When it was first revealed how energy-hungry LLMs and related AIs are, there were no end of apologists claiming that AI didn't use much energy and it "just needed it for the learning" as if that was some kind of one-off thing that would soon be over.
Then we get the reality like this:
tomshardware.com/tech-industryβ¦
This is in the middle of a deadly climate crisis where we are supposed to be lowering energy use instead of vastly increasing it.
We have to say no to this, we have to tell "generative AI" people that this is not acceptable and they are killing the world by supporting this crap.
#AI #LLM #LLMs
Sara Joy
in reply to FediThing • • •Sensitive content
oooof.
I keep getting whiplash over AI's energy and water use. I gather the water use bit has been overblown, maybe, possibly, and us lefties have fallen for it?
Then I start questioning myself re the power use too. But articles like this help me straighten it out a bit, thank you.
Been enjoying Tom's Hardware's journalism lately. They weren't always into news, apart from new hardware reviews, were they? Maybe I never noticed before AI entered politics.
FediThing
in reply to Sara Joy • • •Sensitive content
It's not just the energy and water, it's also the theft of labour without credit or compensation, the deskilling of its users, the devaluing and commoditisation of art, the inaccuracy of its answers, the empowerment of far-right billionaires to control knowledge, the destruction of education and research, the dependence of society on people promoting fascism etc.
There are so many things wrong with it.
Sara Joy
in reply to FediThing • • •Sensitive content
FediThing
in reply to FediThing • • •Sensitive content
Now there's going to be an AI data centre in Utah which will consume more energy than Utah:
mastodon.social/@JulianOliver/β¦
Julian Oliver (@JulianOliver@mastodon.social)
Julian Oliver (Mastodon)bazkie π©πΌβπ» bitplanes π΅
in reply to FediThing • • •Sensitive content