Apparently, #Eskom is going after people on #solar, who are still connected to the grid in some way, calling their installations "illegal" and charging exorbitant sums of money to become "compliant". :( #SouthAfrica
mybroadband.co.za/news/energy/…
Big warning for solar power users in South Africa
Eskom regards all solar power systems connected to its grid without registration to be “illegal” and “unsafe,” regardless of whether they have a CoC and been configured not to feed electricity back into the grid.Hanno Labuschagne (MyBroadband)
Allen Very Serious Versfeld
in reply to Graham Downs • • •I wasn't aware that anybody was doing grid-tied in South Africa - I thought we were all battery-backed hybrid installs, to cope with loadshedding? The difference might not be important because my hybrid setup can also feed power back to the grid (although that's horribly dangerous and illegal to do it without the proper metering and switching - If the city turns off the local grid so workers can safely work on them, I really don't want to be the dickhead re-energizing that grid to try and knock a few rands off my bill and killing somebody) but that feature is disabled by the installers.
And... I dunno, I think two things are happening here.
1) Eskom using dodgy intimidation tactics to protect their monopoly (Calling a "community meeting" under false pretenses and them taking names and ambushing attendees with threats is a dick move)
and
2) A bunch of idiots ignoring legislation and regulations installing dangerous systems because screw eskom, nobody tells me what to do, I'll just tell them to get lost (I had a landlord who was like that... he got fined a qu
... Show more...I wasn't aware that anybody was doing grid-tied in South Africa - I thought we were all battery-backed hybrid installs, to cope with loadshedding? The difference might not be important because my hybrid setup can also feed power back to the grid (although that's horribly dangerous and illegal to do it without the proper metering and switching - If the city turns off the local grid so workers can safely work on them, I really don't want to be the dickhead re-energizing that grid to try and knock a few rands off my bill and killing somebody) but that feature is disabled by the installers.
And... I dunno, I think two things are happening here.
1) Eskom using dodgy intimidation tactics to protect their monopoly (Calling a "community meeting" under false pretenses and them taking names and ambushing attendees with threats is a dick move)
and
2) A bunch of idiots ignoring legislation and regulations installing dangerous systems because screw eskom, nobody tells me what to do, I'll just tell them to get lost (I had a landlord who was like that... he got fined a quarter of a million rand. It was a police matter. FAFO.)
For what it's worth, my system is fully registered, fully compliant, and has a full CoC - I didn't have to ask for any of this, I just used real electricians who know the law and who did it all automatically without being asked because they don't want to lose their licenses by doing dodgy installs.
If I want to sell power back to the city, then I'll also need to buy one of those expensive two-way meters, but the rates they want to pay are so low that it's not worth it.
Graham Downs
in reply to Allen Very Serious Versfeld • • •@uastronomer I used a real electrician too, and got a proper installation with a proper CoC. I don't have a meter that can feed electricity back into the grid, though, and according to the article, I get the impression that one of the requirements is that you *must* get one, whether you intend to do so or not. And they're saying that the CoC you got from your electrician isn't actually sufficient and you need another document. And something about requiring an isolator/cutoff to your inverter installed outside of your premises, that's accessible to Eskom (not 100% sure what that means, because doesn't everyone have a means for Eskom to cut off their power remotely?).
Re being totally off-grid, I think some people are. If you have enough panels and wind turbines, and you have a big enough battery to keep your household running for days, then you can contact them and officially disconnect from the grid. Then they truly won't care about you at all anymore (but if w
... Show more...@uastronomer I used a real electrician too, and got a proper installation with a proper CoC. I don't have a meter that can feed electricity back into the grid, though, and according to the article, I get the impression that one of the requirements is that you *must* get one, whether you intend to do so or not. And they're saying that the CoC you got from your electrician isn't actually sufficient and you need another document. And something about requiring an isolator/cutoff to your inverter installed outside of your premises, that's accessible to Eskom (not 100% sure what that means, because doesn't everyone have a means for Eskom to cut off their power remotely?).
Re being totally off-grid, I think some people are. If you have enough panels and wind turbines, and you have a big enough battery to keep your household running for days, then you can contact them and officially disconnect from the grid. Then they truly won't care about you at all anymore (but if we have a week with no sun or wind, and your batteries run dead and you need to reconnect, get in line because... well, they don't really care about you 🙂)
Allen Very Serious Versfeld
in reply to Graham Downs • • •Yeah I mean we're municipal customers - we connect to our city grids and pay our bills to the municipality. But rural people have to buy direct from Eskom, which is expensive to set up - they pay for running kilometers of overhead lines to their home, for example. And on those setups, there has to be a switch that Eskom can reach without trespassing onto your property.
It's just not an issue for urban folks like us because all that infrastructure is already set up, and we're not connected to Eskom's grid in the first place - we're on the city grid.
