me say a VPN is easy to change? It's not like it's exactly hard to find a good one - just use airvpn
in reply to Cease

I know its easy to change, my point is, no matter who we change to, the same could well be happening. Peoples' frustration at finding it hard to know what company to trust, is palpable. One company let's them down, they move to another. That company either doesn't, or does.

I know nothing about airvpn, but you obviously trust them, and others do too I'm sure, until they are splashed across Lemmy for funding X, Y or Z, and then people move again etc.

Defeatist maybe. Is it too controversial to say that maybe we shouldn't get so wound up about this stuff? Pick the company with the lesser of the evils?

People are selective about what they get hyped up about. They will change their VPN from Mullvad, but still buy clothes that are made in sweatshops. Its just interesting to see how people react to certain things.

in reply to Cease

in reply to Postmortal_Pop

Dude I put in the work over a decade ago and haven't had to change since....

I also don't know what to say to the take that "punishing people for their flaws is why maga is where it is" I think it's quite the opposite

Idk about everyone else, but this reads like AI... maybe it was the phase

"Instead of bemoaning our failure to rise, you've got to approach it with understanding and appreciation for the goopy human core and advocate for realistic solutions" lmao

in reply to SomeOne

  1. You pay for Mullvad.
  2. Mullvad makes a little bit of profit
  3. Profit goes in large part to one of the two co-owners
  4. Co-owner donates huge sums to a very right wing, incredibly racist party. This is not "just" a party that has some racism. It is a true nationalistic racist party with despicable politics.

So paying for Mullvad indirectly funds this party.

in reply to ComradePenguin

Yup. As in, referring to immigrants as 'parasites' level racism.

Sweden belongs to the Swedes. We have to make sure that we take care of our own damn people and we must deport these damn parasites who sit and live at our expense.


  • Markus Allard
in reply to SomeOne

I'm missing even more. What does "paying for Mullvad" mean? What is the product?
in reply to melsaskca

their primary product is a VPN. for ages they've been the best in class for privacy vpn. however, it turns out their CEO is basically singlehandedly bankrolling a far right political party in Sweden so people are looking for alternatives