No press on this yet. US House Committee on the Judiciary, ranking member (senior member of minority party) #JamieRaskin issued this press release on house-dot-gov,
*Top 10 Reasons the $1.8B Slush Fund and Super-Pardon... Are #Unconstitutional, #Illegal, and a Fraud on the Court* May 27, 2026
#fascist #USA #OurPutin #SeditionSlushFund #Jan6 #settlement #money #funding #militia #ammunition #guns #insurrection #radicalized #white #supremacist #terrorists #pardoned #SCotUS
democrats-judiciary.house.gov/…
*Top 10 Reasons the $1.8B Slush Fund and Super-Pardon... Are #Unconstitutional, #Illegal, and a Fraud on the Court* May 27, 2026
#fascist #USA #OurPutin #SeditionSlushFund #Jan6 #settlement #money #funding #militia #ammunition #guns #insurrection #radicalized #white #supremacist #terrorists #pardoned #SCotUS
democrats-judiciary.house.gov/…
The Top 10 Reasons Donald Trump’s $1.776 Billion “Weaponization” Slush Fund and Super-Pardon for His Family and Businesses Are Unconstitutional, Illegal and a Fraud on the Court
Washington, D.C. (May 27, 2026)—Today, Rep. Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, released a new fact sheet detailing the top 10 reasons why Trump’s $1.U.S. House Judiciary Committee Democrats
volkris
in reply to getmisch • • •A lot of what Raskin writes here is not only wrong but actually serves as the member seeking to duck accountability for his role in sanctioning the program.
Right off the bat, the slush fund "purports to draw from the Judgment Fund"? Well right, and it's exactly why the Judgement Fund shouldn't have been funded by Congress in the way that it was.
This has been a problem for a long time, and Raskin bears some responsibility for it.
We need to hold folks like him accountable for being part of the problem.