You've got the little meter on the sidewalk outside your home, there's a lockable master switch that they can use to turn off your power if needed (we've had this done when we were behind on a bill!). Eskom wants the same on farms and factories, because they want to be able to cut you off if don't pay your bill, or if you do something dangerous.
Grid-tied is almost the opposite of off-grid - there's no batteries, and your panels run at 100% all the time - unused power gets fed into the grid, and you're only supposed to
... Show more...Yeah I mean we're municipal customers - we connect to our city grids and pay our bills to the municipality. But rural people have to buy direct from Eskom, which is expensive to set up - they pay for running kilometers of overhead lines to their home, for example. And on those setups, there has to be a switch that Eskom can reach without trespassing onto your property.
It's just not an issue for urban folks like us because all that infrastructure is already set up, and we're not connected to Eskom's grid in the first place - we're on the city grid.
You've got the little meter on the sidewalk outside your home, there's a lockable master switch that they can use to turn off your power if needed (we've had this done when we were behind on a bill!). Eskom wants the same on farms and factories, because they want to be able to cut you off if don't pay your bill, or if you do something dangerous.
Grid-tied is almost the opposite of off-grid - there's no batteries, and your panels run at 100% all the time - unused power gets fed into the grid, and you're only supposed to do this with smart meters where the utility can measure how much energy they're receiving (so they can pay you for it), but also so they can cut if off (people working on the lines, faulty equipment generating out of phase with the rest of the grid, and whatever other reasons). It's cheap to set up, and if you've got an old-fashioned meter, those electromechanical ones with the turning wheel, then pumping energy back out will run it backwards and your bill goes down, but this is very illegal and always has been, whether you're using solar or a diesel generator.
Graham Downs
in reply to Allen Very Serious Versfeld • • •@uastronomer Fair enough. You make some good points. So it's likely that most of that stuff doesn't really apply to us in urban areas who already have approved meters, and whose inverters and solar were installed by qualified electricians and who got proper CoCs?
Besides, as you say, we pay the municipality for your electricity, not Eskom direct....
Allen Very Serious Versfeld
in reply to Graham Downs • • •I'm actually a bit torn on this. Like, I've seen Eskom bring the hammer down on people who've messed around, and it's not pretty - police get involved, quarter million rand fines (for first offence!!!), they don't mess about. So the folks in the article are getting treated with kid gloves.
But on the other hand... why, right? Why the bait&switch, why the ambush, ya know? Is that place just so bureaucratic they don't know how to just act like people? And so many of these regulations are so clearly about protecting their monopoly, blocking out competition - even the safety ones would be less of an issue if they were willing to put the right mechanisms in place (which, I guess they're starting to do, with those bidirectional smart meters). Anyway, it's frikkin' Eskom, I do NOT want to be defending those guys 😂
Graham Downs
in reply to Allen Very Serious Versfeld • • •@uastronomer LOL No. No we don't. From a purely safety angle, I understand. But like I said, I thought that safety stuff was already in place. They can already switch me off when they want to work. And why did I get the impression I *have* to have a bidrectional meter if I have no intention (at this stage) of feeding power back into the grid?
I have a smallish inverter with a smallist battery and relatively few panels. I don't run my whole house off solar; only around half of it. The pool and the stove and the socket that the kettle plugs into aren't running off the inverter. Why should they care about little ol' me?
But what you're saying makes sense, and I now get the feeling they probably *don't* care about little ol' me, so I shouldn't be worried....
Allen Very Serious Versfeld
in reply to Graham Downs • • •I blame the journalist who wrote that article! And also Eskom for assuming that everybody understands their jargon.
But the meter thing, I happen to know from messages sent by the municipality (apparently somebody misfiled my licensing application and I had to send it again. This was the one bit of "Don't worry about it, we got it" paperwork that I ended up having to worry about after all!) that my bidirectional meter is optional, for my account, expensive, and a pre-requisite for if I want to sell power back to the grid. I imagine it's the same for City of Cape Town?
Graham Downs
in reply to Allen Very Serious Versfeld • • •Allen Very Serious Versfeld
in reply to Graham Downs • • •Leon Cowle
in reply to Allen Very Serious Versfeld • • •Allen Very Serious Versfeld
in reply to Leon Cowle • • •@leoncowle I dunno. Probably just bad marketing? When I think UPS, I picture a heavy box under my desk that makes the computer work long enough to shut it down (or a big version in a server room). So maybe people selling the things want to differentiate?
Or maybe... since the inverter and battery are separate components (unlike a UPS which bundles them together in a single box), it's easier to think of the inverter as being the thing that does the work (because it kind of does - it charges the batteries, it distributes power, conditions it, etc)
Just guesses though.
Gordon Inggs
in reply to Allen Very Serious Versfeld • • •@uastronomer @leoncowle huh, was wondering the same thing the other day.
My theory was that because people often buy the batteries and inverters by themselves, vs batteries + inverters + panels, the systems get named after the common component that is fairly unique